Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical evaluation of ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft material: case series study

  • Lee, Ji-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yi, Yang-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Joon-Ho (The Hill School)
  • Received : 2013.06.21
  • Accepted : 2013.08.08
  • Published : 2013.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Interest in bone graft material has increased with regard to restoration in cases of bone defect around the implant. Autogenous tooth bone graft material was developed and commercialized in 2008. In this study, we evaluated the results of vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation with autogenous tooth bone graft material. Materials and Methods: This study targeted patients who had vertical or horizontal ridge augmentation using AutoBT from March 2009 to April 2010. We evaluated the age and gender of the subject patients, implant stability, adjunctive surgery, additional bone graft material and barrier membrane, post-operative complication, implant survival rate, and crestal bone loss. Results: We performed vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using powder- or block-type autogenous tooth bone graft material, and implant placement was performed on nine patients (male: 7, female: 2). The average age of patients was $49.88{\pm}12.98$ years, and the post-operative follow-up period was $35{\pm}5.31$ months. Post-operative complications included wound dehiscence (one case), hematoma (one case), and implant osseointegration failure (one case; survival rate: 96%); however, there were no complications related to bone graft material, such as infection. Average marginal bone loss after one-year loading was $0.12{\pm}0.19$ mm. Therefore, excellent clinical results can be said to have been obtained. Conclusion: Excellent clinical results can be said to have been obtained with vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft material.

Keywords

References

  1. Simion M, Trisi P, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:496-511.
  2. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S, Polizzi G. Vertical ridge augmentation: what is the limit? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:220-9.
  3. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:35-45. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001035.x
  4. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, Rimondini L. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:82-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00999.x
  5. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim SG, Um IW. Development of bone graft material using autogenous teeth. Dent Success 2009;29:586-93.
  6. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  7. Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:19-25.
  8. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 404-14.
  9. Li J, Xuan F, Choi BH, Jeong SM. Minimally invasive ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks in an atrophied posterior mandible: a clinical and histological study. Implant Dent 2013;22:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182805bec
  10. Kim JY, Kim KW, Um IW, Kim YK, Lee JK. Bone healing capacity of demineralized dentin matrix materials in a mini-pig cranium defect. J Korean Dent Sci 2012;5:21-8. https://doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2012.5.1.21
  11. Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK. Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37:375-9. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.5.375
  12. Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jin SC, Son JS, Kim SY, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:7442-5. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4857
  13. Kim YK, Kim JH, Hwang JY, Um IW, Jeong D, Yun PY. Restoration of calvarial defect using a variety of xenogenous tooth bone graft material: animal study. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;34:299-310.
  14. Murata M, Akazawa T, Hino J, Tazaki J, Ito K, Arisue M. Biochemical and histo-morphometrical analyses of bone and cartilage induced by human decalcified dentin matrix and BMP-2. Oral Biol Res 2011;35:9-14. https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.35.1.201103.9
  15. Murata M, Sato D, Hino J, Akazawa T, Tazaki J, Ito K, Arisue M. Acid-insoluble human dentin as carrier material for recombinant human BMP-2. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100:571-7.
  16. Murata M, Akazawa T, Mitsugi M, Um IW, Kim KW, Kim YK. Human dentin as novel biomaterial for bone regeneration. In: Pignatello R, ed. Biomaterials-physics and chemistry. 1st ed. New York: InTech; 2011:127-40.
  17. MA DH, Kim SG, Oh JS, Lee SK, Jeoung ME, Kim JS, et al. Guided bone regeneration at bony defect using familial tooth graft material: case report. Oral Biol Res 2012;36:69-73. https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.36.1.201203.69
  18. Kim YK, Kim SG, Kim KW, Um IW. Extraction socket preservation and reconstruction using autogenous tooth bone graft: case report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:264-9.
  19. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim KW, Kim SG, Um IW. Guide bone regeneration using autogenous teeth: case reports. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37:142-7. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.2.142
  20. Kim YK, Kim SG, Um IW. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft materials: case Report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:166-70.
  21. Lee JH, Kim SG, Moon SY, Oh JS, Kim YK. Clinical effectiveness of bone grafting material using autogenous tooth: preliminary report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:144-8.
  22. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Kim YK, Oh JS, Jeong MA, Park JJ. Clinical study of graft materials using autogenous teeth in maxillary sinus augmentation. Implant Dent 2011;20:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182386d74
  23. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Oh JS, Lim SC. Maxillary sinus augmentation using autogenous teeth: preliminary report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;33:256-63.
  24. Lee JY, Kim YK. Retrospective cohort study of autogenous tooth bone graft. Oral Biol Res 2012;36:39-43. https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.36.1.201203.39
  25. Kim YK. Bone graft material using teeth. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;38:134-8. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.3.134

Cited by

  1. Bone Regeneration Using Dentin Matrix Depends on the Degree of Demineralization and Particle Size vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147235
  2. Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review vol.44, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.028
  3. Osteogenic Potential of Demineralized Dentin Matrix as Bone Graft Material vol.26, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.26.223
  4. Evaluation of the Healing Potential of Demineralized Dentin Matrix Fixed with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Bone Grafts vol.10, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091049
  5. Clinical application of autogenous partially demineralized dentin matrix prepared immediately after extraction for alveolar bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a pilot study vol.47, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1279
  6. Histological Evaluation of the Healing Process of Various Bone Graft Materials after Engraftment into the Human Body vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050714
  7. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the interface between an implanted demineralised dentin matrix and the surrounding newly formed bone vol.8, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21291-3
  8. Numerical investigations of bone remodelling around the mouse mandibular molar primordia vol.222, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2018.12.009
  9. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autologous Demineralized Tooth Matrix and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin Alone : A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial vol.28, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000918
  10. Chemical and thermal deproteinization of human demineralized tooth matrix: Physicochemical characterization and osteoblast cell biocompatibility vol.34, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328219866039
  11. Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review vol.23, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02869-1
  12. Immediate implant placement in anterior teeth with grafting material of autogenous tooth bone vs xenogenic bone vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0970-7
  13. Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? vol.14, pp.20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123