DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usability Evaluation Criteria for Mobile Navigation Using AHP

  • Jeong, Ye Seul (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hansung University) ;
  • Jeong, Byung Yong (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hansung University)
  • Received : 2013.04.03
  • Accepted : 2013.08.11
  • Published : 2013.10.31

Abstract

Objective: Purposes of this study are selecting main factors in evaluating the usability of mobile navigation and comprehending mutual importance among the factors. Background: Mobile navigation services have been more diffused than ever as the number of smartphone users sharply increased. However users are having trouble with the usage of mobile navigation services due to the lack of research in the area. Method: In order to attain results, general research on mobile navigation, 1st general survey, and 2nd comparative survey on navigation UI experts were performed. Empirical studies about the results were performed using AHP method. Results: As the result of AHP analysis, accuracy was drawn out to be the most important factor followed by accessibility and visibility. Regarding the characteristics of navigation system, the provision of accurate POI(Point of Interest) was considered to be the most important factor for the experts. And effectiveness was considered to be the most important, followed by satisfaction and efficiency. Conclusion: When evaluating the usability of mobile navigation, prior factors such as accuracy, visibility, and aesthetics should be considered in advance and general evaluation concentrated on effectiveness must be performed. Application: The results of this study are expected to be a fundamental data to mobile navigation design.

Keywords

References

  1. Berg Insight, Personal Navigation Devices, LBS Research Series, USA, 2010.
  2. Garcia, E., Martin, C., Garcia, A., Harrison, R. and Flood, D., Systematic analysis of mobile diabetes management applications on different platforms, Information Quality in e-Health Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7058, 2011.
  3. Han, S.H., Park, J.H., Park, J.H., Park, W.K., Kim, H.K. and Hong, S.W., Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods for Mobile Application, Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society of Korea 2012 Spring Conference, 2012.
  4. Harvey, C., Stanton, N.A., Pickering, C.A., McDonald, M. and Zhwng, P., A usability evaluation toolkit for In-Vehicle Information System (IVISs), Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 563-574, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.013
  5. ISO DIS 9241-11, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals(VDT)s - Part 11 Guidance on usability, 1996.
  6. isuppli, Next-Gen Navigation: Is It All About Apps and Maps?, Automotive Research Q3 2009 topical Report - Navigation System, USA, 2009.
  7. Jang, J.A., Trends of Mobile Navigation, DIGIECO report, 2012.
  8. Jang, J.J., A Study on Usability Evaluation Checklist for Mobile Map Service, Master's Thesis, University of KookMin, 2010.
  9. Ji, Y.G., Park, J.H, Lee, C. and Yoon, M.H., A Usability Checklist for the Usability Evaluation of Mobile Phone User Interface, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2006.
  10. KCC and KISA, The first half of 2011, Smartphone Survey, 2011.
  11. Lee, J.K., A Study on Usability Evaluation for Mobile User Interface, Master's Thesis, University of Ewha Womans University, 2005.
  12. Nielsen J., Usability Engineering, Cambridge MA: Academic Press, 1993.
  13. Park, I.K., Research on Analysis of User Interface Design of Navigation System for Automobile, Master's Thesis, University of Sungkyunkwan, 2010.
  14. Pyun, J.M., The Optimization of the Graphic User Interface Usability Evaluation for Mobile Phone, Master's Thesis, University of DanKook, 2005.
  15. Sung, J.E., A study on the improvement plan of POI for efficient transmit of a vehicle navigation screen information, Master's Thesis, University of HanYang, 2008.

Cited by

  1. Development of Usability Evaluation Criteria for Senior-Friendly Autonomous Transportation Robot vol.33, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2014.33.5.407