DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulation of Aggregate Slump Test Using Equivalent Sphere Particle in DEM

등가 구형입자를 이용한 DEM에서의 골재 슬럼프 실험 모사

  • Received : 2013.04.10
  • Accepted : 2013.08.12
  • Published : 2013.10.15

Abstract

PURPOSES: Simulation of aggregate slump test using equivalent sphere particle in DEM and its validity evaluation against lab aggregate slump test METHODS : In this research, aggregate slump tests are performed and compared with DEM simulation. To utilize spheric particles in YADE, equivalent sphere diameter concept is applied. As verification measures, the volume in slump cone filled with aggregate is used and it is compared with volume in slump cone filled with equivalent sphere particle. Slump height and diameter are also used to evaluate the suggested numerical method with equivalent concept RESULTS : Simulation test results show good agrement with lab test results in terms of loose packing volume, height and diameter of slumped particle clump. CONCLUSIONS : It is concluded that numerical simulation using DEM is applicable to evaluate the effect of aggregate morphological property in loose packing and optimum gradation determination based on the aggregate slump test simulation result.

Keywords

References

  1. Janno VC. 1998. Quantification of Shape, Angularity, and Surface Texture of Base Course Materials, Special Report 98-1. CRREL. US Army Corps of Engineers.
  2. Kuo CY. Frost JD, Lai JS, Wang LB. 1996. Three- Dimensional Image Analysis of Aggregate Particles from Orthogonal Projections. Transportation. Research. Record 1526. 98-103.
  3. Maerz NH. 2004. Technical and Computational Aspects of the Measurement of Aggregate Shape by Digital Image Analysis. J. Comput. Civil Eng. Vol 18. No. 1. 10-18 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:1(10)
  4. Kwan AKH, Mora CF. 2001. Effect of Various Shape Parameters on Packing of Aggregate Particles. Mag. Concrr. Res. 53 2 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2001.53.2.91
  5. Broek D. 1974.0 Some Contributions of Electron Fractography to the Theory of Fracture. Int. Metallury. Rev. Vol 19. 135-182 https://doi.org/10.1179/095066074790137033
  6. Tang X, De Rooij MR, Van Duynhoven J, Van Breugel K. 2008. Dynamic Volume Change Measurement of Cereal Materials by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy and Videomicroscopy. J Micorsc. Vol 230. No 1. 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01962.x
  7. Hu J., and Stroeven P. 2006. Shape Characterization of Concrete Aggregate. Image Anal Stereol. 43-53
  8. Garboczi Ej. 2002. Three-Dimensional Mathematical Analysis of Particle Shape Using X-ray Tomography and Spherical Harmonics: Application to Aggregates used in Concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. Vol 32. No 10. 1621-1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00836-0
  9. Lin Cl, Miller JD. 2005. 3D Characterization and Analysis of Particle Shape Using X-ray Micorotomography (XMT). Powder Technol. Vol 154. No 1. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.031
  10. Taylor MA, Garboczi EJ, Erdogan ST and Fowler DW. 2006. Some Properties of Irregular 3D Particles. Powder Technol. Vol 162. No 1. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.10.013
  11. Erdgan ST, Fowler DW. 2005. Determination of Aggregate Shape Properties Using x-ray Tomographic Methods and the Effect of Shape on Concrete Rheology. International Center for Aggregates Research.
  12. Kozicki J, Tejchman J. 2011. Numerical Simulations of Sand Behavior Using DEM with Two Different Descriptions of Grain Roughness. International Conference on Particle-based Methods-Fundamental and Applications
  13. Mollon G, Zhao J. 2012. Realistic Generation and Packing of DEM Sand Samples. Advances in Civil, Environmental and Materials Research ACEM
  14. Jo SA, Cho GC, Lee SW. 2009. Evolution of Particle Crushing and Shear Behavior with Respect to Particle Shape Using PFC. Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. Vol. 25 No 10. 41-53.
  15. Hwang TJ, Cho JY, Lee KH. 2010. Gradation Curve of Aggregate Using Digital Image Process. Korean Society of Harzad Mitigation. Vol 10. No 1.
  16. Cho NK, Yoo CS, Lee DY. 2008. Modeling Direct Shear Test of Crushed Stone Using DEM. Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. Vol 24. No 1. 15-23.
  17. Ormel TJ, 2012. Modeling Asphalt with Discrete and Continuum Methods University of Twente
  18. Liu Y. 2011. Discrete Element Methods for Asphalt Concrete: Development and Application of User-Defined Microstructural Models and a Viscoelastic Micromechanical Model. Michigan Technological University
  19. Sallam AM, Ashmawy AK., 2004. The Modified Overlapping Rigid Clusters Method for Modeling Angular Particles Using DEM
  20. He H. 2010. Computational Modeling of Particle Packing in Concrete. Technology Universtiy of Delft
  21. Chen J, Huang, B, Chen F, Shu X. 2012 Application of Discrete Element Method to Superapave Gyratory Compaction. Road Materials and Pavement Design. Vol.13. No. 3. 480-500 https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2012.694160
  22. Lee H, Chou E. 1993. Survey of Image Processing Applications in Civil Engineering Digital Image Processing: Techiques and Applications in Civil Engineering. ASCE Proceedings of the EF/NSF Conference. 203-210
  23. Mora CF, Kwan AKH. 2000. Sphericity, Shape Factor, and Convexity Measurement of Coarse Aggregate for Concrete Using Digital Image Processing. Cement and Concrete Research. 351-358
  24. Kim J, Buttlar W. 2005. Micromechanical Fracture Modeling of Asphalt Mixture Using the Discrete Element Method. Advances in Pavement Engineering. 1-15.
  25. Varvrik WR, Pine WJ, Huber G, Carpenter HS, Bailey R. 2002. Bailey Method for Gradation Selection in HMA Design, Transportation Research Board Circular
  26. Smilauer V, Catalano E, Chareyre B, Dorofeenko S, Duriez J, Gladky A, Kozicki J, Modense C, Scholtes L, Sibille, L, Stransky J, Thoeni K. 2012. Yade Documentation
  27. Huang H. 2010. Discrete Element Modeling of Railroad Ballast Using Imaging based Aggregate Morphology Characterization University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign