Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Aging Treatment for Microleakage within Composite Resin Restoration

시효처리가 복합레진 수복물의 미세누출에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Yoo, Seunghoon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 유승훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.10.28
  • Accepted : 2013.11.06
  • Published : 2013.11.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, researchers tried to find the effect, if any, of aging treatment to the specimens with three different dentin bonding agents using MicroCT. One, 5th generation - [Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus] and two 6th generation [AdheSE$^{(R)}$, Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$] dentin bonding agents were used in this study. Specimens were divided into 4 groups according to aging treatment method used. Group I : control group, Group II : thermocycled between $5^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$ for 60 seconds dwell time 5,000 times, Group III : aged as Group II and artificially brushed 20,000 times, Group IV : aged as Group III and were stored in artificial saliva for 6 months. With Single bond Plus, Group II showed more microleakage than Group I (p < 0.05). Group II and Group III showed more microleakage than Group IV (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the groups using AdheSE$^{(R)}$ and Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$ (p > 0.05). Among Group I, AdheSE$^{(R)}$ showed more microleakage than Single bond Plus and Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$ (p < 0.05). Among Group II, there were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Among Group III, AdheSE$^{(R)}$ showed more microleakage than Single bond Plus and Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$ (p < 0.05). Among Group IV, AdheSE$^{(R)}$ and Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$ showed more microleakage than Single bond Plus (p < 0.05).

본 연구는 시효처리가 세 가지 상아질 접착제의 미세누출에 미치는 영향을 MicroCT를 이용하여 조사하였다. 5세대 상아질 접착제인 Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus(3M-ESPE, USA)와 6세대 상아질 접착제인 AdheSE$^{(R)}$(Ivoclar Vivadent, Lichtenstein)와 Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$(3M-ESPE, USA)을 이용하였다. 세 가지 상아질 접착제를 이용하여 3MESPE 사의 Filtek$^{TM}$ Z250을 V급 와동에 수복하고 24시간 생리식염수에 보관한 군(I군), 열 순환을 시행한 군(II군), 인공 칫솔질 법을 적용한 군(III군), 인공 타액에 6개월간 보관한 군(IV군)으로 분류하였다. Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus를 이용한 시편은 II군과 III군에서 미세누출의 양이 늘어났으며 IV군에서 감소하였다. I군에 비해 II군이 많은 미세누출을 보였으며(p < 0.05), II군과 III군에 비하여 IV에서 적은 미세누출을 보였다(p < 0.05). AdheSE$^{(R)}$를 이용한 시편은 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$을 이용한 시편은 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). I군에서는 AdheSE$^{(R)}$가 Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus와 Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$에 비해 미세누출이 많다(p < 0.05). II군에서는 상아질 접착제간 차이가 없었다(p > 0.05). III군에서는 AdheSE$^{(R)}$가 Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus와 Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$에 비해 미세누출이 많았다(p < 0.05). IV군에서는 Adper$^{TM}$ Single bond Plus에 비해 AdheSE$^{(R)}$와 Adper$^{TM}$ Prompt$^{TM}$ L-Pop$^{TM}$의 미세누출이 많았다(p < 0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr. : Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 125:687-701, 1994. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0113
  2. Dauvillier BS, Aarnts MP, Feilzer AJ : Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives. J Esthet Dent, 12:291-299, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00238.x
  3. Davy KW, Karachandra S, Pandain MS, et al. : Relationship between composite matrix molecular structure and properties. Biomaterials, 19:2007-2014, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00047-7
  4. Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Poly-merization contraction and conversion of light curing Bis-GMA based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials, 14:871-875, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90010-Y
  5. Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Light initiation of dental resins : dynamics of the polymerization. Biomaterials, 17:2313-2318, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00074-9
  6. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, et al. : Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res, 64:1396-1401, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121501
  7. Goldman M : Polymerization shrinkage of resinbased restorative materials. Aust Dent J, 28:156-161, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1983.tb05272.x
  8. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAC, de Goes MF, et al. : Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent, 27:192-198, 2002.
  9. Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL : Stress transfer from polymerization shrinkage of a chemical-cured composite bonded to a pre-cast composite substrate. Dent Mater, 14:106-111, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00016-5
  10. Puckett AD, Smith R : Method to measure the polymerization shrinkage of light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent, 68:56-58, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90285-I
  11. Bowen RL, Nemoto K, Rapson JE : Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissued ; forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc, 106:475-477, 1983. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0078
  12. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB : Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent, 12:23-32, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00195.x
  13. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB : Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent, 10:88-96, 1997.
  14. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH : Strain gauge measurement of polymerization shrinakge. J Dent Res, 68:977, 1989.
  15. Ruttermann S, Kruger S, Raab WH, et al. : Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materialsa comparative study. J Dent, 35:806-813, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.014
  16. Kim YK, Kim JS, Yoo SH : Comparison of polymerization shrinkage and strain stress of several composite resin using strain guage. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 31: 516-525, 2004.
  17. Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, et al. : Low-shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent Mater J, 26:149-155, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.149
  18. Buonocore MG : A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34:849-853, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  19. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ : Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymerbased restoratives. J Dent, 25:435-440, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00063-2
  20. Eick JD, Welch FH : Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int, 17:103-111, 1986.
  21. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent, 59:297-300, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90176-X
  22. Suliman AH, Boyer DB, Lakes RS : Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins : comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent, 71:7-12, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90247-X
  23. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, et al. : Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent, 3:295-308, 2001.
  24. Wahab FK, Shaini FJ, Morgano SM : The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 90:168-174, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00300-7
  25. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak V, Cuijpers V, et al. : Micro- CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent, 21:393-397, 2008.
  26. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. : Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater, 11:47-51, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80008-5
  27. Burgress JO, Alvarez AN, Stattmiller S : Shear bond strength of five dental bonding agents. J Dent Res, 72:387, 1993.
  28. Kraivixien R, Jaochkarairi P, Nathanson D : Effect of aging on bond strength of dentin adhesives in vitro. J Dent Res, 72:282, 1993.
  29. Gary AC : Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems. J Dent, 6:192-194, 1993.
  30. Hirasawa T, Hirano S, Hirabayashi S, et al. : Initial dimensional change of composites in dry and wet conditions. J Dent Res, 62:28-31, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620010701
  31. Choi, KK : The effect of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res, 79:812-817, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
  32. Pereira PN, Okuda M, Nakajima M, et al. : Relationship between bond strength and nanoleakage : Evaluation of a new assessment method. Am J Dent, 14:100-105, 2001.
  33. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH : The overwet phenomenon : A scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resiondentin interface. Am J Dent, 9:109-114, 1996.
  34. Olmez A, Oztac N, Bilici S : Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts. Quintessence Int, 29:725-729, 1998.
  35. Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL : The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater, 8:181-184, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90079-R
  36. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A : Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent, 25:324-330, 2000.
  37. Frankenberger R, Tay FR : Self-etch vs etch-andrinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater, 21:397-412, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.005
  38. Gueders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, et al. : Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining. Oper Dent, 31:450-455, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-55
  39. Yoo SH, Kim JS : The Study on the microleakage of the restoration with self etching priming/bonding agent. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 31:26-33, 2004.
  40. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, et al. : "Nobottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater, 17:373-380, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  41. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. : A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent, 21:17-24, 1996.
  42. Braden M, Causton EE, Clarke RL : Diffusion of water in composite filling materials. J Dent Res, 55:730-732, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550050501
  43. Yap AU, Wang HB, Siow KS, et al. : Polymerization shrinkage of visible-light-cured composites. Oper Dent, 25:98-103, 2000.
  44. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N : Measurement of water sorption in dental composites. Biomaterials, 19:77-83, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00157-9
  45. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res, 69:36-39, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690010501
  46. Momoi Y, McCabe JF : Hygroscopic expansion of resin based composites during 6 months of water storage. Br Dent J, 5:91-96, 1994.
  47. Calais JG, Soderholm KJ : Influence of filler type and water exposure on flexural strength of experimental composite resins. J Dent Res, 67:836-840, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670050801
  48. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Fisher AC : Hygroscopic expansion and solubility of composite restoratives. Dent Mater, 19:77-86, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00015-5
  49. Segura A, Donly KJ : In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil, 20:495-499, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01636.x
  50. Thonemann BM, Federlin M, Schmalz G, et al. : SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations. Dent Mater, 13:192-197, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80026-7
  51. Yap AU, Shah KC, Chew CL : Marginal gap formation of composites in dentine: effect of water storage. J Oral Rehabil, 30:236-242, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00982.x
  52. Huang C, Tay FR, Cheung GS, et al. : Hygroscopic expansion of a compomer and a composite on artificial gap reduction. J Dent, 30:11-19, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00053-7