References
- Adamowicz, WP, Boxall, MW and Louviere, J (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, American J. of Agricultural Economics, 80, pp. 64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269
- Bhat, CR (1997). An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel, Transportation Science, 31, pp. 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.31.1.34
- Boxall, PC and Adamowicz, WL (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach, Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, pp. 421-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619
- Bujosa, A, Riera, A and Hicks, RI (2010). Combining discrete and continuous representations of preference heterogeneity: a latent class approach, Environmental and Resource Economics 23, pp. 477-493.
- Colombo, S., N. Hanley and J. Louviere (2009). Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture. Agricultural Economics. 40: 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00377.x
- Glenk, K and Colombo. S (2011). Modelling outcome-related risk in choice experiments, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 18th Annual Conference, 30 June, 2011. Rome.
- Green, WH and Hensher, DA (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit, Transportation Research Part B, 37, pp. 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00046-2
- Hausman, J and McFadden, D (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model, Econometrica, 52, pp. 1219-1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910997
- Hensher, DA, Ross, JM and Green, WH (2005). Applied Choice Analysis : A Primer, Cambrridge.
- Hess, S, Bierlaire, M and Polak, JW (2005). Capturing correlation and taste heterogeneity with mixed GEV models, Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental Economics, Scarpa, R and Alberini, A (eds.), Springer Publishers.
- Hynes, S, Hanley, N and Scarpa, R (2008). Effect on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American J. of Agricultural Economics 90, pp. 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01148.x
- Kim, DG, Yoo, BK, Kim, JG, Shin, HK, Kim, HS, Park, DH, Ahn, JH and Ahn, KS (2009). Study on assessment of value and functions of Dam-wetlands(2) - Assessment of value by CE : Focussing on Boryung Dam - J. of Wetlands Research, 11(3), pp. 133-143. [Korean Literature]
- Kim, YJ (2007). The effect of heterogeneous preference on non-market valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 16(4) pp. 873-900. [Korean Literature]
- Kosenius, AK (2010). Heterogeneous preferences for water quality attributes: the case of eutrophication in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea, Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 528-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.030
- Meyerhoff, J and Liebe, U (2008). Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ?, Environmental Resource Economics, 39, pp. 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9134-3
- McFadden, D (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, Frontier in Econometrics, Zarembka, P (eds.), Academic Press.
- Ruto, E, Garrod, G and Scarpa, R (2008). Valuing animal genetic resources: a choice modeling application to indigenous cattle in Kenya, Agricultural Economics. 38, pp. 89-98.
- Swait, JR (1994). A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data, J. of Retailing and Consumer Services 1, pp. 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6989(94)90002-7
- Yoo, BK, Kwak, JW, Kim, HS and Kim JG (2010). Effectiveness analysis of constructed washland : (2) economic valuation, J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 30(1B), pp. 133-143. [Korean Literature]
- Train, KE (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge.
Cited by
- Forecasting for the Demand on Water Amenity Zones in the Large Rivers Based on Regional Characteristics and Monthly Variation vol.17, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.4.436