DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

내측연결형 임플란트에 체결한 지대주의 수직침하에 대하여 반복하중이 미치는 영향

Effect of cyclic loading on axial displacement of abutment into implant with internal tapered connection: a pilot study

  • 설현우 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허성주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 곽재영 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성균 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 한종현 (연세대학교 강남세브란스병원 치과보철과)
  • Seol, Hyon-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.02
  • 심사 : 2013.10.14
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31

초록

연구 목적: 내측연결형 임플란트와 지대주의 연결체에 반복하중을 부여하였을 때 수직 침하를 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 외측연결형 임플란트와 내측연결형 임플란트에 세 종류의 시멘트유지형 지대주를 각각 장착하였다. 즉, 외측연결형 지대주(Ext 그룹), 내측연결형 1-piece 지대주(Int-1 그룹), 내측연결형 2-piece 지대주(Int-2 그룹)를 사용하였으며, 각 그룹마다 7개의 시편을 준비하였다. 임플란트-지대주 연결체에 수직하중을 적용하기 위하여 임플란트 받침대에 고정한 후, 4 Hz의 빈도로 $150{\pm}10N$의 반복하중을 가하였다. 수직침하량은 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, 1,000, 5,000, 10,000회의 반복하중 후에 각각 측정하였다. 반복측정분산분석(RM-ANOVA)를 이용하여 반복하중의 영향을 분석하였으며, 패턴변화를 관찰하기 위하여 선형혼합모형(linear mixed model)을 사용하였다. 유의수준은5% 로 설정하였다. 결과: 10,000회 반복하중 후 수직침하량은, Ext 그룹에서 $0.714{\pm}0.488{\mu}m$, Int-1그룹에서 $5.286{\pm}1.604{\mu}m$, Int-2 그룹에서 $11.429{\pm}1.902{\mu}m$를 나타내었다. 패턴분석에서는, Int-1 그룹 및 Int-2 그룹에서 지속적인 수직침하가 관찰되었으며, Ext그룹에서는 수직침하현상이 관찰되지 않았다. 결론:10,000회 반복하중 후의 선형혼합모형을 통한 분석에서, Ext그룹은 수직침하현상을 보이지 않았으나, Int-1 및 Int-2 그룹은 지속적인 수직침하현상을 나타내었다. 또한, Int-2그룹에서 Int-1그룹보다 더 많은 수직침하량이 관찰되었다.

Purpose: To evaluate the axial displacement of implant-abutment assembly after cyclic loading in internal tapered connection system. Materials and methods: External butt-joint connection implant and internal tapered connection implant were connected with three types of abutment for cement-retained prostheses, i.e. external type abutment (Ext group), internal tapered 1-piece abutment (Int-1 group), and internal tapered 2-piece abutment (Int-2 group). For each group, 7 implants and abutments were used. The implantabutments assemblies were clamped into the implant holder for vertical loads. A dynamic cyclic loading was applied for $150{\pm}10N$ at a frequency of 4 Hz. The amount of axial displacement of the abutment into the implant was calculated at each cycle of 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the overall effect of cyclic loading and the pattern analysis by linear mixed model were used for statistical analysis. Differences at P<.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The mean axial displacement after 10,000 cycles were $0.714{\pm}0.488{\mu}m$ in Ext group, $5.286{\pm}1.604{\mu}m$ in Int-1 group, and $11.429{\pm}1.902{\mu}m$ in Int-2 group. In the pattern analysis, Int-1 and Int-2 group showed continuous axial displacement at 10,000 cycles. There was no declining pattern of axial displacement in the Ext group. Conclusion: The pattern of linear mixed model in Ext group showed no axial displacement. There were continuous axial displacements in abutment-implant assemblies in the Int-1 and Int-2 group at 10,000 cycles. More axial displacement was found in Int-2 group than in Int-1 group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x
  2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  3. Nelson K, Semper W, Hildebrand D, Ozyuvaci H. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years. Int J Oral Max Impl 2008;23:726-32.
  4. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  5. Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent 1993;21:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90127-C
  6. Sutter F, Weber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The New Restorative Concept of the ITI Dental Implant System: Design and Engineering. Int J Periodont Rest 1993;13:408-31.
  7. Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70243-X
  8. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129384
  9. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Max Impl 2000;15:519-26.
  10. Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, Nemoto K, Aida M. Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;75B:457-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30328
  11. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
  12. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1156.x
  13. Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants. J Biomech 2003;36:1649-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00177-5
  14. Dailey B, Jordan L, Blind O, Tavernier B. Axial Displacement of Abutments into Implants and Implant Replicas, with the Tapered Cone-Screw Internal Connection, as a Function of Tightening Torque. Int J Oral Max Impl 2009;24:251-6.
  15. Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02063.x
  16. Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012:1-7.
  17. Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw Loosening with Interchangeable Abutments in Internally Connected Implants After Cyclic Loading. Int J Oral Max Impl 2012;27:42-7.
  18. Richter E-J. In Vivo Vertical Forces on Implants. Int J Oral Max Impl 1995;10:120-40.
  19. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2006;22:176-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.024
  20. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4. 2013.
  21. Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
  22. Bakaeen LG, Winkler S, Neff PA. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2
  23. Wiskott HWA, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Stress Fatigue: Basic Principles and Prosthodontic Implications. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:105-16.

피인용 문헌

  1. 임플란트 단일 치아 수복 시 수직 침하와 인접치와의 위치 변화: 증례 보고 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.126