The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Considerations of Occlusion for Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses

임상가를 위한 특집 1 - 임플란트 고정성 보철물의 교합적 고려사항

  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook national university)
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.04.15
  • Accepted : 2013.04.22
  • Published : 2013.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The proper occlusal design is one of the most important factors for the long-term success. The purpose of this research is to investigate and define occlusal considerations to reduce failure of implant-supported fixed prostheses. The physiological movement of implants is markedly lower than that of natural teeth and they also lack in occlusal sensitivity. Proper occulsal pattern may be assigned to compensate for the biological disadvantages and occlusal contacts must be formed where the cantilever effect is minimized. Moreover, the long-term success can be assured by reducing early occulsal loading to avoid implant overloading and selecting appropriate occlusion material.

Keywords

References

  1. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-44.
  2. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Occlusion and crestal bone resorption: etiology and treatment planning strategies for implants. In McNeil C, editor: Science and practice of occlusion, Chicago, 1997, Quintessence.
  3. Isidor F. Loss of osteointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:43-152.
  4. Misch CE, Bidze MW. Implant protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compend Contin Dent Educ 1994;15:1330-1343.
  5. Jemt T, Lindquist L, Hedegard B. Changes of the general chewing pattern in complete denture wearers after insertion of bridges on osseointegrated oral implants in the lower jaw. Proceedings of the Symposium on Prosthetic Reconstructions on Osseointegrated Implants. Goteborg, Sweden, 1983, pp. 143-150.
  6. Gartner JL, Mushimoto K, Weber HP, Nishimura I. Effect of osseointegrated implants in the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:185-193. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108067
  7. Muhlemann HR, Savdirl S, Rakeitshak KH. Tooth mobility: its cause and significance. J Periodontol 1965;36:148-153. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.2.148
  8. Parfitt GS. Measurement of the physiologic mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960;39:608-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345600390032201
  9. Sekine H, Komiyama Y. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixturesupporting systems. In van Steenberghe D, editor: Tissue integration in oral maxillofacial reconstruction, Amsterdam, 1986, Elsevier.
  10. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparative evaluation of oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant support prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:75-80. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020205.x
  11. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between threshold level. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:549-554.
  12. Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. In "Comtemporary Implant Dentistry" 2nd ed, Misch CE ed, Mosby, St. Louis, 1999, pp. 609-628.
  13. Shultz AW. Comfort and chewing officiency in dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1951;65:38-48.
  14. Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescur M. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:647-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80319-1
  15. Skalak R. Aspects of biomechanical considerations, In Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson TA, editors: Tissue integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, 1985, Quintessence.
  16. Futoshi komine, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo Matsumura. Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Science 2010;52(4):531-539. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.531
  17. Lee TH, Lee SH, Her SB, Chang WG, Lim BS. Effects of surface treatments on the susceptibilities of low temperature degradation by autoclaving in zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2012;100B(5):1334-1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32700
  18. F Beuer, M Stimmelmayr, JF Gueth, D Edelhoff, M. Naumannc. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dental materials 2012;28:449-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.024
  19. PE Spyropoulou, EC Giroux, ME Razzoog, RE Duff. Translucency of shaded zirconia core material. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:304-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60056-5
  20. Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM. Influence of Low- Temperature Environmental Exposure on the Mechanical Properties and Structural Stability of Dental Zirconia. Journal of Prosthodontics 2012;21:363-369 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00838.x
  21. YS Jung, JW Lee, YJ Choi, JS Ahn, SW Shin, JB Huh. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111-5 https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.111