DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Organic Components and Osteoinductivity in Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Material

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Junho (Korea Tooth Bank, R&D Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Um, In-Woong (Korea Tooth Bank, R&D Institute) ;
  • Murata, Masaru (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido) ;
  • Ito, Katsutoshi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido)
  • Received : 2013.08.06
  • Accepted : 2013.11.26
  • Published : 2013.11.30

Abstract

Purpose: Extensive research is actively ongoing for development of an ideal bone substitute that meets the gold standard. Tooth was selected as a donor site for evaluation of potentials in bone substitutes based on its similar chemical compositions to alveolar bone. Previous studies have evaluated inorganic components of autogenous tooth bone graft material (AutoBT) and osteoconductivity. In continuation from the previous studies, the current study was conducted for analysis of organic components and evaluation of osteoinductivity of AutoBT. Methods: Forty-six extracted teeth were collected from actual patients (Korea Tooth Bank, R&D Institute). Extracted teeth were processed into AutoBT and implanted in dorsal subcutaneous muscular tissues of 15 athymic mice. Biopsy samples were harvested at two, five, and eight weeks. The Bradford assay, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gradient gel, and western blotting were performed for investigation of organic contents of AutoBT. Results: Histology analyses showed signs of new bone formation as early as two weeks. Results of the Bradford assay indicated the existence of noncollagenous proteins (NCP). 0.29% (2.89 mg/g) of proteins were extracted by weight in the root portion of AutoBT; 0.02% (0.029 mg/g) and 1.79% (17.93 mg/g) of proteins were measured by weight in crown and block-form of AutoBT, respectively. However, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was not observed in AutoBT. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the current study, AutoBT induced new bone formation by NCP embedded in dentin.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  2. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:778-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198312000-00005
  3. Bang G, Urist MR. Bone induction in excavation chambers in matrix of decalcified dentin. Arch Surg 1967;94:781-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330120035008
  4. Bessho K, Tagawa T, Murata M. Purification of rabbit bone morphogenetic protein derived from bone, dentin, and wound tissue after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80204-6
  5. Butler WT, Mikulski A, Urist MR, Bridges G, Uyeno S. Noncollagenous proteins of a rat dentin matrix possessing bone morphogenetic activity. J Dent Res 1977;56:228-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345770560030601
  6. Conover MA, Urist MR. Transmembrane bone morphogenesis by implants of dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1979;58:1911. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580091201
  7. Urist MR, Nakata N, Felser JM, et al. An osteosarcoma cell and matrix retained morphogen for normal bone formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(124):251-66.
  8. Urist MR, Mikulski A, Boyd SD. A chemosterilized antigen- extracted autodigested alloimplant for bone banks. Arch Surg 1975;110:416-28. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360100058011
  9. Yeomans JD, Urist MR. Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7
  10. Kawai T, Urist MR. Bovine tooth-derived bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1989;68:1069-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680060301
  11. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965; 150:893-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  12. Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:7442-5. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4857
  13. Ike M, Urist MR. Recycled dentin root matrix for a carrier of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:124-32. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0124:RDRMFA>2.3.CO;2
  14. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971;50:1392-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345710500060601
  15. Urist MR, Iwata H, Ceccotti PL, et al. Bone morphogenesis in implants of insoluble bone gelatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1973;70:3511-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3511
  16. Saygin NE, Tokiyasu Y, Giannobile WV, Somerman MJ. Growth factors regulate expression of mineral associated genes in cementoblasts. J Periodontol 2000;71:1591-600. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.10.1591
  17. Feng JQ, Luan X, Wallace J, et al. Genomic organization, chromosomal mapping, and promoter analysis of the mouse dentin sialophosphoprotein (Dspp) gene, which codes for both dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem 1998;273:9457-64. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.16.9457
  18. Ritchie HH, Ritchie DG, Wang LH. Six decades of dentinogenesis research. Historical and prospective views on phosphophoryn and dentin sialoprotein. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106 Suppl 1:211-20.

Cited by

  1. Osteogenic Potential of Demineralized Dentin Matrix as Bone Graft Material vol.26, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.26.223
  2. Demineralized Dentin Matrix as a Carrier of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: in Vivo Study vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.27.219
  3. Physicochemical and osteogenic properties of chairside processed tooth derived bone substitute and bone graft materials vol.40, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-341
  4. Autogenous Mineralized Dentin versus Xenograft granules in Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implantation in Post‐extraction Sites: A Randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow vol.32, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13765