DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CO2 Emissions Evaluation for Steel Reinforced Concrete Columns Based on the Optimal Structural Design

최적구조설계를 이용한 SRC 기둥의 CO2 배출량 평가

  • Choi, Se Woon (Division of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeon, Ji Hye (Division of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Hwanyoung (Division of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Yousok (Division of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Hyo Seon (Division of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2013.05.28
  • Accepted : 2013.07.28
  • Published : 2013.10.31

Abstract

Since the seriousness of environmental pollution came to the fore recently, various efforts have been made globally for the reduction of the environmental load. In particular, in the field of construction, an industry responsible for a considerable amount of pollution, studies have been actively conducted to reduce $CO_2$ emissions and energy consumption. However, most conventional research about pollution as it relates to construction is focused on the maintenance stages where $CO_2$ emissions are the greatest. Research related to the design stage is in its infancy, as it has only been conducted thus far on steel buildings and RC buildings. In fact, in order to achieve environmentally friendly construction considering the Life Cycle Assessment(LCA), the building design should be derived to reduce the $CO_2$ emissions from the early building design stage, and structural engineers should be able to suggest a design plan considering its environmental friendliness. In this study, optimal structural design method for steel reinforced concrete(SRC) columns considering $CO_2$ emissions is presented. The trends of $CO_2$ emissions in SRC columns according to the variations of steel shapes, concrete strengths and loads are investigated.

최근 환경오염 문제에 대한 심각성이 대두되며 전 세계적으로 환경부하 저감을 위해 다양한 노력을 쏟고 있다. 특히 환경 저해 산업의 하나인 건설분야에서는 $CO_2$배출량과 에너지 소비량을 줄이기 위해 활발한 연구를 진행해 왔다. 그러나 건설분야의 기존 연구들은 대부분 $CO_2$배출량이 가장 큰 사용 및 유지관리 단계에만 집중하고 있으며, 설계단계에 대한 연구는 2D의 철근콘크리트 부재 및 구조물에 대해서만 실행되었을 정도로 초기단계이다. 사실, LCA적 관점에서 친환경적 건설산업을 이루기 위해서는 건물의 초기설계 단계에서부터 $CO_2$배출량을 저감시키기 위한 방향으로 설계를 유도할 수 있어야 하며, 구조 엔지니어로서 환경성을 고려한 설계안을 제시할 수 있어야 한다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 매입형 합성기둥(SRC)을 대상으로 $CO_2$최적화 기법을 제시하였으며, 이를 통해 얻은 여러 설계단면을 이용하여 SRC기둥의 $CO_2$배출량에 영향을 미치는 3가지 요소((1) 강재 크기, (2) 콘크리트 압축강도, (3) 작용 하중 크기)에 대한 영향관계를 분석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea (2009) Korean Building Code and Commentary (KBC 2009).
  2. Cole, R.J. (1998) Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Construction of Alternative Structural systems, Building and Environment, 34(3), pp.335-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00020-1
  3. De T'Serclaes, Ph. (2007) Financing Energy Efficient Homes: Existing Policy Responses to Financial Barriers, International Energy Agency, Paris.
  4. Gartner, E. (2004) Industrially Interesting Approaches to "low-$CO_2$" Cements, Cement and Concrete Research, 34(9), pp.1489-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021
  5. Guggemos, A.A., Horvath, A. (2005) Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel-and Concrete-Framed Buildings, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(2), pp.93-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93)
  6. Hong, T., Ji, Ch., Jang, M., Park H. (2012) Predicting the $CO_2$ Emission of Concrete Using Statistical Analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2(2), pp.53-60. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2012.2.2.053
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report.
  8. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (www.kict.re.kr)
  9. Moon, K.S. (2008) Sustainable Structural Engineering Strategies for Tall Building, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 17(5), pp.895-914. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.475
  10. Paya-Zaforteza, I., Yepes, V., Hopitaler, A., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F. (2009) $CO_2$-Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Simulated Annealing, Engineering Structures, 31(7), pp.1501-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.034
  11. Radhi, H. (2010) On the Optimal Selection of Wall Cladding System to Reduce Direct and Indirect $CO_2$ Emissions, Energy, 35(3), pp.1412-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.026
  12. Sartori, I., Hestnes, A.G. (2007) Energy Use in the Life Cycle of Conventional and Low-energy Buildings: A Review Article, Energy and Buildings, 39(3), pp. 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001
  13. Saw, H.S., Liew, J.Y.R. (2000) Assessment of Current Methods for the Design of Composite Columns in Buildings, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 53(2), pp.121-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00062-0
  14. Seo, J.H., Kwon, B.K., Kim, S.B., Park, H.S. (2009) Structural Cost Optimization Techniques for High-rise Buildings Frame Systems Using High-strength Steels, Journal of the Computational Structure Engineering, 22(1), pp.53-63.
  15. Seo, J.H., Kwon, B.K., Kim, S.B., Park, H.S. (2009) Structural Optimization of High-rise Buildings Using High-strength Steels, Journal of the Computational Structure Engineering, 22(3), pp.277-287.
  16. Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., Rivard, H. (2005) Applying Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms in Green Building Design Optimization, Building and Environment, 40(11), pp.1512-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017
  17. Yang, L., Zmeureanu, R., Rivard, H. (2008) Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Two Residential Heating Systems, Building and Environment, 43(6), pp.1072-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.02.007
  18. Yeo, D., Gabbai, R.D. (2011) Sustainable Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures through Embodied Energy Optimization, Energy and Buildings, 43(8), pp.2028-2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.014
  19. Zhang, Z., Wu, X., Yang, X., Zhu, Y. (2006) BEPAS-A Life Cycle Building Environmental Performance Assessment Model, Building and Environmental, 51(5), pp.669-675.