DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Additives on the Yield and Pathogenicity of Conidia Produced by Solid State Cultivation of an Isaria javanica Isolate

  • Kim, Jeong Jun (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Xie, Ling (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Han, Ji Hee (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang Yeob (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2014.09.03
  • Accepted : 2014.11.10
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Recently, the Q biotype of tobacco whitefly has been recognized as the most hazardous strain of Bemisia tabaci worldwide, because of its increased resistance to some insecticide groups. As an alternative control agent, we selected an Isaria javanica isolate as a candidate for the development of a mycopesticide against the Q biotype of sweet potato whitefly. To select optimal mass production media for solid-state fermentation, we compared the production yield and virulence of conidia between 2 substrates (barley and brown rice), and we also compared the effects of various additives on conidia production and virulence. Barley was a better substrate for conidia production, producing $3.43{\times}10^{10}$ conidia/g, compared with $3.05{\times}10^{10}$ conidia/g for brown rice. The addition of 2% $CaCO_3+2%$ $CaSO_4$ to barley significantly increased conidia production. Addition of yeast extract, casein, or gluten also improved conidia production on barley. Gluten addition (3% and 1.32%) to brown rice improved conidia production by 14 and 6 times, respectively, relative to brown rice without additives. Conidia cultivated on barley produced a mortality rate of 62% in the sweet potato whitefly after 4-day treatment, compared with 53% for conidia cultivated on brown rice. The amendment of solid substrate cultivation with additives changed the virulence of the conidia produced; the median lethal time ($LT_{50}$) was shorter for conidia produced on barley and brown rice with added yeast extract (1.32% and 3%, respectively), $KNO_3$ (0.6% and 1%), or gluten (1.32% and 3%) compared with conidia produced on substrates without additives.

Keywords

References

  1. De Barro PJ, Liu SS, Boykin LM, Dinsdale AB. Bemisia tabaci: a statement of species status. Annu Rev Entomol 2011; 56:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085504
  2. Scott IA, Workman PJ, Drayton GM, Burnip GM. First record of Bemisia tabaci biotype Q in New Zealand. N Z Plant Prot 2007;60:264-70.
  3. Jones DR. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur J Plant Pathol 2003;109:195-219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022846630513
  4. Oliveira MR, Henneberry TJ, Anderson P. History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot 2001;20:709-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00108-9
  5. Lee M, Kang S, Lee S, Lee HS, Choi JY, Lee GS, Kim WY, Lee SW, Kim SG, Uhm KB. Occurrence of the B- and Qbiotypes of Bemisia tabaci in Korea. Korean J Appl Entomol 2005;44:169-75.
  6. Kim EH, Sung JW, Yang JO, Ahn HG, Yoon C, Seo MJ, Kim GH. Comparison of insecticide susceptibility and enzyme activities of biotype B and Q of Bemisia tabaci. Korean J Pestic Sci 2007;11:320-30.
  7. Wraight SP, Carruthers RI, Jaronski ST, Bradley CA, Garza CJ, Galaini-Wraight S. Evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus for microbial control of the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. Biol Control 2000;17:203-17. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1999.0799
  8. Faria M, Wraight SP. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci with fungi. Crop Prot 2001;20:767-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00110-7
  9. Al-Deghairi MA. Bioassay evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana Vuellemin against eggs and nymphs of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Pak J Biol Sci 2008;11:1551-60. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1551.1560
  10. Cabanillas HE, Jones WA. Pathogenicity of Isaria sp. (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) against the sweet potato whitefly B biotype, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Prot 2009;28:333-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.11.015
  11. Saito T, Sugiyama K. Pathogenicity of three Japanese strains of entomopathogenic fungi against the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. Appl Entomol Zool 2005;40:169-72. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2005.169
  12. Cuthbertson AG, Walters KF. Pathogenicity of the entomopathogenic fungus, Lecanicillium muscarium, against the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci under laboratory and glasshouse conditions. Mycopathologia 2005;160:315-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-005-0122-2
  13. Meekes ET, Fransen JJ, van Lenteren JC. Pathogenicity of Aschersonia spp. against whiteflies Bemisia argentifolii and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. J Invertebr Pathol 2002;81:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00150-7
  14. Zhu H, Kim JJ. Susceptibility of the tabacco whitfly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype Q to entomopathogenic fungi. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2011;21:1471-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2011.636482
  15. de Faria MR, Wraight SP. Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: a comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol Control 2007;43:237-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.001
  16. Jackson MA, Dunlap CA, Jaronski ST. Ecological considerations in producing and formulating fungal entomopathogens for use in insect biocontrol. BioControl 2010;55:129-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-009-9240-y
  17. Qiu Z, Song F, Qiu Y, Li X, Guan X. Optimization of the medium composition of a biphasic production system for mycelial growth and spore production of Aschersonia placenta using response surface methodology. J Invertebr Pathol 2013; 112:108-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2012.10.010
  18. Vega FE, Jackson MA, Mercadier G, Poprawski TJ. The impact of nutrition on spore yields for various fungal entomopathogens in liquid culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2003;19:363-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023924304456
  19. Kleespies RG, Zimmermann G. Effect of additives on the production, viability and virulence of blastospores of Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Sci Technol 1998;8:207-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159830270
  20. Srikanth J, Santhalakshmi G. Effect of media additives on the production of Beauveria brongniartii, an entomopathogenic fungus of Holotrichia serrata. Sugar Tech 2012;14:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0152-2
  21. Maldonado-Blanco MG, Gallegos-Sandoval JL, Fernandez- Pena G, Sandoval-Coronado CF, Elias-Santos M. Effect of culture medium on the production and virulence of submerged spores of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana against larvae and adults of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 2014;24:180-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.855164
  22. Shi Z, Li M, Zhang L. Effects of nutrients on germination of Verticillium lecanii (= Lecanicillium sp.) conidia and infection of greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2006;16:599-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150500532832
  23. Safavi SA, Shah FA, Pakdel AK, Reza Rasoulian G, Bandari AR, Butt TM. Effect of nutrition on growth and virulence of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007;270:116-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00666.x
  24. Shah FA, Wang CS, Butt TM. Nutrition influences growth and virulence of the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005;251:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.08.010
  25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS $OnlineDoc^{(R)}$ 9.1.3. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2012.
  26. Jackson MA, Cliquet S, Iten LB. Media and fermentation processes for the rapid production of high concentrations of stable blastospores of the bioinsecticidal fungus Paecilomyces fumosoroseus. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2003;13:23-33.
  27. Jackson MA, McGuire MR, Lacey LA, Wraight SP. Liquid culture production of desiccation tolerant blastospores of the bioinsecticidal fungus Paecilomyces fumosoroseus. Mycol Res 1997;101:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756296002067
  28. Jackson MA. Method for producing desiccation tolerant Paecilomyces fumosoroseus spores. U.S. Patent No. 5968808. Beltsville: Department of Agriculture, United States of America; 1997.
  29. Sahayaraj K, Namasivayam SK. Mass production of entomopathogenic fungi using agricultural products and by products. Afr J Biotechnol 2008;7:1907-10.
  30. Li DP, Holdom DG. Effects of nutrients on colony formation, growth, and sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Invertebr Pathol 1995; 65:253-60. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1995.1039
  31. Ibrahim L, Butt TM, Jenkinson P. Effect of artificial culture media on germination, growth, virulence and surface properties of the entomopathogenic hyphomycete Metarhizium anisopliae. Mycol Res 2002;106:705-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756202006044
  32. Holdom DG, van de Klashorst G. Inexpensive culture media and methods for Nomuraea rileyi. J Invertebr Pathol 1986; 48:246-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(86)90131-X
  33. Sun M, Liu X. Carbon requirements of some nematophagous, entomopathogenic and mycoparasitic hyphomycetes as fungal biocontrol agents. Mycopathologia 2006;161:295-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-006-0249-9
  34. Derakhshan A, Rabindra RJ, Ramanujam B, Rahimi M. Evaluation of different media and methods of cultivation on the production and viability of entomopathogenic fungi, Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas. Pak J Biol Sci 2008;11: 1506-9. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1506.1509
  35. Iskandarov US, Guzalova AG, Davranov KD. Effects of nutrient medium composition and temperature on the germination of conidia and the entomopathogenic activity of the fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Appl Biochem Microbiol 2006;42:72-6. https://doi.org/10.1134/S000368380601011X