References
- Hubbert, K. M. and Willis, D. G.,1957, Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing, Petrol. Trans. AIME, T. P. 4597, 210, 153-166.
- Haimson, B. C. and Fairhurst, C., 1967, Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 7, 310-318. https://doi.org/10.2118/1710-PA
- Rummel, F., 1987, Fracture mechanics approach to hydraulic fracturing stress measurements, in Atkinson, B. K., eds., Fracture Mechanics of Rocks, Academic Press, London, 217-239.
- Zoback, M. D. and Haimson, B. C., (Eds), Proc. Workshop on Hydraulic fracturing measurements, U.S. National Committee for Rock Mechanics, National Academy press, Washington, D. C.
- Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfeb, D., Muller, B., 2008, Release of the world stress map available online at www.world-stress-map.org, 2008.
- Ito, T., Evans, K., Kawai, K., Hayashi, K., 1999, Hydraulic fracture reopening pressure and the estimation of maximum horizontal stress, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 36, 811-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00053-4
- Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C. F., Stephansson, O., 2000, Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 37, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00097-0
- Evans, K. F., Scholz, C. H., Engelder, T., 1988, An analysis of horizontal fracture initiation during hydrofracturing stress measurements in granite at North Conway, New Hampshire, Geophysics, 93, 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA01p00251
- Kirsch, G., 1898, Theorie der elastizitat und die Bedurfnisse der festigkeitslehre, Zeit. Ver. dt. Ingenieure, 42, 797-807.
- Haimson, B. C., 1968, Hydraulic fracturing in porous and nonporous rock and its potential for determining in situ stresses at great depth, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, 234p.
- Cornet, F. H., 1982, Analysis of injection tests for in-situ stress determination, In: Proceedings of Workshop Hydraulic fracturing Stress Measurement, Menlo Park, 1982, 414-443.
- Cheung, L. S. and Haimson, B. C., 1989, Laboratory study of hydraulic fracturing pressure data-How valid is their conventional interpretation?, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 26, 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)91440-X
- Bredehoeft, J. D., Wolff, R. G., Keys, W. S., Shutter, E., 1976, Hydraulic fracturing to determine regional in situ stress field, in the Piceance Basin, Colorado, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 87, 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<250:HFTDTR>2.0.CO;2
- Erarslan, N. and Williams, D. J., 2012, Experimental, numerical and analytical studies on tensile strength of rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 49, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.007
- Ye, J. H., Wu, F. Q., Zhang, Y., Ji, H. G., 2012, Estimation of the bi-modulus of materials through deformation measurement in a brazilian disk test, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 52, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.010
- Haimson, B. C. and Cornet, F. H., 2003, ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF), Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 40, 1011-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.002
- Ohoka, M., Funato, A., Takahashi, Y., 1997, Tensile test using hollow cylindrical specimen, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 34, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80028-7
- Ringstad, C., Brevik, I., Addis, M. A., Santarelli, F. J., 1994, Scale effects in hollow cylinder tests, Proc 2nd conference on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Lisbon.
- Yamashita, F., Mizoguchi, K., Fukuyama, E., Omura, K., 2010, Reexamination of the present stress state of the Atera fault system, central Japan, based on the calibrated crustal stress data of hydraulic fracturing tests obtained by measuring the tensile strength of rocks, Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, B04409.
- Haimson, B. C. and Z. Zhao, 1991, Effect of Borehole Size And Pressurization Rate On Hydraulic Fracturing Breakdown Pressure, in Rock Mechanics Contribution and Challenges: Proc. 31st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, 191-199.
- Zoback, M. D. and Pollard, D. D., 1978, Hydraulic fracture propagation and the interpretation of pressuretime records for in situ stress determination. Proc. 19th U.S. Symp. on Rock Mech. 14-22.
- Karfakis, M. G., 1986, A critical review of fracture mechanics as applied to hydraulic fracturing stress measurements. Proc. 1986 SEM Spring Conf. on Expl. Mech., 141-147.
- Jaeger, J. C. and Cook, N. G. W., 1976, Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 2nd ed., 513 pp, Methuen, London.
- ISRM, 1977, International society for rock mechanics, Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 15, 99-103.
- KSRM, 2006, Korean Society for Rock Mechanics, Standard test method for indirect tensile strength of rock by the Brazilian tests, Tunnel and Underground Space, 16, 279-280.
- Chen, C. S., Pan, E., Amadei, B., 1998, Determination of deformability and tensile strength of anisotropic rock using brazilian tests, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 35, 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00329-X
- Kranz, R. L., 1983, Microcracks in rocks: A review, Tectonophysics, 100, 449-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(83)90198-1
- Wong, T. F., 1985, Geometric probability approach to the characterization and analysis of micro cracking in rocks, Mech. Materials, 4, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(85)90023-7
- Lanaro, F., Sato, T., Stephansson, O., 2009, Microcrack modelling of brazilian tensile tests with the boundary element method, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 46, 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.11.007
- Nicksiar, M. and Martin, C. D., 2013, Crack initiation stress in low porosity crystalline and sedimentary rocks, Engineering geology, 154, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.007
- Rocco, C., Guinea, V., Planas, J., Elices, M., 1999a, Size effect and boundary conditions in the brazilian test: Experimental verification, Materials and Structures, 32, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481517
- Rocco, C., Guinea, V., Planas, J., Elices, M., 1999b, Size effect and boundary conditions in the brazilian test: Theoretical analysis, Materials and Structures, 32, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482715
- Claesson, J. and Bohloli, B., 2002, Brazilian test: stress field and tensile strength of anisotropic rocks using an analytical solution, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 39, 991-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00099-0
- Cho, S. H., Ogata, Y., Kaneko, K., 2003, Strain-rate dependency of the dynamic tensile strength of rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 40, 769-777.
Cited by
- Cleavage Dependent Indirect Tensile Strength of Pocheon Granite Based on Experiments and DEM Simulation vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7474/TUS.2016.26.4.316