International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synthesis of DOT Use of Beam End Protection for Extending the Life of Bridges

  • Radlinska, Aleksandra (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University) ;
  • McCarthy, Leslie Myers (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova University) ;
  • Matzke, James (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova University) ;
  • Nagel, Francis (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova University)
  • Received : 2013.10.28
  • Accepted : 2014.05.03
  • Published : 2014.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the national transportation infrastructure ages and deteriorates, many existing bridges require frequent and costly maintenance and repairs. The objective of this work was to synthesize new and existing types of beam end coatings and treatments that have been proven to extend the life of new and existing concrete and steel bridge beams. A comprehensive literature review, along with online surveys and phone interviews of State department of transportations (DOTs) and coating manufacturers was conducted to gather information about existing and recently developed technologies. The study revealed that while many promising coatings and treatments are offered on the market, there is a lack of readily available laboratory results that would enable direct comparison of the available methods. This finding applies in terms of the coatings' durability and the potential for extending the service life of existing bridges. Most of the interviewed State DOTs' personnel assessed the products listed in respective DOT's Qualified Products Lists as performing 'well'. However, there was significant variability between states in the type of the products used. Among the agencies contacted, none was able to suggest the most promising or advanced products, either for concrete or steel bridge beam end treatments. This suggests that comprehensive laboratory evaluation would be necessary for selecting the best available beam end treatments and coatings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

References

  1. ACI 345.1R-06 Guide for Maintenance of Concrete Bridge Members. (2006). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  2. ACI Committee 546 Concrete Repair Guide. (1996). ACI 46R-96, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
  3. Ahlborn, T. M., Kasper, J. M., Aktan, H., Koyuncu, Y., & Rutyna, J. (2002). Causes and cures of prestressed concrete I-beam end deterioration. Report No. CSD 2002-02, Center for Structural Durability, Michigan Tech Transportation Institute, and Michigan Department of Transportation Report RC-112, Lansing, MI.
  4. Al-Gahtani, A. S., Ibrahim, M., Maslehuddin, M., & Almusallam, A. A. (1999). Performance of concrete surface treatment systems. Concrete International, 21(1), 64-68.
  5. Basheer, P. A. M., Basheer, L., Cleland, D. J., & Long, A. E. (1997). Surface treatments for concrete: Assessment methods and reported performance". Construction and Building Materials, 11(7-8), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00019-6
  6. Cady, P. D. (1994). Sealers for portland cement concrete highway facilities. NCHRP Synthesis Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  7. Ghoddousi, P., Raiss Ghasemi, A. M., Parhizkar, T. (2007). The effect of concrete quality on performance of surface treatment materials. In: R. N. Kraus, T. R. Naik, P. Claisse, H. Sadeghi-Pouya, ed. Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies, 11-13 June 2007 Coventry, Special papers proceedings, Pub. UW Milwaukee CBU, 78-84.
  8. Grand Challenges for Engineering (2012). National Academy of Engineering of the national academies. Accessed on June 7, 2002, from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org.
  9. Guide Specification for Application of Coating Systems with Zinc-Rich Primers to Steel Bridges. (2006). AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration, SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings.
  10. Helsel, J. L., & Wissmar, K. (2008). Estimating the cost and service life of protective coatings. Journal of Protective Coatings and Linings, 25(7), 32-40.
  11. Henry, G. (2004). Penetrating water-repellent sealers. Concrete International, 26(5), 81-83.
  12. Holland, T. C. (1992). Corrosion protection for reinforced concrete: a summary of corrosion prevention strategies. Concrete Construction, 37(3), 4.
  13. Ibrahim, M., Al-Gahtani, A. S., Maslehuddin, M., & Dakhil, F. H. (1999). Use of surface treatment materials to improve concrete durability. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 11(36), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(36)
  14. Kerkhoff, B. (2007). Effects of substances on concrete and guide to protective treatments. Skokie: Portland Cement Association.
  15. Kline E. S. (2012). Bridges for service life beyond 100 years: Corrosion protection for 100 years. Accessed June, 2012, from www.kta.com.
  16. Michigan Department of Transportation Special Provision for Prestressed Concrete I Beam End Repair with Latex Modified Concrete. (2011). 12RC712(A055).
  17. Myers, J., Washer, G., & Zhang, W. (2010). Structural Steel coatings for corrosion mitigation. Center for transportation infrastructure and safety. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, MO.
  18. Needham, D. E. (2000). Prestressed concrete beam end repair. MDOT Report Number R-1380. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  19. Palle, S., & Hopwood, T. (2006). Coatings, sealants and fillers to address bridge concrete deterioration and aestheticsphase I. Kentucky Transportation Center Report No. KTC06-36/SPR291-04-1F.
  20. Paul, J. H. (1998). Extending the life of concrete repairs. Concrete International, 20(3), 62-66.
  21. Portland Cement Association (PCA) Concrete Information. (2001). Effects of Substances on Concrete and Guide to Protective Treatments. IS001, PCA, Skokie, IL.
  22. Silano L. G., (Ed.) (1993). Bridge inspection and rehabilitation. A practical guide. New York, NY: Wiley.
  23. Sohanghpurwala, A. (2006). Manual on service life of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete bridge superstructure elements. NCHRP Report 558, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  24. Sohanghpurwala, A. (2009). Protection for life extension of existing reinforced concrete bridge elements. NCHRP Synthesis 398 Report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  25. Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance (2010). Report to Congress, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration.
  26. Tabatabai, H., Ghorbanpoor, A., & Turnquist-Nass, A. (2005). Rehabilitation techniques for concrete bridges. Wisconsin Highway Research Program, Report Number WHRP 05-01.
  27. Van de Lindt, J. W., & Ahlborn, T. M. (2005). Development of steel beam end deterioration guidelines. MDOT Research Report RC-1454. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  28. Whiting, D. A., Ost, B., Nagi, M., & Cady, P. D. (1992). Condition evaluation of concrete bridges relative to reinforcement corrosion, vol. 5: Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of penetrating sealers. Publication SHRP-S/FR-92-107, Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
  29. Whiting, D. A., Stejskal, B. G., & Nagi, M. A. (1993). Conditions of prestressed concrete bridge components: Technology review and field surveys. Publication FHWA-RD-93-037, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  30. Whiting, D. A., Stejskal, B. G., & Nagi, M. A. (1998). Rehabilitation of prestressed concrete bridge components by nonelectrical (conventional) methods. Publication FHWA-RD-98-189, Federal Highway Administration,Washington, DC.
  31. Williams, J. (2012). Coating of structural steel for public structures, corrosion defense. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Accessed July 16, 2012, from https://www.corrdefense.org/Academia%20Government%20and%20Industry/T-27.pdf.
  32. Yao, Y., Kodumuri, P., & Lee, S.-K. (2011). Performance evaluation of one-coat systems for new steel bridges. Publication FHWA-HRT-11-046. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  33. Younce, R., Hopwood, T., & Palle, S. (2008). Experimental concrete coating application on the median barrier of I-65 in Louisville. Kentucky Transportation Center Report No. KTC-08-20/FR155-06-1F. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Wet Curing Duration on Long-Term Performance of Concrete in Tidal Zone of Marine Environment vol.9, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-015-0118-3
  2. Improving Impact Resistance of Polymer Concrete Using CNTs vol.10, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0165-4
  3. An Efficient Chloride Ingress Model for Long-Term Lifetime Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures Under Realistic Climate and Exposure Conditions vol.11, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-017-0185-8
  4. Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Corrosion-Fatigue and Climate Change vol.12, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0235-x
  5. Simulation method of concrete chloride ingress with mesoscopic cellular automata vol.249, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118778