DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교차로 형태에 따른 차량 당 탄소가스 배출량 비교

Vehicles' CO2 Emissions by Intersection Types

  • 김다예 (경기대학교 공과대학 도시.교통공학과) ;
  • 오흥운 (경기대학교 공과대학 도시.교통공학과)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.27
  • 심사 : 2013.08.08
  • 발행 : 2013.10.15

초록

PURPOSES : The present paper is to compare vehicles' $CO_2$ emissions in roundabouts and signalized intersections. METHODS : The present paper uses the SIDRA software with variables of traffic and road conditions. RESULTS : The results of the study are as follows : First, when entering traffic volumes are more than 1600pcph, vehicle's $CO_2$ emissions in roundabouts are lower than those of signalized intersections regardless of the left turn ratio. Second, When entering traffic volumes are more than 2800pcph, vehicles's $CO_2$ emissions in 2-lane approaches are lower than those of 1-lane approaches in signalized intersection. Third, when entering traffic volumes are more than 1600pcph, vehicle's $CO_2$ emissions of CASE B are lowest. (CASE B is the condition with one exclusive left-turn lane and one exclusive straight lane and one shared straight lane with right-turn.) Also, CASE A is the condition that vehicle's $CO_2$ emissions in roundabouts are lower than those of signalized intersections between 1600pcph and 3600pcph. (CASE A is the condition with one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared straight lane with right-turn.) But, when entering traffic volumes are more than 4000pcph, vehicle's $CO_2$ emissions in signalized intersections is lower than those of roundabouts. CONCLUSIONS : It may be concluded that vehicle's $CO_2$ emissions on roundabouts are much lower than those of signalized intersections, especially, when entering traffics volumes are between 1600pcph and 3600pcph in 1-lane or 2-lane approaches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pakr, Byung-Ho, Jung, Yong-Il. 2005. Performance Evaluation of 4- leg and 1-lane Modern Roundabout Using SIDRA. The Journal of Korean Regional Development Association, Vol.17. No.2. 89-106 (박병호, 정용일(2005) SIDRA를 이용한 4지 1차로 현대식 회전 교차로의 효과 평가. 한국지역개발학회지, 제 17권 제 2호, pp.89-106)
  2. Park, Byung-Ho, Kim, Tae-Young, Han, Sang-Wook, Yang, Jeong- Mo, 2009. Comparative Analysis on the Effictiveness of Modern Roundabouts and 4-legged Signalized Intersections, The Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Transport System, Vol.8, No.2. 27-35 (박병호, 김태영, 한상욱, 양정보(2009) 회전교차로와 4지 신호 교차로 효과에 관한 비교분석. 한국 ITS 학회 논문지, 제 8권 제 2호, pp.27-35)
  3. Han, Su-San, Park, Byung-Ho, 2010. Comparative Analysis on the Delay Between Multi-legged Roundabout and Signalized Intersection, The Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Transport System, Vol.9 No.6. 83-93 (한수산, 박병호(2010) 다지 회전교차로와 신호교차로의 지체 비교 분석, 한국 ITS 학회 논문지, 제 9권 제 6호, pp.83-93)
  4. Pakr, Byung-Ho, Song, Dae-Sup. 2003. Rationalities of Modern Roundabouts in the Intersection Planning. Journal of the Institute of Construction Technology, Vol.22. No.2. 139-151 (박병호, 송대섭(2003) 교차로계획에서 현대식 회전교차로의 도입 타당성. 충북대학교 건설기술논문집 제 22권 제 2호, pp.139-151)
  5. Ahn, Woo-Young, 2012. A Study on Roundabout Signal Metering Operation by Considering Entry Lane's Traffic Volume. International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol.14 No.2. 175-181 (안우영(2011) 진입교통량을 고려한 회전교차로 Signal Metering 운영에 관한 연구, 한국도로학회논문집, 제 14권 제2호, pp.175-181)
  6. Lee, Jung-Beom, Lee Seung-Hoon. 2011. Analysis of the Effect of Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Changign from Signalized Intersection to Roundabout using Tier 3 Method. The Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Transport System, Vol.10, No.5. 105-112 (이정범, 이승훈(2011) Tier 3 방법을 이용한 회전교차로 도입에 따른 CO2 감축 효과, 한국ITS학회논문지, 제 10권 제 5호, pp.105-112)
  7. Lim, Jin-Kang, Park, Byung-Ho. 2011. Comparative Analysis of Operational Effectiveness Related to the Conversion of Rotary to Roundabout in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Road Engineers, Vol.13 No.2, 77-83 (임진강, 박병호(2011) 국내 로터리의 회전교차로 전환에 따른 운영효과 분석. 한국도로학회 논문집, 제 13권 제 2호 pp.77-83) \National of Environmental Research, 2001. An Investigation of Green House Gas Emission From Automobiles (국립환경과학원(2001), 자동차의 온실가스 배출량 조사) \Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2001, Korean Highway Capacity Manual (국토해양부(2013), 도로용량편람) https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2011.13.2.077
  8. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010, Roundabout Design Guideline (국토해양부(2010), 회전교차로 설계지침)
  9. aaSIDRA User Guide. 2000. Akcilik&Associated Pty Ltd
  10. AKCELIK AND ASSOCIATES(2002) aaSIDRA User Guide, Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
  11. Foad Shokri, Hamid Reza Mokhtarian, Amiruddin Ismail, Riza Atiq O.K. Rahmat. 2010. Comparing the Design of Roundabout and Intersection with aaSIDRA Software, European Jounal of Scientific Research, pp.239-246
  12. International Energy Agency(2012) $CO_{2}$ Emissons from Fuel Combustion Highlights 2012 Edition, International Energy Agency
  13. Ranhmi Operating cost, fuel consumption, and emission models in aaSIDRA and aaMOTION. 2007. Akcelik&Associates Pty Ltd
  14. Virginia P. Sisiopiku, Heung-Un Oh(2001) Evaluation of Roundabout Performance Using SIDRA, Journal of Transportation Engineering.