DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accessible Strategy of the Registration & Management of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Patients through the Public-Private Partnership: Policy Implications Fron the Hongcheon-gun Case

민관협력을 통한 고혈압.당뇨병 등록.관리사업의 접근 전략: 홍천군 사례의 정책적 함의

  • Byun, Do-Hwa (Hongcheon-gun Health Center) ;
  • Kim, Eun Jeong (Hongcheon-gun Health Center) ;
  • Park, Myung-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Hyo-Rim (Hongcheon-gun Registration & Education Center for Hypertension and Diabetes) ;
  • Park, Hye-Kyong (Department of Chronic Diseases Management, Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention) ;
  • Kim, Chun-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 변도화 (홍천군 보건소) ;
  • 김은정 (홍천군 보건소) ;
  • 박명배 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 손효림 (홍천군 고혈압당뇨병등록교육센터) ;
  • 박혜경 (질병관리본부 만성질환관리과) ;
  • 김춘배 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2013.08.16
  • Accepted : 2013.09.26
  • Published : 2013.10.01

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to share with experiences of a demonstration program based on a community for prevention and management of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and to supply the evidence of accessible strategies within the community through the public-private partnershipin the near future. Methods: This study case was "the program of registration and management of hypertension and diabetes mellitus patients" which was conducted in Hogncheon-gun in Gangwon-province, 2012. Results: The infrastructure of this center was constructed with the public-private sector partnership according to the basic model of demonstration program since November, 2012. So, the total registered rate of hypertension and diabetes mellitus patients were 26.6% in comparison with suspected patients (to the result of 2011 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 37.8% in comparison with the real number of outpatient (to the claims data of 2011 Branch Honcheon-gun, National Health Insurance Corporation), and 107.8% in comparison with the project goal, sequentially. To the patients who were not treated for 30 and 60 days among the registered patients, a recall service was conducted. Through this intervention, it was monitored that this program has enhanced the consecutive treatment rate of the registered patients. Conclusions: To improve the continuous management of hypertension and diabetes mellitus patients, we are gotten to know that the community need the joint participation and mutual cooperation with public-private sector partnership.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, L. S. (2009). The Effects of continuity of primary care on the hospitalization and the emergency department use for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (Doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Choi, D. Y., Kim, C. S., Sung, E. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2000). The comparison of recognition between non-medicated and medicated group in hypertensive patients. The Journal of the Korean Academy Family Medicine, 21(3), 406-414.
  3. Fitzgerald, J. T., Funnell, M. M., Hess, G. E., Barr, P. A., Anderson, R. M., Hiss, R. G., & Diavis, W. K. (1998). The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care, 21(5), 706-710. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.5.706
  4. Ham, O. K., & Lee, C. Y. (2007). Predictors of health services utilization by hypertensive patients in South Korea. Public Health Nursing, 24(6), 518-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00664.x
  5. Hongcheon-gun (2012). 2012 Hongcheon-gun community health survey. Gangwon-do, Korea: Hongcheon County.
  6. Jafar, H. T., Hatcher, J., Poulter, N., Islam, M., Hashmi, S., Qadri, Z., & Chaturvedi, N. (2009). Community-based interventions to promote blood pressure control in a developing country. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(9), 593-601. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00004
  7. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). The fourth korea national health and nutrition examination surveys (KNHANES IV) 2011. Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea: Osong Health Technology Administration Complex.
  8. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Registration and management for hypertension and diabetes guideline. Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea: Osong Health Technology Administration Complex.
  9. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & Korea University (2010). A study on measuring the economic burden of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases in Korea. Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea: Osong Health Technology Administration Complex.
  10. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & Yeungnam University (2007). Community-based hypertension and diabetes management model development for improving adherence and compliance. Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea: Osong Health Technology Administration Complex.
  11. Korea Foundation for International Healthcare & Yonsei University, (2012). Current status of PPP and strategy development in global health, Seoul, Korea.: Author.
  12. Lee, H. J., Lee, J. J., Hwang, T. Y., & Kam, S. (2012) Development and evaluation of a community staged education program for the cardiocerebrovascular disease high-risk patients. Journal of Agriculture Medicine Community Health, 37(3), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2012.37.3.167
  13. Lee, I. H. (2012). Public-private partnership systems in community welfare. Korean Society for Public Administration, 13(2), 63-82.
  14. Naik, A. D., Kallen, M. A., Walder, A., & Street Jr, R. L. (2008). Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: The effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation, 117, 1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005
  15. Oh, K. K., Kim, Y. M., Lim, J, Y., & Cheong, W. (2012). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus management effects of community based chronic disease management program. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Home Care Nursing, 19(1), 74-82.
  16. Pyo, E. Y., Jung, M. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2012). Factors related to blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 29(3), 15-22.
  17. Quresh, N. N., Hatcher, J., Chaturvedi, N., & Jafar, T. H. (2007). Effect of general practitioner education on adherence to antihypertensive drugs: Cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 335(7628), 1030-1033. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39360.617986.AE
  18. Ren, X., Yan, D., & Huang, B. (1994). The effect of medical treatment on hypertension community control: A follow-up study of more than one thousand hypertensives in East City Proper, Beijing. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 15(3), 145-149.
  19. Rothenbacher, D., Ruter, G., Saam, S., & Brenner, H. (2003). Younger patients with type 2 diabetes need better glycemic control: Results of a community-based study describing factors associated with a high HbA1c value. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 389-391.
  20. Roumie, C. L., Elasy, T. A., Greevy, R., Griffin, M. R., Liu, X., Stone, W. J., & Speroff, T. (2006). Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145, 165-17. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-3-200608010-00004
  21. Song, H. J., Jang, S. M., & Shin, S. K. (2012). Patterns of medical care utilization behavior and related factors among hypertensive patients: Follow-up study using the 2003-2007 Korean health insurance claims data. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 29(2), 1-12.
  22. Statistics Korea (2011). 2010 Annual Report on the Cause of Death, Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=1012&bbs=INDX_001&clas_div=C&rootKey=1.48.0.
  23. Sung, E. J., Kim, Y. S., Choi, D. Y., & Kim, C. S. (2000). The comparison of recognition between non-medicated group in hypertensive patients. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 21(3), 406-414.