대한안전경영과학회지 (Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science)

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.133-141
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-6783(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1484(eISSN)
대한안전경영과학회 (Korea Safety Management & Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

추상화계층에 기반한 작업영역분석의 모델링 개념 및 적용 원칙

Work Domain Analysis Based on Abstraction Hierarchy: Modelling Concept and Principles for Its Application

  • 함동한 (전남대학교 산업공학과)
  • Ham, Dong-Han (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.18
  • 심사 : 2013.09.05
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As a work analysis technique, Work Domain Analysis (WDA) aims to identify the design knowledge structure of a work domain that human operators interact with through human-system interfaces. Abstraction hierarchy (AH) is a multi-level, hierarchical knowledge representation framework for modeling the functional structure of any kinds of systems. Thus, WDA based on AH aims to identify the functional knowledge structure of a work domain. AH has been used in a range of work domains and problems to model their functional knowledge structure and has proven its generality and usefulness. However, many of researchers and system designers have reported that it is never easy to understand the concepts underlying AH and use it effectively for WDA. This would be because WDA is a form of work analysis that is different from other types of work analysis techniques such as task analysis and AH has several unique characteristics that are differentiated from other types of function analysis techniques used in systems engineering. With this issue in mind, this paper introduces the concepts of WDA based on AH and offers a comprehensive list of references. Next, this paper proposes a set of principles for effectively applying AH for work domain analysis, which are developed based on the author's experiences, consultation with experts, and literature reviews.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Achonu, J and G.A. Jamieson. (2003). "Work Domain Analysis of a Financial System: An Abstraction Hierarchy for Portfolio Management.", Proceedings of the 22nd European Annu al Conference on Human Decision Making and Control.
  2. Ahlstrom, Ulf. (2005). "Work Domain Analysis for Air Traffic Controller Weather Displays.", Journal of Safety Research, 36(2): 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.001
  3. Bisantz, Ann M and Kim J. Vicente. (1994). " Making the Abstraction Hierarchy Concrete.", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1): 83-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1005
  4. Burns, Catherine M and Kim J. Vicente. (1995). "A Framework for Describing and Under standing Interdisciplinary Interactions in Design.", Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.
  5. Burns, Catherine M, Johnson Kuo, and Sylvia Ng. (2003). "Ecological Interface Design: a New Approach for Visualizing Network Management.", Computer Networks, 43(3): 369 -388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(03)00287-1
  6. Burns, Catherine M, Ann M. Bisantz, and E milie M. Roth. (2004). "Lessons from a C omparison of Work Domain Models: Repre sentational Choices and Their Implications.", Human Factors, 46(4): 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.711.56810
  7. Cowan, F. Scott, Janet K. Allen, and Farrokh Mistree. (2006). "Functional Modelling in Eng ineering Design: a Perspectival Approach Featuring Living Systems Theory.", Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(3): 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.733
  8. Diaper, Dan and Neville Stanton. (Eds.). 2004. The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  9. Hajdukiewicz, John R, Kim J. Vicente, D.J. Do yle, Paul Milgram, and Catherine M. Burns. (2001). "Modeling a Medical Envrionment: an Ontology for Integrated Medical Informatics Design.", International Journal of Medical Infor matics, 62(1): 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00128-9
  10. Hajdukiewicz, Jonh R and Kim J Vicente. (2004). "A Theoretical Note on the Relationship between Work Domain Analysis and Task Analysis.", Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(6): 527-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/146392204123313003427
  11. Ham, Dong-Han and Wan Chul Yoon. (2001). "The Effects of Presenting Functionally A bstracted Information in Fault Diagnosis Tasks.", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73(2): 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00053-9
  12. Ham, Dong-Han and Wan Chul Yoon. (2001). "Design of Information Content and Layout for Process Control Based on Goal-Means Domain Analysis.", Cognition, Technology, and Work, 3(4): 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-001-8003-z
  13. Ham, Dong-Han, Jeongyun Heo, Peter Fos sick, William Wong, Sanghyun Park, Chiwon Song, and Mike Bradley. (2006). "Conceptual Framework and Models for Identifying and Organizing Usability Impact Factors of Mobile Phones.", Proceedings of OZCHI 2006.
  14. Higgins, P.G. (1999). Job Shop Scheduling: Hybrid Intelligent Human-Computer Paradigm. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The Unive rsity of Melbourne.
  15. Jansson, Anders, Eva Olsson, and Mikael Erl andsson. (2006). "Bridging the Gap between Analysis and Design: Improving Existing Driver Interfaces with Tools from the Framework of Cognitive Work Analysis.", Cognition, Technology and Work, 8(1): 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0018-4
  16. Kossiakoff, Alexander and William N. Sweet. (2003). Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice, Wiley.
  17. Kwon, Gyuhyun, Dong-Han Ham, and Wan C hul Yoon. 2007. Evaluation of Software Us ability Using Scenarios Organized by Abs traction Structure. Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics.
  18. Leveson, Nacy. 2000. Intent Specifications: A n Approach to Building Human-Centred Specifications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 26(1): 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.825764
  19. Lind, Morten. (2003). "Making Sense of the Abstraction Hierarchy in the Power Plant Domain.", Cognition, Technology and Work, 5(2): 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0109-4
  20. Lintern, Gavan. (2006). "A Functional Works pace ofr Military Analysis of Insurgent Operations.", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(5): 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.005
  21. Mazaeva, N and A.M. Bisantz. (2007). "On the Representation of Automation Using a Work Domain Analysis.", Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics, 8(6): 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220600647816
  22. Miller, Anne. (2004). "A Work Domain Anal ysis Framework for Modelling Intensive Care Unit Patients.", Cognition, Technology and Work, 6(4): 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0151-5
  23. Naikar, Neelam and Penelope M. Sanderson. (1999). "Work Domain Analysis for Training System Definition and Acquisition.", The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(3): 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0903_5
  24. Naikar, Neelam and Penelope M. Sanderson. (2001). "Evaluating Design Proposals for Complex Systems with Work Domain Analysis.", Human Factors, 43(4): 529-542. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775870322
  25. Naikar, Neelam, B. Pearce, D. Drumm and Penelope M. Sanderson. (2003). "Designing Teams for First-of-a-Kind Complex Systems Using the Initial Phases of Cognitive Work Analysis: A Case Study.", Human Factors, 42(2): 202-217.
  26. Naikar, Neelam. (2013). Work Domain Anal ysis: Concepts, Guidelines, and Cases, CRC Press.
  27. Rasmussen, Jens. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, North-Holland.
  28. Rasmussen, Jens, Annelise Pejtersen, and L. P. Goodstein. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering, John & Wiley Sons.
  29. Skyttner, Lars. (2005). General Systems Theory, World Scientific.
  30. Vicente, Kim J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  31. Vicente, Kim. J. (1999). "Wanted: Psychologi cally Relevant, Device- and Event-Independent Work Analysis Techniques.", Interacting with Computers, 11(3): 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00067-8
  32. Vicente, Kim and Jens Rasmussen. (1992). "Ecological Interface Design: Theoretical Foundations.", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(4): 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.156574
  33. Wright, H, C. Mathers, J.P.R.B. Walton. (2013). "Using Visualization for Visualization: An Ecological Interface Design Approach to I nputting Data.", Computer & Graphics, 37(3): 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.01.013
  34. Xu, Wei, Marvin J. Dainoff, and Leonard S. Mark. (1999). "Facilitate Complex Search Ta sks in Hypertext by Externalizing Functional Properties of a Work Domain.", International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (3): 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1103_2