DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vertebral Distraction during Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Causes Postoperative Neck Pain

  • Ha, Seung Man (Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong Hoon (Department of Neurology, CHA University) ;
  • Oh, Seung Hun (Department of Neurosurgery, TeunTeun Hospital) ;
  • Song, Ji Hwan (Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Hyoung Ihl (Department of Medical Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Dong Ah (Department of Medical Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2012.08.26
  • 심사 : 2013.05.13
  • 발행 : 2013.05.28

초록

Objective : Vertebral distraction is routinely performed during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Overdistraction can injure the facet joints and may cause postoperative neck pain consequently. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of distraction force during ACDF. Methods : This study included 24 consecutive patients with single level cervical disc disease undergoing single level ACDF. We measure the maximum torque just before the the arm of the Caspar retractor was suspended by the rachet mechanism by turning the lever on the movable arm using a torque meter. In order to turn the lever using the torque driver, we made a linear groove on the top of the lever. We compared the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the high torque group (distraction force>6 $kgf{\cdot}cm$) and the low torque group (distraction force${\leq}6kgf{\cdot}cm$) at routine postoperative intervals of 1, 3, 5 days and 1, 3, 6 months. Results : The VAS scores for posterior neck pain had a linear correlation with torque at postoperative 1st and 3rd days ($y=0.99{\times}-1.1$, $r^2=0.82$; $y=0.77{\times}-0.63$, $r^2=0.73$, respectively). VAS scores for posterior neck pain were lower in the low torque group than in the high torque group on both 1 and 3 days postoperatively ($3.1{\pm}1.3$, $2.6{\pm}1.0$ compared with $6.0{\pm}0.6$, $4.9{\pm}0.8$, p<0.01). However, the difference in NDI scores was not statistically significant in all postoperative periods. Conclusion : Vertebral distraction may cause posterior neck pain in the immediate postoperative days. We recommend not to distract the intervertebral disc space excessively with a force of more than 6.0 $kgf{\cdot}cm$.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aryan HE, Newman CB, Lu DC, Hu SS, Tay BK, Bradford DS, et al. : Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy : a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 22 : 100-104, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318168d9c0
  2. Bailey RW, Badgley CE : Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42-A : 565-594, 1960
  3. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM : Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25 : 491-502, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198910000-00001
  4. Cloward RB : The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15 : 602-617, 1958 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602
  5. Demetropoulos CK, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN, Yang KH : Development and calibration of a load sensing cervical distractor capable of withstanding autoclave sterilization. Med Eng Phys 27 : 343-346, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.09.003
  6. Frank E, Chamberland D, Ragel B : A proposed technique for intraoperative measurement of cervical spine stiffness. Neurosurgery 39 : 147-150, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199607000-00030
  7. Goffin J, Plets C, Van den Bergh R : Anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization according to Caspar : a prospective study of 41 patients with fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 25 : 865-871, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198912000-00003
  8. King JS, Lagger R : Sciatica viewed as a referred pain syndrome. Surg Neurol 5 : 46-50, 1976
  9. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ : The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica : a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22 : 181-187, 1991
  10. Leclaire R, Fortin L, Lambert R, Bergeron YM, Rossignol M : Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain : a placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 1411-1416; discussion 1417, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200107010-00003
  11. Lee KE, Thinnes JH, Gokhin DS, Winkelstein BA : A novel rodent neck pain model of facet-mediated behavioral hypersensitivity : implications for persistent pain and whiplash injury. J Neurosci Methods 137 : 151-159, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.02.021
  12. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KM, Fellows B : Cervical medial branch blocks for chronic cervical facet joint pain : a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 1813-1820, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f88
  13. Olsewski JM, Garvey TA, Schendel MJ : Biomechanical analysis of facet and graft loading in a Smith-Robinson type cervical spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 2540-2544, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199411001-00008
  14. Panjabi MM : Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13 : 371-379, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00044-0
  15. Truumees E, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Herkowitz HN : Effects of disc height and distractive forces on graft compression in an anterior cervical discectomy model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 2441-2445, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211150-00005
  16. Truumees E, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Herkowitz HN : Effects of disc height and distractive forces on graft compression in an anterior cervical corpectomy model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 1438-1441, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c315
  17. Winkelstein BA, Santos DG : An intact facet capsular ligament modulates behavioral sensitivity and spinal glial activation produced by cervical facet joint tension. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 856-862, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b4710

피인용 문헌

  1. Factors Affecting the Nonlinear Force Versus Distraction Height Curves in an In Vitro C5-C6 Anterior Cervical Distraction Model vol.30, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000160
  2. Rare Intractable Cervicalgia Related to Exaggerated Disc Height Distraction : Report of Two Cases and Literature Review vol.61, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0186
  3. Relationship between facet joint distraction during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for trauma and functional outcome vol.b100, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b9.bjj-2018-0199.r1
  4. The aiming device for cervical distractor pin insertion: a proof-of-concept, feasibility study vol.22, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04533-w