DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Comparison of the Result of Epiduroscopic Laser Neural Decompression between FBSS or Not

  • Jo, Dae Hyun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Eung Don (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Oh, Hyun Jin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2013.11.22
  • Accepted : 2013.12.18
  • Published : 2014.01.01

Abstract

Background: Epiduroscopic laser neural decompression (ELND) has been performed as a treatment tool for chronic refractory low back pain and/or radicular pain. There are some studies about the usefulness of epiduroscopy for post lumbar surgery syndrome, however, few studies about the effectiveness of epiduroscopy for patients without back surgery. We compared the satisfaction of patients who underwent ELND for chronic low back pain and/or radicular pain after back surgery and for the same symptoms without surgery. Methods: We compared the degree of satisfaction of patients after ELND between who had underwent the lumbar spine surgery and who had not retrospectively by chart reviewing. We divided 39 patients who had received ELND into two groups, one is the group of patients who got the lumbar surgery (group 1), and the other is the group of patients who did not (group 2). Their medical records including age, sex, previous treatment, duration of illness, degree of symptom relief were investigated. We compared each items between two groups. Results: The number of patients in group 1 was 17, and group 2 was 22. In group 1, 16 patients (94.1%) showed more than 'Acceptable', and 19 patients (86.4%) showed more than 'Acceptable' in group 2. There is no significant differences statistically in percentage of patients who showed more than 'Acceptable' in the satisfaction after ELND between two groups. Conclusions: ELND provided satisfaction (more than 85%) for patients with chronic low back pain and/or leg pain regardless of previous back surgery history.

Keywords

References

  1. Jo DH, Yang HJ. The survey of the patient received the epiduroscopic laser neural decompression. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.27
  2. Choy DS. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): twelve years' experience with 752 procedures in 518 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16: 325-31.
  3. Ruetten S, Meyer O, Godolias G. Epiduroscopic diagnosis and treatment of epidural adhesions in chronic back pain syndrome of patients with previous surgical treatment: first results of 31 interventions. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 171-5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-31536
  4. Hayek SM, Helm S, Benyamin RM, Singh V, Bryce DA, Smith HS. Effectiveness of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in post lumbar surgery syndrome: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 419-35.
  5. Takeshima N, Miyakawa H, Okuda K, Hattori S, Hagiwara S, Takatani J, et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic results of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis for failed back surgery syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 400-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen383
  6. Slipman CW, Shin CH, Patel RK, Isaac Z, Huston CW, Lipetz JS, et al. Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 2002; 3: 200-14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02033.x
  7. Jo DH, Yang HJ, Kim JJ. Approach for epiduroscopic laser neural decompression in case of the sacral canal stenosis. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 392-5. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.4.392

Cited by

  1. Results of Lumbar Endoscopic Adhesiolysis Using a Radiofrequency Catheter in Patients with Postoperative Fibrosis and Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Discectomy vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12266
  2. Epiduroscopy as a Diagnostic Tool for the Lower Back Pain and/or Leg Pain vol.29, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.3.151
  3. Sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression for complex regional pain syndrome after lumbar spinal surgery vol.97, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010694
  4. Epiduroscopic laser neural decompression as a treatment for migrated lumbar disc herniation vol.97, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010291
  5. The outcome of epiduroscopy treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and radicular pain, operated or non-operated for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study in 88 patients vol.31, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.2.109
  6. Evaluation of epiduroscopy for detection of vertebral canal and spinal cord lesions in dogs vol.77, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.77.7.766
  7. Laser application in neurosurgery vol.8, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_489_16
  8. Current Knowledge of Epiduroscopy vol.37, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2199/jjsca.37.270
  9. Clinical Outcomes of Trans-Sacral Epiduroscopic Laser Decompression (SELD) in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation vol.2020, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1537875
  10. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Epiduroscopic Laser Neural Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniations: Retrospective Analysis of 163 Cases- Evaluation of the Efficacy of ELNP vol.2020, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7361691
  11. Outcomes of epiduroscopic laser ablation in patients with lumbar disc herniation vol.99, pp.51, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000023337
  12. Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease vol.21, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00949-8
  13. Expanded Indications of Full Endoscopic Spine Sugery vol.6, pp.suppl1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2021.00129
  14. Factors Predicting the Clinical Outcome After Trans-sacral Epiduroscopic Laser Decompression for Lumbar Disc Herniation vol.18, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040824.412