Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings

  • Received : 2012.01.19
  • Accepted : 2012.12.01
  • Published : 2013.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Brittle fracture of structures excited by earthquakes can be prevented by adding a tuned mass damper (TMD). This TMD must be optimum and suitable to the physical conditions of the structure. Compressive strength of concrete is an important factor for brittle fracture. The application of a TMD to structures with low compressive strength of concrete may not be possible if the weight of the TMD is too much. A heavy TMD is dangerous for these structures because of insufficient axial force capacity of structure. For the preventing brittle fracture, the damping ratio of the TMD must be sufficient to reduce maximum shear forces below the values proposed in design regulations. Using the formulas for frequency and damping ratio related to a preselected mass, this objective can be only achieved by increasing the mass of the TMD. By using a metaheuristic method, the optimum parameters can be searched in a specific limit. In this study, Harmony Search (HS) is employed to find optimum TMD parameters for preventing brittle fracture by reducing shear force in additional to other time and frequency responses. The proposed method is feasible for the retrofit of weak structures with insufficient compressive strength of concrete.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318M-05 (2005), Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, American Concrete Institute.
  2. Amini, F. and Doroudi, R. (2010), "Control of a building complex with magneto-rheological dampers and tuned mass damper", Struct. Eng. Mech., 36 (2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.36.2.181
  3. Bakre, S.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Optimal parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system", Struct. Health Monit., 14, 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.166
  4. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2011), "Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search", Eng. Struct., 33, 2716-2723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024
  5. Bishop, R.E.D. and Welboum, D.B. (1952), "The problem of the dynamic vibration absorber", Eng. (London), 174 and 769.
  6. Bozer, A. and Altay, G. (2013), "Hybrid tracking controller with attached tuned mass damper", Struct. Health Monit., 20(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.497
  7. Chang, C.C. (1999), "Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control", Eng. Struct., 21, 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00213-7
  8. Den Hartog, J.P. (1947), Mechanical vibrations 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
  9. Desu, N.B., Deb, S.K. and Dutta, A. (2006), "Coupled tuned mass dampers for control of coupled vibrations in asymmetric buildings", Struct. Health Monit., 13, 897-916. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.64
  10. Falcon, K.C, Stone, B.J., Simcock, W.D. and Andrew, C. (1967), "Optimization of vibration absorbers: a graphical method for use on idealized systems with restricted damping", J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 9, 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1967_009_058_02
  11. Frahm, H. (1911), Device for damping of bodies, U.S. Patent No: 989,958.
  12. Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H. and Loganathan, G.V. (2001), "A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search", Simulation, 76, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201
  13. Hadi, M.N.S. and Arfiadi, Y. (1998), "Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 124, 1272-1280. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272)
  14. Hoang, N., Fujino, Y. and Warnitchai, P. (2008), "Optimum tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas", Eng. Struct., 30,707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007
  15. Ioi, T. and Ikeda, K. (1978), "On the dynamic vibration damped absorber of the vibration system", Bull. JSME, 21, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.21.64
  16. Lee, C.L., Chen, Y.T., Chung, L.L. and Wang, Y.P. (2006), "Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 28, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.023
  17. Lin, C.C., Wang, J.F. and Ueng, J.M. (2001), "Vibration Control identification of seismically excited m.d.o.f structure-PTMD systems", J. Sound Vib., 240, 87-115. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3188
  18. Leung, A.Y.T., Zhang, H., Cheng, C.C. and Lee, Y.Y. (2008), "Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37, 1223-1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.811
  19. Leung, A.Y.T. and Zhang, H. (2009), "Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 31, 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017
  20. Marano, G.C., Greco, R. and Chiaia, B. (2010), "A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design", J. Sound Vib., 329, 4880-4890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.05.015
  21. METU EERC, http://www.eerc.metu.edu.tr/, METU Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  22. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of dynamic vibration absorber", T. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 50, 9-22.
  23. PEER database , http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga, Pacific earthquake engineering resource center NGA database.
  24. Pozos-Estrada, A., Hong, H.P. and Galsworthy J.K. (2011), " Reliability of structures with tuned mass dampers under wind-induced motion: a serviceability consideration", Wind Struct., 14(2), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.2.113
  25. Rana, R. (1995), A parametric study of tuned mass dampers and their generalizations, M.S. thesis State University of New York, Buffalo.
  26. Rana, R. and Soong, T.T. (1998), "Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 20, 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3
  27. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A.W. and Chung, R.M. (1997), "A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 26,617-635. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  28. Singh, M.P., Singh, S. and Moreschi, L.M. (2002), "Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31,749-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.119
  29. Snowdon, J.C. (1959), "Steady-state behavior of the dynamic absorber", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31, 1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907832
  30. Steinbuch, R. (2011), "Bionic optimization of the earthquake resistance of high buildings by tuned mass dampers", J. Bionic Eng., 8, 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60036-X
  31. Tributsch, A. and Adam, C. (2012), "Evaluation and analytical approximation of Tuned Mass Damper performance in an earthquake environment", Smart Struct. Syst., 10(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.2.155
  32. Turkish Earthquake Code for Buildings (2007), Specification for buildings to be built in earthquake areas, Ministry of Public Works and Resettlement, Ankara, Turkey.
  33. Turkish Standards 500 (2001), Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures, Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  34. Warburton, G.B. (1982), "Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 10, 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  35. Warburton, G.B. and Ayorinde, E.O. (1980), "Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 8,197-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080302

Cited by

  1. Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1071
  2. Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.4.547
  3. Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-017-0386-7
  4. Effect of feedback on PID controlled active structures under earthquake excitations vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.2.217
  5. Seismic control of buildings with active tuned mass damper through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller including soil–structure interaction 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0016-5
  6. Multi-objective optimization of TMD for frame structure based on response surface methodology and weighted desirability function 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0387-2
  7. Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures vol.21, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0829-2
  8. Tuned mass damper system of high-rise intake towers optimized by improved harmony search algorithm vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.011
  9. Multi-objective optimal design of tuned mass dampers vol.24, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2008
  10. Design of double dynamic vibration absorbers for reduction of two DOF vibration system vol.57, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.1.161
  11. Tuning of mass dampers for preventing brittle fracture by employing teaching learning based optimization vol.16, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201610343
  12. Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019
  13. Performance of TMDs on nonlinear structures subjected to near-fault earthquakes vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.4.725
  14. Seismic energy dissipation-based optimum design of tuned mass dampers pp.1615-1488, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2033-0
  15. Optimum design of multiple positioned tuned mass dampers for structures constrained with axial force capacity pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1593
  16. Self-control of high rise building L-shape in plan considering soil structure interaction vol.6, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2017.6.3.229
  17. Effect of soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures vol.66, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217
  18. Tuned Mass Dampers for Response Reduction of a Reinforced Concrete Chimney Under Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions vol.6, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00092
  19. Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Control of Seismic Structures vol.19, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.37394/23205.2020.19.17