DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Difference of Response Characteristics according to Description and Expression Method of Procedures

절차서의 기술 및 표현 방법에 따른 작업자 반응특성 차이 연구

  • Jang, Tong Il (I&C and Human Factors Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Yonghee (I&C and Human Factors Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Oh, Yeon Ju (I&C and Human Factors Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Yong Hee (I&C and Human Factors Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • 장통일 (한국원자력연구원 계측제어.인간공학연구부) ;
  • 이용희 (한국원자력연구원 계측제어.인간공학연구부) ;
  • 오연주 (한국원자력연구원 계측제어.인간공학연구부) ;
  • 이용희 (한국원자력연구원 계측제어.인간공학연구부)
  • Received : 2013.01.15
  • Accepted : 2013.02.15
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Emergency operating procedures(EOPs) of nuclear power plants should be described considering the cognitive capability and limitation of operators and provide appropriate information in the aspect of human factors. Procedures which doesn't consider cognitive characteristics of operators can become causes of human errors. In previous researches, in order to reduce these problems related to the description of EOP, an improvement suggestion for EOP writer's guide has been proposed, which is reflected human factors aspects that should be considered when describing EOPs. The proposed items, however, have a necessity to be validated because it was listed from various documents such as standards and guidelines without any special validation process. For that reason, in this study, a validation process were performed to show that procedures, which are described in compliance with the requirement items proposed in the improved EOP writer's guide, have positive effects in the aspects of human errors and performance comparing with previous procedures. Experiments were performed to compare the performances of two tasks which are described in compliance with each writer's guide of before and after the improvement During each task was performed in experiments, changes of physiological responses such as EEG and ECG were measured to evaluate the cognitive workload and the stress of operators in each task. And also, as the performance, frequencies of errors and cognition speeds of each task were evaluated. In the results of the experiment, the portions of the ${\beta}$ wave decreased in the tasks overall after the improvement. In the case of ECG, change rates of the mean of R-R interval were decreased in the tasks after improvement. In the results of the performance, the cognition and the response time of the tasks after the improvement were predominant with statistical significancies. Error times in the tasks after improvement were decreased or same to the tasks before improvement. Conclusively, it was validated that the procedures were described in compliance with the improved EOP writer's guide had effects on the reduction of human errors and improvement of performance.

Keywords

References

  1. IAEA, "Good Practices with Respect to the Development and Use of Nuclear Power Plant Procedures", IAEA-TECDOC-1058, 1998.
  2. USNRC, "Lessons Learned from the Special Inspection Program for Emergency Operating Procedures", NUREG-1358, 1992.
  3. USNRC, "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures: Resolution of Comments on NUREG-0799", NUREG-0899, 1992.
  4. T. I. Jang, D. H. Lee and Y. H. Lee, "Suggestion of a Writing Guideline for the Emergency Operating Procedures of Nuclear Power Plants", Proceedings of 2009 Fall Conference of Korean Society of Safety, 2009.
  5. Y. H. Lee, J. W. Lee and T. I. Jang, "A Verification Report for the Execution Ability of Emergency Operating Procedure of Kori Unit 1", HFMP-T028-001, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2007.
  6. D. H. Lee, T. I. Jang and Y. H. Lee, "Suggestion of a New Writer's Guideline to Reduce Human Errors Found in the Emergency Operation Procedures of a Nuclear Power Plant", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 29, No. 1 pp. 129-138, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.1.129
  7. J. S. Ha, "Development of Human Performance Measures for Human Factors Validation in Advanced Nuclear Power Plants", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 85-96, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.3.085
  8. W. D. Jeong, "A Framework for the Support of Predictive Cognitive Error Analysis of Emergency Tasks in Nuclear Power Plants", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 117-124, 2001.
  9. S. N. Byun, "An Evaluation of the Operator Mental Workload of Advanced Control Facilities in Korea Next Generation Reactor", Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 178-186, 2002.
  10. D. A. Norman and D. G. Bobrow, "On Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes", Cognitive Psychology, Vol.7, Issue.1, pp. 44-64, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3
  11. T. I. Jang, J. H., Yun, Y. J. Oh, Y. H. Lee, "Comparison of Task Performance according to the Description Method of Procedures of Nuclear Power Plants", Proceedings of 2011 Fall Conference of Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2011.
  12. T. I. Jang, J. H. Yun, Y. J. Oh, Y. H. Lee, Y. S. Jung, "Comparison of Physiological Difference on Description Methods of Emergency Operating Procedure", Proceedings of 2011 Fall Conference of Korean Society of Safety, 2011.

Cited by

  1. An Experimental Evaluation on Human Error Hazards of Task using Digital Device vol.29, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.1.047