한국중재학회지:중재연구 (Journal of Arbitration Studies)
- 제23권3호
- /
- Pages.1-23
- /
- 2013
- /
- 1226-3699(pISSN)
The Word is not Enough - Arbitration, Choice of Forum and Choice of Law Clauses Under the CISG
- Schwenzer, Ingeborg (University of Basel) ;
- Tebel, David (University of Basel)
- 투고 : 2013.08.15
- 심사 : 2013.08.25
- 발행 : 2013.09.02
초록
Form requirements particularly for arbitration clauses are widely perceived as an obstacle for efficiently resolving disputes on an international level. The paper discusses the recent suggestion that the freedom of form principle under Art. 11 CISG extended to arbitration, forum selection, or choice of law clauses in international sales contracts and thus superseded any and all formal requirements in this regard. After analysing national and international form requirements with regard to said clauses, the authors elaborate that while dispute clauses are indeed encompassed by the CISG's scope of application, freedom of form under the CISG was neither intended to nor should it apply to dispute clauses. This result is further confirmed by the interplay of the CISG with other international conventions, first and foremost the 1958 New York Convention, as well as a careful analysis of the so called most-favourable-law-approach.
키워드