대한본초학회지 (The Korea Journal of Herbology)

  • 제28권5호
  • /
  • Pages.103-111
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-1765(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7199(eISSN)
대한본초학회 (The Korea Association of Herbology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동북아 5개국 공정서의 식물성 한약재 기원종 비교 : 동명이속종(同名異屬種)을 중심으로

A Comparative Study about the Origins of Crude Drugs in the Northeast Asian Pharmacopoeias : Centered on Same Name of Materials but Different Genus

  • 최고야 (한국한의학연구원 한약자원그룹) ;
  • 강영민 (한국한의학연구원 한약자원그룹) ;
  • 문병철 (한국한의학연구원 한약자원그룹) ;
  • 김호경 (한국한의학연구원 한약자원그룹)
  • Choi, Goya (Herbal Medicine Resources Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Youngmin (Herbal Medicine Resources Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Byeongcheol (Herbal Medicine Resources Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hokyoung (Herbal Medicine Resources Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2013.08.15
  • 심사 : 2013.09.06
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives : Herbal medicines were used a lot in the Northeast Asia, traditionally. However, the pharmacopoeia standards in South Korea, China, Japan, Taiwan, and North Korea including many other Asia are different and cause confusion. If the origins are not belonging to same genus, it should be careful to distinguish. In this study, herbal medicines in the pharmacopoeia were analyzed for different genus of origins in order to identify the disruptive items for each country. Methods : The scientific names of herbal medicines (plant based) was analyzed origins from Pharmacopoeias of Republic of Korea, People's Republic of China, Japan, Taiwan, and Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The origins specified differently were examined. Especially, the items which have different genus were analyzed in detail and confirmed for correct scientific name. Results : The analyzed herbal medicines in Pharmacopoeia were all 753 items. 320 items were in only one country's Pharmacopoeia. 237 items were in more than two countries' Pharmacopoeia, but their origins were same on each other. The items which have different genus were 35 items. Conclusions : In general, species belonging to the same genus have similar ecological, morphological, and pharmacological activity. However, species with different genus may have different medicinal ingredients and pharmacological activity. Thus, the items which have same name but different genus are required to analyze for comparison of pharmacological activity. Also, other species belonging to the different genus should be used for different items.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Food & Drug Administration. The Korean Pharmacopoeia 10th edition. The KFDA Notification No. 2012-129. 2012 Dec 27th.
  2. Korea Food & Drug Administration. The Korean Herbal Pharmacopoeia 4th edition. The KFDA Notification No. 2012-135. 2012 Dec 28th.
  3. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China 2010 edition. Volume I. Beijing : China Medico Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Publishing House. 2010.
  4. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China 2010 edition, supplement I. Beijing : China Medico Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Publishing House. 2012.
  5. The Ministry of Heanlth, Labour and Welfare. The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 16th edition. The Ministry of Heanlth, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 65. 2011 Mar 24th.
  6. The Ministry of Heanlth, Labour and Welfare. The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 16th edition, supplement I. The Ministry of Heanlth, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 519. 2012 Sep 27th.
  7. The Ministry of Heanlth, Labour and Welfare. The Japanese Standards for Non-Pharmacopoeial Crude Drugs 2012. 2012 Oct 30th.
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Traditional Pharmacopoeia of Taiwan. Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 0930000936. 2005 Mar 9th.
  9. Democratic People's Republic of Korea Pharmacopoeia Commission. The Pharmacopoeia of Democratic People's Republic of Korea 7th edition. Pyeongyang : Medical Science Publishing House. 2011.
  10. Park SH, Youm JR, Chang IM. Systematic Botanical Survey of Traditional Herbal Medicines Listed in the Official Drug Compendia(Pharmacopeia and Natural Drug Standards) of Korea, China and Japan. Kor J Pharmacogn. 1991 ; 22(2) : 112-23.
  11. Seo BI. A Study on Origin and Name of Herbs in South and North Korea(IV). J Jeahan Ori Med Academy. 2000 ; 5(1) : 1-21.
  12. Seo BI. A Study on Origins of Herbal Oriental Medicines in Several Nations Pharmacopoeias and Standard Collections for Editing of Korea Herbs Pharmacopoeia(VIII). J East West Med. 2002 ; 27(4) : 47-62.
  13. Choi MS, Kang CS, Kim HS, Kim EJ, Hong CH, Ko YS, Kim SH, Jang SJ. Comparative Study of the Korean Pharmacopoeia with North Korean Pharmacopoeia. J Kor Pharm Sci. 2004 ; 34(5) : 427-33. https://doi.org/10.4333/KPS.2004.34.5.427
  14. Kim IR. A Study on the Medicinal Using Part and Description of Linderae Radix in the Korea Pharmacopoeia Ninth Edition. Kor J Herbology. 2008 ; 23(3) : 135-40.
  15. Kim IR. A Study on the Herbal Name and Four Qi(四性) of Genus Curcuma in the Korea Pharmacopoeia Ninth Edition. Kor J Herbology. 2009 ; 24(3) : 21-8.
  16. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Missouri Botanical Garden. The Plant List, Version 1. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2013, from http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/search?q=.
  17. Missouri Botanical Garden & Harvard University Herbaria. eFloras. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2013, from http://efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2.
  18. Plant Names Project. The International Plant Names Index Author Query. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2013, from http://www.ipni.org/ipni/authorsearchpage.do.
  19. International Association for Plant Taxonomy. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Koenigstein : Koeltz Scientific Books. 2012.
  20. Doh EJ, Lee GS. Reconsideration about Nomenclature of Herbs Listed in the Korean Pharmacopoeia. Kor J Herbology. 2013 ; 28(3) : 61-8. https://doi.org/10.6116/kjh.2013.28.3.61
  21. Chang CS. Herbacious Plants Nomenclature Service. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2013, from http://plaza.snu.ac.kr/-quercus1/Herblist.htm.
  22. Choi GY, Choo BK, Moon BC, Lee HW, Lee AY, Kim HK. Study on the Origin of the Haedae by Literature Review on the Classics of Oriental Medicine. Kor J Ori Med. 2007 ; 13(3) : 12.
  23. Yonekura K, Kajita T. YList, BG Plants Japanes name - Scientific name database. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2013, from http://bean.bio.chiba-u.jp/bgplants.
  24. Kang HS, Shin MK, Song HJ. A Comparative Study about the Composition of Essential Oils and Effects on the Neurodegenerative Disorders of Herba Agastachis and Herba Pogostemonis. Kor J Herbology. 1996 ; 11(2) : 183-205.
  25. Kim IR. Bibliographical Study on the Source of Gwackhyang. Kor J Herbology. 2006 ; 21(4) : 43-9.
  26. Zhong N, Zhao G, Dai S, Chen R. Zhong yao da ci dian. 2nd ed. Shanghai : Shanghai ke xue ji shu chu ban she. 2006.
  27. Lee GS, Doh EJ, Jeong SI, Kim HJ, Lee JC, Oh SE, Ju YS, Cho SI. Identification Keys of Jeonho(Qianhu) and Asam(Eshen). Kor J Herbology. 2011 ; 26(3) : 57-63.