DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding the Film As A Public Space: The Public Sphere and the Korean Film Industry in the 1980s

  • Received : 2013.03.18
  • Accepted : 2013.08.19
  • Published : 2013.09.28

Abstract

The Korean films in the 1980s played an important role in impeding the interaction between the media and the audience. In terms of two mechanisms of money and power, the Korean films lost the function of publicity and were forced to disregard positive aspects of culture as a way of understanding society. As a mass medium, the film did not give people the space for critical thought and discussion on social reality. This study tries to discuss how Korean movies in the 1980s functioned as a bulwark of critical debate provided by the interaction between cultural texts and audiences through the notion of the public sphere. For Habermas, the public sphere provides a basis for critical analysis in order to reveal the relationship between media and economic and administrative power in a modern society.

Keywords

References

  1. Habermas J., The Public Sphere, In Chandra Mukerji and Michael Schudson (ed.), Rethinking Popular Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991, p. 398.
  2. Hohendahl P. U., Critical Theory, public sphere and culture: Jurgen Habermas and his critics, New German Critique, 16, 1979, p. 89.
  3. Habermas J., The Public Sphere, In Chandra Mukerji and Michael Schudson (ed.), Rethinking Popular Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991, p. 398.
  4. Habermas J., Further Reflections on the Public Sphere, in C. Calhoun(ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, p. 19.
  5. Habermas J., Further Reflections on the Public Sphere, in C. Calhoun(ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, p.23.
  6. Habermas J., Further Reflections on the Public Sphere, in C. Calhoun(ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, p. 27.
  7. Habermas J., The Public Sphere, In Chandra Mukerji and Michael Schudson (ed.), Rethinking Popular Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991, p. 402.
  8. Habermas J., The Public Sphere, In Chandra Mukerji and Michael Schudson (ed.), Rethinking Popular Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991, p. 398.
  9. Holub R. C., Jurgen Habermas: Crisis in the Public Sphere, London: Routledge, 1991, p. 6.
  10. Burt R., The Administration of Aesthetics, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1994.
  11. Marx K., Capital I, New York: Vintage Books, 1976, pp. 35-81.
  12. Burt R., The Administration of Aesthetics, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1994, p. 11.
  13. Wasko J., "The Political Economy of the American Film Industry," Media, Culture and Society, vol. 3(2), 1981, p. 135. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344378100300204
  14. Korean Cinema Yearbook, 1990, pp. 349-358.
  15. Lee M., A Study of Structure of Distribution and a Reformation Plan, in The Thesis Collection of Korean Academy of Fine Arts, Seoul: The Motion Picture Promotion Corporation, 1984, p. 241.
  16. Nam J., A Study on the industrial aspects of the Korean film in the 1980s, A Master's Thesis: Chung-Ang University, 1991, p. 47.
  17. Klinger B., Digressions at the Cinema: Commodification and Reception in Mass Culture, in James Naremore and Patrick Brantlinger (ed), Modernity and Mass Culture, Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1991, p. 125.
  18. John Lent explained some of this art film genre, See Lent J. A., "South Korea," in Lent, The Asian Film Industry, Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press, 1990, p. 141.
  19. Article 19: The International Center on Censorship, Information Freedom and Censorship. Chicago: American Library Association, 1991, p. 188.
  20. Goldstein R. J., Political Censorship of the Arts and the Press in Nineteenth-Century Europe. London: Macmillan, 1989, p. 13.
  21. Lent J. A., "South Korea," in Lent, The Asian Film Industry. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press, 1990.
  22. Hangyeorye Daily, October 1, 1989.
  23. Screen, p.256, August 1989.