Evaluation of Ovary Dose for woman of Childbearing age Woman with Breast cancer in tomotherapy

가임기 여성의 유방암 토모치료 시 난소선량 평가비교

  • Lee, Soo Hyeung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Soo Yeun (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Ji Min (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Ju Young (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jong Suk (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center)
  • 이수형 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 박수연 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 최지민 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 박주영 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 김종석 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.14
  • Accepted : 2014.12.02
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

Purpose : The aim of this study is to evaluate unwanted scattered dose to ovary by scattering and leakage generated from treatment fields of Tomotherapy for childbearing woman with breast cancer. Materials and Methods : The radiation treatments plans for left breast cancer were established using Tomotherapy planning system (Tomotherapy, Inc, USA). They were generated by using helical and direct Tomotherapy methods for comparison. The CT images for the planning were scanned with 2.5 mm slice thickness using anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson-Rando phantom, The Phantom Laboratory, USA). The measurement points for the ovary dose were determined at the points laterally 30 cm apart from mid-point of treatment field of the pelvis. The measurements were repeated five times and averaged using glass dosimeters (1.5 mm diameter and 12 mm of length) equipped with low-energy correction filter. The measures dose values were also converted to Organ Equivalent Dose (OED) by the linear exponential dose-response model. Results : Scattered doses of ovary which were measured based on two methods of Tomo helical and Tomo direct showed average of $64.94{\pm}0.84mGy$ and $37.64{\pm}1.20mGy$ in left ovary part and average of $64.38{\pm}1.85mGy$ and $32.96{\pm}1.11mGy$ in right ovary part. This showed when executing Tomotherapy, measured scattered dose of Tomo Helical method which has relatively greater monitor units (MUs) and longer irradiation time are approximately 1.8 times higher than Tomo direct method. Conclusion : Scattered dose of left and right ovary of childbearing women is lower than ICRP recommended does which is not seriously worried level against the infertility and secondary cancer occurrence. However, as breast cancer occurrence ages become younger in the future and radiation therapy using high-precision image guidance equipment like Tomotherapy is developed, clinical follow-up studies about the ovary dose of childbearing women patients would be more required.

목 적 : 최근 시행되고 있는 가임기 여성의 유방암 토모치료 시 치료영역 외에서 발생되는 산란 및 누설에 의한 난소산란선량을 측정하여 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 인체모형팬텀(Aldorson Rando phantom, USA)을 대상으로 전산화단층영상 2.5 mm 획득 후, Tomotherapy Planning station(Tomotherapy, Inc, USA)을 이용하여 좌측 유방암 환자의 토모테라피 치료계획(Tomotherapy Helical & Tomotherapy Direct)을 수립하였다. 난소의 산량 선량 측정을 위한 측정 지점은 치료계획면적의 30 cm 아래 떨어진 골반의 좌우 위치로 직경 1.5 mm, 길이가 12mm인 저에너지용 보상필터가 들어있는 종류의 유리선량계 (GD-352M, ASAHI TECHNO GLASS CO, Japan)를 이용하여 각 5회씩 측정하여 평균하였으며, 선형지수-선량반응모델을 이용한 장기등가선량(organ equivalent dose: OED)으로 평가하였다. 결 과 : 토모 Helical 및 토모 Direct의 두 가지 방식으로 측정된 난소의 산란선량은 좌측 난소부위가 각각 평균 $64.94{\pm}0.84mGy$, $37.64{\pm}1.20mGy$이고, 우측 난소부위가 평균 $64.38{\pm}1.85mGy$, $32.96{\pm}1.11mGy$로 나타났다. 이는 토모치료 시 비교적 모니터 단위(MU)가 크고 조사 시간이 긴 토모Helical 방식이 토모Direct에 비하여 측정된 산란선량의 양이 보다 약 1.8배 높은 경향을 보였다. 결 론 : 가임기 여성의 유방암 토모테라피 시 발생하는 좌우측 난소의 산량선량은 ICRP 권고 선량이하로, 불임 및 2차 암 발생에 대한 우려 수준은 현저히 낮지만 향후 유방암 발생 연령층이 낮아지고, 토모테라피와 같이 고정밀 영상유도장치를 이용한 방사선치료가 발달할수록, 가임기 여성 환자의 난소산란선량에 대한 임상적 추적조사가 더욱 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤정한: 한국 유방암 현황: 한국유방암학회 2014유방암 백서 2014.10:6-11
  2. 허승재: 유방암 방사선치료의 최근 발전: 대한의사 협회지 2009;52(10): 975-980
  3. 송주영: 토모테라피를 이용한 폐종양 방사선수술 계획 시 선량 :한국의학물리학회지: 제22권 제4호 2011.12.178-183
  4. Hall EJ, Wuu CS: Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 56(1):83-88 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00073-7
  5. Technical Report: Explanation Material of RPL Glass Dosimeter. Small Element System. Asahi Techno Glass Corporation (2000)
  6. Hsu SM, Yeh SH, Lin MS, Chen WL: Comparison on characteristics of radiophotoluminescent glass dosimters and thermoluminescent dosimeters. Radiaition Protection Dosimetery 119(1-4):327-331 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci510
  7. Mary C, James W: CT Anatomy of the Female Pelvis: A Second Look. Radiographics 1994; 14:51-66 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.14.1.8128066
  8. 신명호, 조재호, 김경태, 장재천, 박복환: 가임기 여성 정상 난소의 자기공명영상: 나이에 따른 난소의 발견율과 크기 및 난포의 수와 크기. 대한방사선의학회지 2002;46:241-245
  9. Dong Wook Kim et al: Risk ofsecond cancer from scattered radiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapies with lung cancer. Radiation oncology 2013; 8.47 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-47
  10. Uwe Schneider; Estimation of radiation-induced cancer from three-dimensional dose distributions: Concept of organ equivalent dose. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics vol. 61, No. 5 1510-1515, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.040