Journal of the Korean Society of Safety (한국안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Safety (한국안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of Paper-pencil Test used in Investigation of Control-display Stereotype - Focused on Stereotype for Control-burner Relationship of Four-stove Range -

조종장치-표시장치 스테레오타이프 조사를 위한 설문조사법의 정확성 - 4구 가스렌지 조종장치-버너 연결에 대한 스테레오타이프를 중심으로 -

  • Kee, Dohyung (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 기도형 (계명대학교 경영공학과)
  • Received : 2013.03.03
  • Accepted : 2013.05.20
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate accuracy of paper-pencil test used in surveying control-display stereotype. For doing this, three paper-pencil tests dealing with stereotype for control-burner relationship of four-stove gas range, in which three different gas range images were provided, were performed and the results were compared with those of existing studies. The result of the paper-pencil test using simple image composed of line and circle was different from that of the real model simulation, while the results of the other two tests and a previous study providing more realistic images were the same as that of the real model simulation. Furthermore, the proportion of responses coinciding with the real model simulation increased as images used became closer to real range. It is concluded that the paper-pencil tests well designed using realistic images may produce the same stereotype as the real model simulation.

Keywords

References

  1. P. M. Fitts and R. L. Deninger, "S-R Compatibility: Correspondence among Paired Elements within Stimulus and Response Codes", Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 483-492, 1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054967
  2. E. R. Hoffmann, "Do Paper-and-Pencil Tests Give an Accurate Measure of Stereotype Strength?-A Review of Available Data", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 39, pp. 904-912, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.001
  3. N. E. Loveless, "Direction-of-Motion Stereotypes: A Review", Vol. 5, pp. 357-383, 1962.
  4. A. Chapanis and L. E. Lindenbaum, "A Reaction-time Study of Four Control-Display Linkage", Human Factors, Vol. 1, pp. 1-7, 1959.
  5. R. D. Ray and W. D. Ray, "An Analysis of Domestic Cooker Control Design", Ergonomics, Vol. 22, pp. 1243-1248, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137908924698
  6. D. Shinar and M. B. Acton, "Control-Display Relationships on the Four-Burner Range: Population Streotypes versus Standard", Human Factors, Vol. 20, pp. 13-17, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087802000102
  7. S-P. Wu, "Further Studies on the Spatial Compatibility of Four Control-Display Linkages", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 19, pp. 353-360, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00014-5
  8. D. Kee, "Stereotype and Effective Cues for Burner-Control Relationship of Four-Stove Range", Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 118-123, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2011.37.2.118
  9. D. Kee, "Empirical Study on Stereotype for Burner-Control Relationship of Four-Stove Gas Range for Koreans", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 463-467, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.3.463
  10. S-H. Hsu and Y. Peng, "Control/Display Relationship of the Four-Burner Stove: A Reexamination", Human Factors, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 745-749, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500413