DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Easy, Rapid, and Cost-Effective Method for DNA Extraction from Various Lichen Taxa and Specimens Suitable for Analysis of Fungal and Algal Strains

  • Park, Sook-Young (Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Jang, Seol-Hwa (Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Oh, Soon-Ok (Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jung A (Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Hur, Jae-Seoun (Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University)
  • Received : 2014.08.27
  • Accepted : 2014.10.18
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Lichen studies, including biodiversity, phylogenetic relationships, and conservation concerns require definitive species identification, however many lichens can be challenging to identify at the species level. Molecular techniques have shown efficacy in discriminating among lichen taxa, however, obtaining genomic DNA from herbarium and fresh lichen thalli by conventional methods has been difficult, because lichens contain high proteins, polysaccharides, and other complex compounds in their cell walls. Here we report a rapid, easy, and inexpensive protocol for extracting PCR-quality DNA from various lichen species. This method involves the following two steps: first, cell breakage using a beadbeater; and second, extraction, isolation, and precipitation of genomic DNA. The procedure requires approximately 10 mg of lichen thalli and can be completed within 20 min. The obtained DNAs were of sufficient quality and quantity to amplify the internal transcribed spacer region from the fungal and algal lichen components, as well as to sequence the amplified products. In addition, 26 different lichen taxa were tested, resulting in successful PCR products. The results of this study validated the experimental protocols, and clearly demonstrated the efficacy and value of our KCl extraction method applied in the fungal and algal samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. Ainsworth and Bisby's dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 2001.
  2. Ahmadjian V. Lichens are more important than you think. BioScience 1995;45:124. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioscience/45.3.124
  3. Hawksworth DL, Honegger R. The lichen thallus a symbiotic phenotype of nutritionally specialized fungi and its response to gall producers. In: Williams MA, editor. Plant galls: organisms, interactions, populations. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994. p. 77-98
  4. Oksanen I. Ecological and biotechnological aspects of lichens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006;73:723-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0611-3
  5. James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, Celio G, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miadlikowska J, et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 2006;443:818-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05110
  6. Crespo A, Bridge PD, Hawksworth DL. Amplification of fungal rDNA-ITS regions from non-fertile specimens of the lichen-forming genus Parmelia. Lichenologist 1997;29:275-82.
  7. Landvik S, Shailer NF, Eriksson OE. SSU rRNA sequence support for a close relationship between the Elaphomycetales and the Eurotiales and Onygenales. Mycoscience 1996;37: 237-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461292
  8. DePriest PT. Small subunit rDNA variation in a population of lichen fungi due to optional group-I introns. Gene 1993; 134:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90175-3
  9. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315-22.
  10. Molina MC, Crespo A. Comparison of development of axenic cultures of five species of lichen-forming fungi. Mycol Res 2000;104:595-602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756299002014
  11. Aras S, Cansaran D. Isolation of DNA for sequence analysis from herbarium material of some lichen specimens. Turk J Bot 2006;30:449-53.
  12. Armaleo D, Clerc P. A rapid and inexpensive method for the purification of DNA from lichens and their symbionts. Lichenologist 1995;27:207-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282995000235
  13. Cubero OF, Crespo A, Fatehi J, Bridge PD. DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbariumstored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Syst Evol 1999;216: 243-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084401
  14. Grube M, DePriest PT, Gargas A, Hafellner J. DNA isolation from lichen ascomata. Mycol Res 1995;99:1321-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81215-X
  15. Chi MH, Park SY, Lee YH. A quick and safe method for fungal DNA extraction. Plant Pathol J 2009;25:108-11. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2009.25.1.108
  16. Piercey-Normore MD, DePriest PT. Algal switching among lichen symbioses. Am J Bot 2001;88:1490-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558457
  17. Fang G, Hammar S, Grumet R. A quick and inexpensive method for removing polysaccharides from plant genomic DNA. Biotechniques 1992;13:52-4, 56.
  18. Jobes DV, Hurley DL, Thien LB. Plant DNA isolation: a method to efficiently remove polyphenolics, polysaccharides, and RNA. Taxon 1995;44:379-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1223408
  19. Thomson D, Henry R. Single-step protocol for preparation of plant tissue for analysis by PCR. Biotechniques 1995;19:394-7, 400.