DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conduits for Coronary Bypass: Strategies

  • Barner, Hendrick B. (Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis University Hospital)
  • Received : 2013.08.31
  • Accepted : 2013.09.05
  • Published : 2013.10.05

Abstract

Strategic planning is integral to any operation but complexity varies immensely and therefore the effort necessary to create the optimal plan. The previous three reports have discussed individual conduits and herein is an attempt to present approaches to common situations which the author favors. Although much has been learned over 45 years about use and subsequent behavior of venous and arterial grafts we continue to learn and, as a result, evolve new strategies or modify those now popular. Thus the reader must recognize that in spite of trying to be balanced and inclusive all surgeons have personal opinions and also prejudices which influence the approach taken and which may not be the optimal one for others or for the patient.

Keywords

References

  1. Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013;381:629-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5
  2. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2375-84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211585
  3. Wu C, Camacho FT, Zhao S, et al. Long-term mortality of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and stenting with drug-eluting stents. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.073
  4. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1467-76. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110717
  5. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009;373:1190-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3
  6. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice MC, et al. Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:1006-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt017
  7. Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, et al. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010;122:949-57. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.911669
  8. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070829
  9. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008;359:677-87. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072771
  10. Davierwala P, Mohr FW. Five years after the SYNTAX trial: what have we learnt? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt267
  11. Emmert MY, Seifert B, Wilhelm M, Grunenfelder J, Falk V, Salzberg SP. Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:1499-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.031
  12. Cao C, Manganas C, Horton M, et al. Angiographic outcomes of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.014
  13. Dreifaldt M, Mannion JD, Bodin L, Olsson H, Zagozdzon L, Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:105-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.102
  14. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358:870-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X
  15. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:2005-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.070
  16. Parsa CJ, Shaw LK, Rankin JS, et al. Twenty-five-year outcomes after multiple internal thoracic artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:970-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.093
  17. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2470-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318
  18. Girerd N, Magne J, Rabilloud M, et al. The impact of complete revascularization on long-term survival is strongly dependent on age. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1166-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.023
  19. Halbersma WB, Arrigoni SC, Mecozzi G, et al. Four-year outcome of OPCAB no-touch with total arterial Y-graft: making the best treatment a daily practice. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:796-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.104
  20. Dimitrova KR, Hoffman DM, Geller CM, Dincheva G, Ko W, Tranbaugh RF. Arterial grafts protect the native coronary vessels from atherosclerotic disease progression. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:475-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.035
  21. Deo SV, Shah IK, Dunlay SM, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:862-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.068
  22. Sa MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, et al. Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:849-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt012
  23. Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease. Circulation 2012;126:1023-30. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624
  24. Hemo E, Mohr R, Uretzky G, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with diabetes receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:586-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.024
  25. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Royse AG. Total arterial coronary revascularization: techniques and results in 3,220 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2093-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01150-9
  26. Barner HB, Sundt TM 3rd, Bailey M, Zang Y. Midterm results of complete arterial revascularization in more than 1,000 patients using an internal thoracic artery/radial artery T graft. Ann Surg 2001;234:447-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200110000-00004
  27. Kim KB, Cho KR, Jeong DS. Midterm angiographic follow- up after off-pump coronary artery bypass: serial comparison using early, 1-year, and 5-year postoperative angiograms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:300-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.044
  28. Glineur D, D'hoore W, de Kerchove L, et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:980-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.017
  29. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205361
  30. Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2093-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.027
  31. Dincer B, Barner HB. The "occluded" internal mammary artery graft: restoration of patency after apparent occlusion associated with progression of coronary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:318-20.
  32. Barner HB. Remodeling of arterial conduits in coronary grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1341-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03028-4
  33. Suzuki T, Asai T, Nota H, et al. Early and long-term patency of in situ skeletonized gastroepiploic artery after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:90-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.018
  34. Eda T, Matsuura A, Miyahara K, et al. Transplantation of the free gastroepiploic artery graft for myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:880-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.050
  35. Cho KR, Hwang HY, Kim JS, Jeong DS, Kim KB. Comparison of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery Y grafts anastomosed to the left internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:744-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.109
  36. Buxton BF, Hayward PA. The art of arterial revascularization-total arterial revascularization in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:543-51.
  37. Vassiliades TA Jr. Alternate technique of routing the in situ right internal mammary artery to graft the left anterior descending artery and its branches. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1064-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04112-7
  38. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Luciani N, Maddestra N, Di Nardo E, Angelini R. Composite arterial conduits for a wider arterial myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)91097-9
  39. Sakaguchi G, Tadamura E, Ohnaka M, Tambara K, Nishimura K, Komeda M. Composite arterial Y graft has less coronary flow reserve than independent grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:493-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03729-3
  40. Sabik JF 3rd, Stockins A, Nowicki ER, et al. Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting? Circulation 2008;118(14 Suppl):S210-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.760827
  41. Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Location of the second internal mammary artery graft does not influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1378-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.055
  42. Hayward PA, Zhu YY, Nguyen TT, Hare DL, Buxton BF. Should all moderate coronary lesions be grafted during primary coronary bypass surgery? An analysis of progression of native vessel disease during a randomized trial of conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:140-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.050
  43. Tector AJ, Amundsen S, Schmahl TM, Kress DC, Peter M. Total revascularization with T grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:33-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)90361-1
  44. Wendler O, Hennen B, Markwirth T, et al. T grafts with the right internal thoracic artery to left internal thoracic artery versus the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: flow dynamics in the internal thoracic artery main stem. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:841-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70053-X
  45. Affleck DG, Barner HB, Bailey MS, et al. Flow dynamics of the internal thoracic and radial artery T-graft. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1290-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.113
  46. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Frati G, Proietti P, Giunti G, Leacche M. Lambda graft with the radial artery or free left internal mammary artery anastomosed to the right internal mammary artery: flow dynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1275-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02834-X
  47. Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Musumeci F, Stassano P. Serial evaluation of flow in single or arterial Y-grafts to the left coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1712-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.092
  48. Medalion B, Mohr R, Frid O, et al. Should bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting be used in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting? Circulation 2013;127:2186-93. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001330
  49. Dai C, Lu Z, Zhu H, Xue S, Lian F. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and risk of sternal wound infection: evidence from observational studies. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1938-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.12.038
  50. Vander Salm TJ, Kip KE, Jones RH, et al. What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? Answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:565-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01806-X
  51. Robertson MW, Buth KJ, Stewart KM, et al. Complete revascularization is compromised in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:992-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.052
  52. Repossini A, Tespili M, Saino A, et al. Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:288-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt016
  53. Kelly R, Buth KJ, Legare JF. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is superior to other forms of multiple arterial grafting in providing survival benefit after coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:1408-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.030
  54. Hu X, Zhao Q. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest improves prognosis in high-risk population after coronary artery bypass surgery for good quality grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.067

Cited by

  1. Upper limb arterial pattern: clinical correlation and embryological perspective vol.20, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210008