DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dental Age Estimation in Adults: A Review of the Commonly Used Radiological Methods

  • Jeon, Hye-Mi (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jang, Seok-Min (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Oral Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Heo, Jun-Young (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ok, Soo-Min (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sung-Hee (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Woo (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2014.09.24
  • Accepted : 2014.10.20
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques which focus on radiological methods in Korean adults. The literature from 1995 through July 31, 2014, was searched, using PubMed, for publications in English language. In PubMed, the keywords 'tooth' OR 'dental' AND 'pulp' AND 'age estimation' were searched. Inclusion criteria was comprised of the following: the subjects were living adults and dental radiography (excluded computed tomography [CT] and cone-beam CT) was used to measure the pulpal size. Twenty articles that met the criteria were selected. The method of age estimation using dental radiographs for measuring pulp and tooth size was represented in all studies. The methods were assorted into three categories generally; Kvaal's, Ikeda's and Cameriere's methods. Those methods had certain limitations such as large error range and low correlation coefficient depending on populations, type of employed teeth and particular method. Various techniques and many studies have been published for age estimation from human teeth using dental radiographs, but those techniques showed various predictability and reliability. Therefore, future studies on larger samples with well-distributed age group using not only existing techniques but new techniques are necessary for deriving convincing results.

Keywords

References

  1. Stavrianos Ch, Mastagas D, Stavrianou I, Karaiskou O. Dental age estimation of adults: a review of methods and principals. Res J Med Sci 2008;2:258-268.
  2. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Belcastro MG, Bonfiglioli B, Rastelli E, Cingolani M. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by peri-apical X-rays. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:166-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00336.x
  3. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9-17.
  4. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 1995;74:175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-G
  5. Bosmans N, Ann P, Aly M, Willems G. The application of Kvaal's dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 2005;153:208-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.017
  6. Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B. Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms--a contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med 2005;119:27-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0492-x
  7. Meinl A, Tangl S, Pernicka E, Fenes C, Watzek G. On the applicability of secondary dentin formation to radiological age estimation in young adults. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:438-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00377.x
  8. Landa MI, Garamendi PM, Botella MC, Aleman I. Application of the method of Kvaal et al. to digital orthopantomograms. Int J Legal Med 2009;123:123-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0268-9
  9. Saxena S. Age estimation of indian adults from orthopantomographs. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:225-229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011005000009
  10. Kanchan-Talreja P, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. An assessment of the versatility of Kvaal's method of adult dental age estimation in Indians. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.020
  11. Agarwal N, Ahuja P, Sinha A, Singh A. Age estimation using maxillary central incisors: A radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:97-100. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109897
  12. Erbudak HO, Ozbek M, Uysal S, Karabulut E. Application of Kvaal et al.'s age estimation method to panoramic radiographs from Turkish individuals. Forensic Sci Int 2012;219:141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.012
  13. Limdiwala PG, Shah JS. Age estimation by using dental radiographs. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013;5:118-122. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.119778
  14. Karkhanis S, Mack P, Franklin D. Age estimation standards for a Western Australian population using the dental age estimation technique developed by Kvaal et al. Forensic Sci Int 2014;235:104.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.008
  15. Drusini AG, Toso O, Ranzato C. The coronal pulp cavity index: a biomarker for age determination in human adults. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997;103:353-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199707)103:3<353::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-R
  16. Igbigbi PS, Nyirenda SK. Age estimation of Malawian adults from dental radiographs. West Afr J Med 2005;24:329-333.
  17. Karkhanis S, Mack P, Franklin D. Age estimation standards for a Western Australian population using the coronal pulp cavity index. Forensic Sci Int 2013;231:412.e1-6.
  18. Babshet M, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. Age estimation in Indians from pulp/tooth area ratio of mandibular canines. Forensic Sci Int 2010;197:125.e1-4.
  19. Jeevan MB, Kale AD, Angadi PV, Hallikerimath S. Age estimation by pulp/tooth area ratio in canines: Cameriere's method assessed in an Indian sample using radiovisiography. Forensic Sci Int 2011;204:209.e1-5.
  20. Zaher JF, Fawzy IA, Habib SR, Ali MM. Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary incisors among Egyptians using dental radiographic images. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18:62-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.12.004
  21. Babshet M, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio (PTR) in an Indian sample: a preliminary comparison of three mandibular teeth used alone and in combination. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18:350-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2011.07.003
  22. Cameriere R, De Luca S, Aleman I, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in lower premolars by orthopantomography. Forensic Sci Int 2012;214:105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.028
  23. Tsatsoulis IN, Filippatos CG, Floratos SG, Kontakiotis EG. Estimation of radiographic angles and distances in coronal part of mandibular molars: A study of panoramic radiographs using EMAGO software. Eur J Dent 2014;8:90-94. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126254
  24. Kvaal S, Solheim T. A non-destructive dental method for age estimation. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1994;12:6-11.
  25. Ikeda N, Umetsu K, Kashimura S, Suzuki T, Oumi M. Estimation of age from teeth with their soft X-ray findings. Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi 1985;39:244-250.
  26. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Variations in pulp/tooth area ratio as an indicator of age: a preliminary study. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:317-319.
  27. Cameriere R, Brogi G, Ferrante L, et al. Reliability in age determination by pulp/tooth ratio in upper canines in skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:861-864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00159.x
  28. Cameriere R, Cunha E, Sassaroli E, Nuzzolese E, Ferrante L. Age estimation by pulp/tooth area ratio in canines: study of a Portuguese sample to test Cameriere's method. Forensic Sci Int 2009;193:128.e1-6.
  29. Cameriere R, Cunha E, Wasterlain SN, et al. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in lateral and central incisors by peri-apical X-ray. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:530-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.02.012

Cited by

  1. Overcoming population differences for dental age estimation in adults through pulp/tooth volume calculations: a pilot study vol.52, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1554089