DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Efficient Transmission Scheme of MPEG2-TS over RTP for a Hybrid DMB System

  • Seo, Hyung-Yoon (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Byungjun (Broadcasting & Telecommunications Media Research Laboratory, ETRI) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Deok (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2012.02.24
  • Accepted : 2012.08.13
  • Published : 2013.08.01

Abstract

Hybrid digital multimedia broadcasting (DMB) is a next-generation mobile TV system that combines broadcasting and wireless communication networks and can provide various high-quality multimedia services. However, if a system adheres to the current standard of transmitting the DMB content in the form of MPEG2-TS through wireless networks, it results in a burden on the network due to low transmission efficiency. The reasons for the low transmission efficiency are as follows. First, due to its constant bitrate characteristic, DMB MPEG2-TS includes a considerable amount of needless information, such as NULL packets and stuffing bytes. Second, due to the inflexibility of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) standard, one cannot fully utilize the maximum transmission unit of the network when converting MPEG2-TS to RTP stream for transmission. This paper proposes a new transmission scheme that resolves these problems. Experiment results show that the proposed scheme improves data bitrate transmission efficiency by 8% to 36%, compared to the standard scheme, in the streaming of various real-DMB contents.

Keywords

References

  1. ETSI, "Radio Broadcasting Systems: Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) to Mobile, Portable and Fixed Receivers," EN 300 401, ver. 1.4.1, June 2006.
  2. J.P. Shim, "Korea's Lead in Mobile Cellular and DMB Phone and Services," Commun. AIS, vol. 15, Mar. 2005, pp. 555-566.
  3. ITU-T, "Information Technology - Coding of Audio-Visual Objects - Part 10: Advanced Video Coding," Rec. H.264 l ISO/IEC 14496-10, Mar. 2003.
  4. ISO/IEC, "Information Technology - Coding of Audio-Visual Objects, Part 3: Audio," ISO/IEC 14496-3, Dec. 1999.
  5. W. Joseph et al., "Characterization of Coverage and Indoor Penetration Loss of DVB-H Signal of Indoor Gap Filler in UHF Band," IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 55, no. 3, Sept. 2009, pp. 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2009.2025838
  6. ISO/IEC 14496-1, "Information Technology: Coding of Audio - Visual Object, Part 1: Systems," Nov. 2002.
  7. IETF, "RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video," RFC 2250, Jan. 1998.
  8. IETF, "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control," RFC 3551, July 2003.
  9. ISO/IEC 13818-1:2000, "Information Technology - Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information: Systems," Mar. 2002.
  10. L.L. Peterson, Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.
  11. G. Bianchi, "Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 18, no. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1109/49.840210
  12. M. Jurvansuu et al., "HSDPA Performance in Live Networks," IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., June 2007, pp. 467-471.
  13. IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems - Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN MAC and PHY Specifications," 12 June 2007.
  14. C.K. Kodikara, "Optimal Settings of Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for Efficient Wireless Video Communications," IEE Proc. Commun., vol. 152, no. 5, Oct. 2005, pp. 648-654. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-com:20045067
  15. ETSI, "Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB Specification for Data Broadcasting," ETSI EN 301 192, ver. 1.4.2, Apr. 2008.
  16. IETF, "Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) for Transmission of IP Datagrams over an MPEG-2 Transport Stream (TS)," RFC 4326, Dec. 2005.
  17. T.C. Hong, W.T. Chee, and R. Budiarto, "A Comparison of IP Datagrams Transmission using MPE and ULE over Mpeg-2/DVB Networks," 5th Int. Conf. Inf., Commun., Signal Process., Bangkok, Thailand, 2006, pp. 1173-1177.
  18. G. Xilouris et al., "Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation: Performance Evaluation and Application Perspectives," IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 52, no. 3, Sept. 2006, pp. 374-380. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2006.879938
  19. B. Collini-Nocker and G. Fairhurst, "ULE versus MPE as an IP over DVB Encapsulation," Proc. HET-NETs, 2004, pp. 70-78.
  20. M. Sooriyabandara et al., "A Lightweight Encapsulation Protocol for IP over MPEG-2 Networks: Design, Implementation and Analysis," Comput. Netw., vol. 48, issue 1, May 2005, pp. 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2004.10.006
  21. J.D. Kim et al., "Design and Implementation of DMBonIP Gateway to Provide Internet Based DMB Service," IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 53, no. 1, Feb. 2007, pp. 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2007.339512
  22. B. Bae et al., "An Efficient and Flexible Hybrid Conditional Access System for Advanced T-DMB," ETRI J., vol. 33, no. 4, Aug. 2011, pp. 629-632. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.11.0210.0320

Cited by

  1. A Study of Transmission Structure for IP-based Digital Broadcast Systems vol.21, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5626/ktcp.2015.21.6.430
  2. SVCEval-RA: an evaluation framework for adaptive scalable video streaming vol.76, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3046-y