DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Status of Atmospheric Environmental Impact Assessment and Future Prospects

대기환경영향평가 현황 및 향후 과제

  • Koo, Youn-Seo (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Choi, Dae-Ryun (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Tae (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Lee, Beom-Ku (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Yu, Jung-Min (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hoon (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Cheong, Chang-Yong (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Lim, Jeong-Dae (Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Anyang University)
  • 구윤서 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 최대련 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 김성태 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 이범구 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 유정민 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 이승훈 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 정창용 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 임정대 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과)
  • Received : 2013.09.30
  • Accepted : 2013.10.11
  • Published : 2013.10.31

Abstract

The current status of atmospheric environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been summerized and future prospective for effective and accurate atmospheric EIA has been proposed by reviewing available papers and reports for the atmospheric EIA. The number of reports for the EIA in the EIA support system which is operated by the Korean Environmental Institute have been dramatically decreased from 282 reports in 2008 to 113 reports in 2012 during recent five years. This is partially due to simplification of the EIA procedure, the contraction of the public development and economic recession. We analyzed details of the EIA report to review how actual atmospheric EIA has preformed according to the EIA guidelines from the Korean Ministry of Environment. The 264 reports of EIA published in 2011 and 2012 had been reviewed especially focusing on the atmospheric evaluation items such as meteorology, air quality measurement and modeling, odor measurement and modeling, wind corridor in urban planning, and climate change. In overall sense, the atmospheric EIA has been performed quite well by abiding the guidelines except for local meteorological data measurement, permit standard for air quality and wind corridor. The new approaches to improve the procedure of atmospheric EIA and to reflect future of national air quality standard of $PM_{2.5}$ have been proposed. The guidelines on how to evaluate the wind corridor, to implement atmospheric EIA for $PM_{2.5}$ permit, and how to acquire local meteorological data by combining local measurement and model prediction are required for the effective and future oriented atmospheric EIA.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun, D.W. and J.K.S. Ching (1999) Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. EPA-600/R-99/30.
  2. Changwon Iron and Steel Institute Ltd. (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Iron and Steel General Industrial Complex in Changwon.
  3. Cheonan-si (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Urban Development Projection in Northern Cheonan Complex.
  4. Chungbuk Development Corporation and Korea Industrial Complex Corporation (2012) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Development Project on Osong Second BIo-Health Science Park.
  5. Daemyung-Suan Ltd. (2012) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Urban Development Projection in Jincheon Gyosung Complex.
  6. ENVIRON International Corporation (2005) User's Guide CAMx Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extension Version 4.20.
  7. GYERYONG Ltd. (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Development Project on General Industrial Complex in Jeungpyeong 2.
  8. Jeong, S.J. (2011a) CALPUFF and AERMOD Dispersion Models for Estimating Odor Emisiions from Industrial Complex Area Sources, Asian J. Atmos. Environ., 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2011.5.1.001
  9. Jeong, S.J. (2011b) Estimation of Odor Emissions from Industrial Sources and Their Impact on Residential Areas using the AERMOD Dispersion Model, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 27(1), 87-96. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2011.27.1.087
  10. Kimcheon-si (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Development Project on Kimcheon Second General Industrial Complex.
  11. Korea Environment Corporation (2010) Guidelines for Local Government Greehouse Gas Inventories.
  12. Korea Environment Institute (2002) A Study on Reasonable Estimation and Assessment Method of Environmental Impact.
  13. Korea Environment Institute (2006) Study on Wind flow and Air Quality in Urban Terrain.
  14. Korea Midland Power Corporation Ltd. (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Construction Project on Combined Heat and Power Plant of a Multifunctional Administrative City.
  15. Korea Western Power Corporation Ltd. (2012) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Construction Project on 9, 10 Taean Power Plant.
  16. Kum-Kang Industry Ltd. (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of General Industrial Complex in Jinrye Songhyun.
  17. McMurry, P., M. Shepherd, and J. Vickery (2004) Particulate Matter Assessment for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. ISBN 0 52 184287 5.
  18. Ministry of Environment (2007a) A Study for Improvement of Urban Plan considering Wind Corridor and Air Quality.
  19. Ministry of Environment (2007b) A Study of Utilization Method of Environment Impact Prediction Model for Preparation.
  20. Ministry of Environment (2009a) Guidelines of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents.
  21. Ministry of Environment (2009b) User's Guide for Environmental Impact Prediction Models.
  22. Ministry of Environment (2013a) Guildelines of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents for Greenhouse Gas.
  23. Ministry of Environment (2013b) Odor Analysis Method.
  24. Moon, N.K., Y.S. Lee, Y.H. Kang, and Y.H. Kim (2006) The Application of Air Quality Models on Environment Impact Assessment, 2006, Korea Environment Institute.
  25. MPC Yoolchon Power Ltd. (2012) Environment Impact Assessment Document of LNG Combined Cycle Thermal Power Plant of MPC Yoolchon.
  26. Lee, C.B. and J.C. Kim (2008) Evaluation of the CALPUFF Model Using Improved Meteorological Fields in Complex Terrain of East Sea Coast, J. Korean Soc. Atmos., 25(1), 15-25. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2009.25.1.015
  27. Lee, C.B., J.C. Kim, G.W. Lee, C.U. Ro, and H.K. Kim (2007) Tracer Experiment for the Investigation of Urban Scale Dispersion of Air Pollutants - Simulation by CALPUFF Dispersion Model and Diffusion Feature of Tracer gases, J. Korean Soc. Atmos., 23(4), 405-419. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2007.23.4.405
  28. Lee, H.W., H.Y. Won, H.J. Choi, and H.G. Kim (2005) Numerical Simulation of Effects of Atmospheric Flow Fields Using Surface Observational Data on Dispersion Fields of Air Pollutants in Gwangyang Bay, J. Korean Soc. Atmos., 21(2), 169-178. (in Korean with English abstract)
  29. LG Display Ltd. (2012) Environment Impact Assessment Document of LG Display Plant Expansion Site in 3 Gumi National Industrial Complex.
  30. Pohang-si (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Development Project on General Industrial Complex in Youngilman 4.
  31. POSCO Energy Ltd. (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Construction Project on 1,2 LNG Combined Cycle Thermal Power Plant of Posco Energy.
  32. US Environmental Protection Agency (1998a) AERMOD: Description of Model Formulation.
  33. US Environmental Protection Agency (1998b) Revised Draft User's Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET).
  34. US Environmental Protection Agency (1998c) Revised Draft User's Guide for the AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor (AERMAP).
  35. US Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Modeling Procedures for Demonstrating Compliance with PM2.5 NAAQS.
  36. US Environmental Protection Agency (2011) $PM_{2.5}$ Modeling Implementation for Projects Subject to National Ambient Air Quality Demonstration Requirements Pursuant to New Source Review, Report from NACAA $PM_{2.5}$ Modeling Implementation Workgroup, Washington, DC, January 7, 2011.
  37. US Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Draft Guidance for $PM_{2.5}$ Permit Modeling.
  38. Yongin Mohyun Wangsan Urban Development Project Association (2011) Environment Impact Assessment Document of Urban Development Project in Yongin Mohyun Wangsan.