DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic Valuation of Official Management for Invasive Insects and Diseases in Fruits

과실 병해충에 대한 공적방제조치의 가치분석

  • Kwon, Daeyoung (Program in Regional Information, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Minsu (Program in Regional Information, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Brian H.S. (Program in Regional Information, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University)
  • 권대영 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부 지역정보전공) ;
  • 손민수 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부 지역정보전공) ;
  • 김홍석 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부 지역정보전공)
  • Received : 2014.10.31
  • Accepted : 2014.11.13
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

The objective of this study is to estimate the economic value of official management and control for invasive insects and diseases in fruits. The direct and indirect effect of this control measure can be the changes in price of fruits and related goods, changes in export volume of domestic fruits, changes in total volume of fruit production, and reduce the risk in food safety. The contingent valuation method with the single-bounded dichotomous choice is employed to estimate each household's willingness-to-pay (WTP) to maintain official management and control measures. The total number of sample consists 2,050 respondents between the ages of 19-60 years, and the survey is conducted using Web-based survey. The estimated results for mean WTP is 5,443won per month per household. Therefore, the total economic value of official management and control on fruit in Korea is estimated to be approximately 94.4 billion won per month.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeong, H. K., Kim, C. G., and Moon, D. H., 2014, An Analysis of Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Damage Occurrence by Insect Pests and Disease, The Korean Society of Environmental Agriculture, 33(1): 52-56. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2014.33.1.52
  2. Kim, K. and Oh, H., 2011, A Study on the Treatment of Protest Zero Bids in Dichotomous Contingent Valuation Models, Seoul : Korea Development Institute.
  3. Nam, C. H., 1998, Sample Selection Biases in Sociological Studies, Korean Journal of Sociology, 32: 99-136.
  4. Oh, C. S., 2013, The Concept of Public Control and Plant Disease Management Practices, Korean Society of Applied Entomology Spring Meeting, 35-35.
  5. Son, M. S. and Kim, Brian H. S., 2014, A Comparative Study of Bias Controlled Benefit Estimation for Contaminated Soil Purification: Case in Sihwa National Industrial Complex, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 49(5): 305-319. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2014.08.49.5.305
  6. Son, M. S., Kim, J. H., and Brian H. S. Kim, 2010, Valuation of the Han River Renaissance Project: Banpo, Jamwon District by Considering of Sample Selection Bias, Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 26(2): 107-121.
  7. Arthur, M., 2006, Economic Analysis of Quarantine: The Economics of Australia's Ban on New Zealand Apple Imports, 50th Annual Conference of the Australian and Resource Economics Society, Sydney, NSW, 8-10.
  8. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H., 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation.
  9. Baker, K. F. and Cook R. J., 1974, Biological Control of Plant Pathogens, Freeman Sanfrancisco.
  10. Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T. and Swanson, J. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual.
  11. Bateman, I. and Willis, K., 2002, Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, New York : Oxford University Press.
  12. Breukers, A., Mourits, M., Werf, W. V. D., and Lansink, A. O., 2008, Cost and Benefit of Controlling Quarantine Diseases: A Bio-economic Modeling Approach, Agricultural Economics, 38(2): 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00288.x
  13. EarthTramper Consulting Inc., 2005, Fire Blight of Apple and Pear in Canada: Economic Importance and a Strategy for Sustainable Management of the Disease.
  14. H. Waibel, 1986, The Economics of Integrated Pest Control in Irrigated Rice, Crop Protection Monographs, Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
  15. Haab T. C. and McConnel, K. E., 2002, Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: the Econometrics of Non-market Valuation, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  16. Keller, R. P., Lodge, D. M., and Finnoff, D. C., 2007, Risk Assessment for Invasive Species Produces Net Bioeconomic Benefits, Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1): 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605787104
  17. Kodama, T., M. Watanabe, and R. Kada, 2000, Economic Analysis of Food Security by CVM, Agricultural Economic Research. Proceeding of the Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, 2000: 49-51.
  18. Lopez-Feldman, A., 2012, Introduction to Contingent Valuation Using Stata.
  19. Mullen, J. D., Norton, G. W., and Reaves, D. W., 1997, Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits of Integrated Pest Management, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29(2): 243-253.
  20. McFadden, D., 1994, Contingent Valuation and Social Choice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(4): 689-708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243732
  21. Palti, J., 1981, Cultural Practices and Infectious Crop Diseases, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences 9, New York : Springer-Verlag.
  22. Peterson, E., Orden, D., and Roberts, D. H., 2006, Linking Risk and Economic Assessments in the Analysis of Plant Pest Regulations: The Case of US Imports of Mexican Avocados, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  23. Siikamaki, J., 1997, Value of Decreased Use of Pesticides? A Contingent Valuation Study on Consumers' Willingness to Pay, Agricultural Economics Reseasrch Institute, Research Reports 217.
  24. Wittwer, G., McKirdy, S., and Wilson, R., 2006, Analysing a Hypothetical Pierce's Disease Outbreak in South Australia using a Dynamic CGE Approach, Monash University, Centre of Policy Studies and the Impact Project.
  25. Wright, K. B., 2005, Researching Internet-based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3) : 00-00.