DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconstruction of the Soft Tissue Defect on Anteromedial Surface of the Leg Using Medial Hemisoleus Flap

  • Park, Il-Jung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Sur, Yoo-Joon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • You, Sung-Lim (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.20
  • 심사 : 2014.09.29
  • 발행 : 2014.11.30

초록

Purpose: Anteromedial surface of the leg is susceptible to trauma, which frequently induces soft tissue defect. When the size of a soft tissue defect is small to moderate, a local muscle flap is an easy and reliable alternative to a free flap. The authors performed medial hemisoleus flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects on the anteromedial surface of legs. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the medial hemisoleus flap. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients underwent the medial hemisoleus flap for reconstruction of a soft tissue defect on the anteromedial surface of the leg from February 2009 to December 2013. There were eight males and four females with a mean age of 47.8 years (15 to 69 years). The mean size of defects was $4.7{\times}4.2cm$ ($2{\times}2$ to $9{\times}6cm$). Flap survival and postoperative complications were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up period was 39.6 months (7 to 64 months) and all flaps survived. There were two cases of negligible necrosis of distal margin of the flap, which were healed after debridement. All patients were capable of full weight bearing ambulation at the last follow-up. Conclusion: The medial hemisoleus flap is a simple, reliable procedure for treatment of a small to moderate sized soft tissue defect on the anteromedial surface of the leg.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pu LL. Successful soft-tissue coverage of a tibial wound in the distal third of the leg with a medial hemisoleus muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:245-51.
  2. Pu LL. The reversed medial hemisoleus muscle flap and its role in reconstruction of an open tibial wound in the lower third of the leg. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:59-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000185465.45380.26
  3. Pu LL. Soft-tissue coverage of an open tibial wound in the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the leg with the medial hemisoleus muscle flap. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:639-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000205818.82084.cf
  4. Pu LL. Medial hemisoleus muscle flap: a reliable flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the middle-third tibial wound. Int Surg 2006;91:194-200.
  5. Pu LL. Soft-tissue reconstruction of an open tibial wound in the distal third of the leg: a new treatment algorithm. Ann Plast Surg 2007;58:78-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000250744.62655.38
  6. Pu LL. The laterally extended medial hemisoleus flap for reconstruction of a tibial wound in the distal third of the leg. Eur J Plast Surg 2007;30:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-007-0134-x
  7. Pu LL. Further experience with the medial hemisoleus muscle flap for soft-tissue coverage of a tibial wound in the distal third of the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:2024-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318171240c
  8. Schierle CF, Rawlani V, Galiano RD, Kim JY, Dumanian GA. Improving outcomes of the distally based hemisoleus flap: principles of angiosomes in flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1748-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a65a74
  9. Ata-ul-Haq, Tarar MN, Malik FS, Khalid K, Riaz A, Mehrose MY, et al. Hemisoleus muscle flap, a better option for coverage of open fractures involving middle third of tibia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2009;21:154-8.
  10. Ahmad I, Akhtar S, Rashidi E, Khurram MF. Hemisoleus muscle flap in the reconstruction of exposed bones in the lower limb. J Wound Care 2013;22:635, 638-40, 642.
  11. Tobin GR. Hemisoleus and reversed hemisoleus flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198507000-00015
  12. Fayman MS, Orak F, Hugo B, Berson SD. The distally based split soleus muscle flap. Br J Plast Surg 1987;40:20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(87)90005-1
  13. Sadasivan KK, Ogden JT, Albright JA. Anatomic variations of the blood supply of the soleus muscle. Orthopedics 1991;14:679-83.
  14. Raveendran SS, Kumaragama KG. Arterial supply of the soleus muscle: anatomical study of fifty lower limbs. Clin Anat 2003;16: 248-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10098
  15. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:177-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198167020-00007
  16. Hallock GG. Getting the most from the soleus muscle. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:139-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199602000-00006
  17. Townsend PL. An inferiorly based soleus muscle flap. Br J Plast Surg 1978;31:210-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(78)90084-X
  18. Pu LL. Soft-tissue coverage of an extensive mid-tibial wound with the combined medial gastrocnemius and medial hemisoleus muscle flaps: the role of local muscle flaps revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:e605-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.003