Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Modified Metric of FMEA for Risk Evaluation Based on ASIL of Safety System

ASIL에 기초하여 수정된 안전시스템 FMEA 위험평가척도

  • Baek, Myoung-Sig (Busan & Gyeongnam Regional Division, Korean Foundation for Quality) ;
  • Jang, Hyeon Ae (Department of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuck Moo (Department of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 백명식 (한국품질재단 부산경남지역본부) ;
  • 장현애 (부경대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 권혁무 (부경대학교 시스템경영공학부)
  • Received : 2014.07.12
  • Accepted : 2014.11.28
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to suggest a modified approach that compensates some shortcomings of RPN with relevant strength of ASIL for Safety System and suggests systematic and logical approach for FMEA. Methods: By comparing the objectives, determination procedures, and key conceptual differences of RPN and ASIL, a refined method of risk evaluation and a new risk metric are devised. Results: While the traditional FMEA provides only rough evaluation of relative risk for each failure, the proposed method compensates its shortcomings with relevant strength of ASIL and provides a more logical and practical procedure of risk evaluation. Conclusion: The new metric RPM provides not only a comparative priority rank but also the degree of physical seriousness. Besides, it may have even more benefits for various applications if the severity can be expressed as mone tary amount of losses.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdelgawad, M., and Fayek, A. R. 2010. "Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 136:1028-1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210
  2. Agung, S., and Kwon, H. 2010. "An Expected Loss model f or Risk Prioritization in Service FMEA." Calif ornia Journal of Operations Management 8:27-38.
  3. Agung, S., and Kwon, H. 2012. "Corrective Action Strategy based on SWOT Analysis in Service FMEA." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40:25-38. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.1.025
  4. Bertolini, M., Braglia, M., and Carmignani, G. 2006. "An FMECA-based Approach to Process Analysis." International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking 20:127-145.
  5. Chang, D. S., and Sun, K. L. P. 2009. "Applying DEA to enhance assessment capability of FMEA." International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 26:629-643. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910966165
  6. Chang, K. H., and Cheng, C. H. 2010. "A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA." International Journal of Systems Science 41:1457-1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720903353633
  7. Chang, K. H., and Cheng, C. H. 2011. "Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method." journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22:113-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0266-x
  8. Chang, K. H., Cheng, C. H., and Chang Y. C. 2010. "Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique." Soft Computing 14:285-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0403-7
  9. Chen, J. K. 2007. "Utility Priority Number Evaluation for FMEA." Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 5:321-328.
  10. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B. 2009. "Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis." Decision Support Systems 48:246-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.08.005
  11. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B. 2009. "Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach." Computers and Operations Research 36:1768-1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.05.002
  12. Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation. 2008. FMEA Reference Manual, 4th ed.
  13. Ellims, M., and Monkhouse, H. E. 2012. "AGONISING OVER ASILS: Controllability and the In-Wheel Motor." System Safety, Proceedings at The Incorporation the cyber security conference, 1-8.
  14. Eubanks, C. F., Kmenta, S., and Ishii, K. 1997. "Advanced FMEA Using behavior Modeling." Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, California: Sacramento, 1-10.
  15. Ford Design Institute. 2004. FMEA handbook, Version 4.1.
  16. Gargama, H., and Chaturvedi, S. K. 2011. "Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic." IEEE transactions on Reliability 60:102-110. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2103672
  17. Ireson, W. G., Coombs, Jr. C. F., and Moss, R. Y. 1996. "Handbook of reliability engineering and management Second Edition." McGraw-Hill.
  18. ISO 26262-1. 2011. Road vehicles -Functional safety-part 1: Vocabulary.
  19. ISO 26262-3. 2011. Road vehicles -Functional safety-part 3: Concept phase.
  20. ISO 26262-4. 2011. Road vehicles -Functional safety-part 4: Product development at the system level.
  21. ISO 26262-5. 2011. Road vehicles -Functional safety-part 5: Product development at the hardware level.
  22. Jeegadeshan, C., Arunachalam, V. P., Devadasan, S. R., and Srinivasan, P. S. S. 2007. "Design and Development of Modified Service FMEA Model." International Journal of Service and Operations Management 1:111-126.
  23. Kim, H., and Lee, N. 2012. "The Case Study on Sof tware FMEA for the Efficient Improvement of Functional Safety." KSAE 2012 Conference, 1303-1308.
  24. Kutulu, A. C., and Ekmekcioglu, M. 2012. "Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP." Expert Systems with Applications 39:61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
  25. Kwon, H. M., Hong, S. H., Lee, M. K., and Agung, S. 2011. "Risk Evaluation Based on the Time Dependent Expected Loss Model In FMEA." Journal of the Korea Society of Safety 6:104-110.
  26. Linton, J. D. 2003. "Facing the challenges of service automation: An enabler for e-commerce and productivity gain in traditional service." IEEE Trans, Eng., Manage 4:478-487.
  27. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., and Xu, P. C. 2011. "Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory." Expert Systems with Applications 38:4403- 4415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.110
  28. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., and Liu, N. 2013. "Risk Evaluation Approaches in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Literature Review." Expert Systems with Applications 40:828-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
  29. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., and Mao, L. X. 2012. "Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment." Expert Systems with Applications 39:12926-12934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
  30. Onodera, K. 1997. "Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage." Proceeding of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 50-56.
  31. Oolkalkar, A. D., Joshi, A. G., and Oolkalkar, D. S. 2009. "Quality Improvement in Haemodialysis Process Using FMEA." International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 8:817-830.
  32. Reiling, J. G., Knutzen, B. L., and Stoechlein, M. 2003. "FMEA-the cure for medical errors." Qual. Progr. 8:67-71.
  33. Sankar, N. R., and Prabhu, B. S. 2001. "Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis." International journal of Qaulity & Reliability Management 3:324-335.
  34. Sawhney, R., Padiyar, A., and Li, Y. 2004. "FMEA based approach for supplier development." Proceedings of IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition 7-16.
  35. Shahin, A. 2004. "Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: An exploratory examination." Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage 21:731-746. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710410549082
  36. Tay, K. M., and Lim, C. P. 2010. "Enhancing the failure mode and effect analysis methodology with fuzzy inference techniques." Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 21:135-146.
  37. Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B. 2009. "Risk Evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean." Expert Systems with Applications 36:1195-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028
  38. Xiao, N. C., Huang, H. Z., Li, Y. F., He, L. P., and Jin, T. D. 2011. "Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA." Engineering Failure Analysis 18:1162-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004
  39. Xie, Y., Li, J., and Zhang, A. 2011. "Extended FMEA Method Applied in the Field of Functional Safety." Maintainability and Safety(ICRMS), 9th International Conference on Reliability, 615-618.
  40. Yang, J., Huang, H. Z., He, L. P., Zhu, S. P., and Wen, D. 2011. "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty." Engineering Failure Analysis 18:2084-2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.014
  41. Zammori, F., and Gabbrielli, R. 2011. "ANP/RPN: A multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number." Quality and Reliability Engineering International 28:85-104.
  42. Zhang, H., Li, W., and Quin, J. 2010. "Model-based Functional Safety Analysis Method for Automotive Embedded System Application." International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing, China: Dalian. August 13-15.
  43. Zhang, Z. F., and Chu, X. N. 2011. "Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty." Expert Systems with applications 38:206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.046
  44. Zhao, X. 2011. "A Process Oriented Quality Control Approach Based on Dynamic SPC and FMEA." Int. J. of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice 18:444-451.

Cited by

  1. Risk Evaluation in FMEA when the Failure Severity Depends on the Detection Time vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.4.136