DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Difference of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignments between Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

  • Lim, Jae Kwan (Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung Min (Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.07.16
  • Accepted : 2013.02.04
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences of spinopelvic parameters between degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSPL) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (ISPL) patients. Methods : Thirty-four patients with DSPL and 19 patients with ISPL were included in this study. Spinopelvic parameters were evaluated on whole spine X-rays in a standing position. The following spinopelvic parameters were measured : pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis from C7 plumb line (SVA). The population of patients was compared with a control population of 30 normal and asymptomatic adults. Results : There were statistically significant differences in LL (p=0.004) and SVA (p=0.005) between the DSPL and ISPL group. The LL of DSPL ($42{\pm}13^{\circ}$) was significantly lower than that of the control group ($48{\pm}11^{\circ}$; p=0.029), but that of ISPL ($55{\pm}6^{\circ}$) was significantly greater than a control group (p=0.004). The SVA of DSPL ($55{\pm}49$ mm) was greater than that of a control group (<40 mm), but that of ISPL ($21{\pm}22$ mm) was within 40 mm as that of a control group. The PT of DSPL ($24{\pm}7^{\circ}$) and ISPL ($21{\pm}7^{\circ}$) was significantly greater than that of a control group ($11{\pm}6^{\circ}$; p=0.000). Conclusion : Both symptomatic DSPL and ISPL patients had a greater PI than that of the asymptomatic control group. In conclusion, DSPL populations are likely to have global sagittal imbalance (high SVA) compared with ISPL populations because of the difference of lumbar lordosis between two groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P : Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16 : 1459-1467, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6
  2. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, Roussouly P : Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 61 : 981-986; discussion 986, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303194.02921.30
  3. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A : Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10 : 83-87, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198501000-00013
  4. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P : A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis : the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20 : 451-462, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368136
  5. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW : An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 1351-1358, 1995
  6. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, Lenke LG : Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 2026-2029, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200209150-00011
  7. Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C : Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 575-586, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200003010-00008
  8. Jackson RP, McManus AC : Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 1611-1618, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199407001-00010
  9. Korovessis P, Dimas A, Iliopoulos P, Lambiris E : Correlative analysis of lateral vertebral radiographic variables and medical outcomes study short-form health survey : a comparative study in asymptomatic volunteers versus patients with low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 15 : 384-390, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200210000-00007
  10. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Transfeldt E, O'Brien M, Chopin D, et al. : Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance : a correlation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 2049-2054, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000138279.53439.cc
  11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C : Pelvic incidence : a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7 : 99-103, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050038
  12. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON : Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 70 : 707-721, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823262ea
  13. Meyerding H : Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54 : 371-377, 1932
  14. Oh SK, Chung SS, Lee CS : Correlation of pelvic parameters with isthmic spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J 3 : 21-26, 2009 https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2009.3.1.21
  15. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illés T : The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 15 : 24-30, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200202000-00004
  16. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T : The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26 : 104-108, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-001-0317-1
  17. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J : Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 346-353, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
  18. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, et al. : Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane : approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7 : 335-342, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198207000-00003
  19. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J : Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11 : 80-87, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000224
  20. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH : Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 211-215, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801150-00012

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment between Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spinal Stenosis vol.55, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.55.6.331
  2. Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters in Skeletally Mature Patients With Scheuermann Disease vol.39, pp.18, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000460
  3. Influence of Pelvic Rotation on Pelvic Incidence, Pelvic Tilt, and Sacral Slope vol.39, pp.21, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000532
  4. Comparison of radiographic sagittal spinopelvic alignment between skeletally immature and skeletally mature individuals with Scheuermann’s disease vol.24, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3595-1
  5. Progressive restoration of spinal sagittal balance after surgical correction of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis before skeletal maturity vol.22, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.spine1412
  6. Retrolisthesis as a Compensatory Mechanism in Degenerative Lumbar Spine vol.57, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.3.178
  7. A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2015.12.2.60
  8. The role of sacral slope in lumbosacral fusion: a biomechanical study vol.23, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.spine14557
  9. Characterization of radiographic features of consecutive lumbar spondylolisthesis vol.95, pp.46, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005323
  10. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters in 2-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis : A retrospective study vol.95, pp.50, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005417
  11. Sagittal Pelvic Radius in Low-Grade Isthmic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis of Chinese Population vol.59, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.292
  12. Differences of Sagittal Lumbosacral Parameters between Patients with Lumbar Spondylolysis and Normal Adults vol.129, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.181972
  13. Prognostic Importance of Spinopelvic Parameters in the Assessment of Conservative Treatment in Patients with Spondylolisthesis vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.277
  14. Difference of Sagittal Alignment between Adolescents with Symptomatic Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and the General Population vol.8, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29260-6
  15. Correlation between the sagittal spinopelvic alignment and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study vol.19, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2073-z
  16. Two-level reverse Bohlman transsoseous approach for treatment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis vol.33, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1525481
  17. Characteristics of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Degenerative Disease vol.126, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.067
  18. Characteristics of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Degenerative Disease vol.126, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.067
  19. What is the difference in pedicle morphology of the fifth lumbar vertebra between isthmic and degenerative L5-S1 spondylolisthesis? An anatomic study of 328 patients via multi-slice spiral computed to vol.30, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06884-3