International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage-Based Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frames

  • Heo, YeongAe (Offshore Tech. R&D of Marine and Offshore Research Inst., Samsung Heavy Ind.) ;
  • Kunnath, Sashi K. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California)
  • Received : 2013.05.01
  • Accepted : 2013.07.09
  • Published : 2013.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A damage-based approach for the performance-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures is proposed. A new methodology for structural damage assessment is developed that utilizes response information at the material level in each section fiber. The concept of the damage evolution is analyzed at the section level and the computed damage is calibrated with observed experimental data. The material level damage parameter is combined at the element, story and structural level through the use of weighting factors. The damage model is used to compare the performance of two typical 12-story frames that have been designed for different seismic requirements. A series of nonlinear time history analyses is carried out to extract demand measures which are then expressed as damage indices using the proposed model. A probabilistic approach is finally used to quantify the expected seismic performance of the building.

Keywords

References

  1. ATC-40. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (Vol. 1). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
  2. Bracci, J., Reinhorn, A. M., Mander, J. B. & Kunnath, S. K. Deterministic damage model for seismic damage evaluation of RC structures. NCEER report 89-0033. (1989). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York.
  3. Brown, J., & Kunnath, S. K. (2004). Low-cycle fatigue behavior of reinforcing steel bars. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 457-466.
  4. Coffin, L. F. Jr. (1954). A study of the effect of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 76, 931-950.
  5. Coffin, L. F. Jr. (1971). A note on low cycle fatigue laws. Journal of Materials, 6, 388-402.
  6. FEMA-350. (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  7. FEMA-356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  8. Heo, Y. A. (2009). Framework for damage-based probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frames. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis, CA.
  9. Kunnath, S. K., & Chai, Y. H. (2004). Cumulative damagebased inelastic cyclic demand spectrum. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33(4), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.363
  10. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  11. Manson, S. S. (1953). Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress. In Heat Transfer Symposium (pp. 9-75) Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Engineering Research Institute.
  12. Miner, M. A. (1945). Cumulative damage in fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12, A159-A164.
  13. Mo, Y. L., & Wang, S. J. (2000). Seismic behavior of RC columns with various tie configurations. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(10), 1122-1130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1122)
  14. OpenSees. (2011). "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation". Open source software http://opensees.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  15. PEER. (2005). Strong motion database http://peer.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 4 April 2009.
  16. Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(2), 245-252.
  17. Williams, M. S., & Sexsmith, R. G. (1995). Seismic damage indices for concrete structures: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 11(2), 319-349. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585817

Cited by

  1. Maximum Shear Strength of Slender RC Beams with Rectangular Cross Sections vol.141, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001156
  2. Multi-scale modeling and trans-level simulation from material meso-damage to structural failure of reinforced concrete frame structures under seismic loading vol.12, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.11.003
  3. Analytical study of failure damage to 270,000-kL LNG storage tank under blast loading vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.2.201
  4. Preliminary Structural Design of Wall-Frame Systems for Optimum Torsional Response vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0183-2
  5. 구조물 내진 보강용 폴리우레아의 재료 성능 평가 vol.29, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4334/jkci.2017.29.2.131
  6. Nonlocal Formulation for Numerical Analysis of Post-Blast Behavior of RC Columns vol.11, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-017-0201-z
  7. A non-destructive testing methodology for damage assessment of reinforced concrete buildings after seismic events vol.163, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.053
  8. Development of BP-based seismic behavior optimization of RC and steel frame structures vol.164, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.012
  9. Vibration-mode-based story damage and global damage of reinforced concrete frames vol.14, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.589
  10. Nonlinear dynamic response of steel materials and plain plate systems to impact loads: Review and validation vol.173, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.012
  11. Effective Safety Assessment of Aged Concrete Gravity Dam based on the Reliability Index in a Seismically Induced Site vol.11, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11051987