품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.395-404
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고품질 무기체계 획득을 위한 성숙도평가 방안 소개

A Study on Readiness Assessment for The Acquisition of High Quality Weapon System

  • Kim, Hyun Woo (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Woo, Soon (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Jang, Bong Ki (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.26
  • 심사 : 2013.08.25
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Technology readiness assessment(TRA) used as a standard readiness assessment tool in the acquisition program of weapon system has some limitations in the comprehensive understanding of the complex system. Therefore, this research is intended to suggest a holistic maturity assessment method for the acquisition of high quality weapon system. Methods: Technology readiness level(TRL), manufacturing readiness level(MRL), integration readiness level(IRL) and system readiness level(SRL) developed to assess system maturities in the various aspects are compared and analyzed to draw an improvement avenue for the current readiness assessment method. Results: TRL, MRL, IRL and SRL have large differences in their maturity targets during the acquisition life cycle: technological performance, manufacturing capability, interface between components and total system, respectively. They complement one another's shortcomings Conclusion: To achieve a successful acquisition of high quality weapon system, multi-dimensional readiness assessment is required. Therefore, comprehensive readiness assessment using TRL, MRL, IRL and SRL will contribute to the acquisition of high quality weapon system through the accurate maturity information of overall system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Azizian, N., Sarkani, S., and Mazzuchi, T. 2009. "A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Maturity Assessment Approaches for Improved Decision Support to Achieve Efficient Defense Acquisition." Proceedings for the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science.
  2. Chung, H. Y., Lee, H. Y., and Park, Y. I. 2012. "Reliability Evaluation of Weapon System using Field Data: Focusing on Case of K-series Weapon System." Journal of the Korean Society of Quality Management 40:278-285. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.278
  3. DAPA. 2013. Defense Program Management Regulation.
  4. DAPA. 2013. Manufacturing Readiness Level Instruction.
  5. DAPA. 2013. Technology Readiness Level Instruction.
  6. DoD. 2009. Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA). Deskbook.
  7. DoD. 2012. Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL). Deskbook.
  8. GAO. 2005-2012. "Assessments of Select ed Weapon Programs." Report to Congressional Committees.
  9. GAO. 2010. "DoD Can Achieve Better Out comes by Standardizing the Way Manufacturing Risks Are Managed." Report to Congressional Requesters.
  10. Mosher, D. E. 2000. "Understanding the Extraordinary Cost Growth of Missile Defense." Arms Control Today 9-15.
  11. Sauser, B., and Forbes, E. 2009. "Defining an Integration Readiness Level for Defense Acquisition." International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering.
  12. Sauser, B., Marquez, R., Magnaye, R., and Tan, W. 2008. "A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition." International Journal of Defense Acquisition Management 1:39-58.
  13. Tetlay, A., and John, P. 2009. "Determing the Lines of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness in the System Development Lifecycle." 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research.
  14. Yoon, K. S., and Lee, J. C. 2012. "A Case Study on the Reliability Assessment of Stockpile Ammunition." Journal of the Korean Society of Quality Management 40:259-269. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.259