DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using a Body Scanner in Assessing Perceptions of Attractiveness: Cross-Regional Study

  • Aghekyan, Marine (Dept. of Family & Consumer Sciences, California State University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Eun (Dept. of Family & Consumer Sciences, California State University) ;
  • Lichty, Margaret (Dept. of Family & Consumer Sciences, California State University)
  • Received : 2013.06.12
  • Accepted : 2013.08.09
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

Previous research reported that body size measured as Body Mass Index (BMI) and body shape measured as waist-hip-ratio (WHR) are two essential factors that form the perceptions of body attractiveness. However, the debate on the importance of BMI versus WHR is ongoing. In addition, scholarly articles, that focus on the role of geographic and cultural variability on perceptions of attractiveness, report inconsistent results. Some suggested that according to globalization and the rise of mass media, geographic variability of perceptions of attractiveness have been altered, while others believed that it remains. This study cross-regionally investigates the role of body size and body shape on the perceptions of female attractiveness. Samples were composed of 107 female college students in Alabama and 107 female college students in California. Participants viewed 27 three-dimensional body scan images of women in three body shapes (pear, hourglass, and rectangle) and three body sizes (underweight, normal weight, and overweight) and rated their perceptions of attractiveness. Images were shown to students in a random order with an overhead projector and Microsoft Office PowerPoint software. A three-way mixed-ANOVA was conducted to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that some regional differences exist between the two sample groups. However, regardless of the regional difference, hourglass shapes were perceived to be the most attractive shape and underweight sizes were perceived to be the most attractive size for both samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghekyan, M., Ulrich, P., & Connell, L. J. (2012). Using body scans in assessing perceptions of body attractiveness and size: cross-cultural study. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 5(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2011.636073
  2. Berg, F. M. (2000). Women afraid to eat: Breaking free in today's weight-obsessed world. Hettinger, SA: Health Weight Network.
  3. Brooks, R., Shelly, J. P., Fan, J., Zhai, L., & Chau, D. K. P. (2010). Much more than a ratio: Multivariate selection on female bodies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23 (10), 2238-2248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02088.x
  4. Bush, H., Williams, R., Lean, M., & Anderson, A. (2001). Body image and weight consciousness among South Asian, Italian and general population women in Britain. Appetite, 37(3), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0424
  5. Connell, L. J., Ulrich, P. V., Brannon, E. L., Alexander, M., & Presley, A. B. (2006). Body shape assessment scale: Instrument development for analyzing female figures. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(2), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0602400203
  6. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., & Baoguo, L. I. (2010a). Female waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index and sexual attractiveness in China. Current Zoology, 56(2), 1-17.
  7. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand-US comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 798-806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y
  8. Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010c). Watching the hourglass eye tracking reveals men's appreciation of the female form. Human Nature-an Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 21(4), 355-370.
  9. Fallon, A. (1990) Culture in the mirrors: Sociocultural determinants of body image. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 81-107). New York: Guilford Press.
  10. Forestell, C. A., Humphrey T. M., & Stewart, S. H. (2004). Involvement of body weight and shape factors in rating of attractiveness by women: A replication and extension of Tassinary and Hansen (1998). Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00085-0
  11. Furnham, A., & Alibhai, N. (1983). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of female body shapes. Psychological Medicine, 13(4), 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700051540
  12. Furnham, A., & Baguma, P. (1994). Cross-cultural differences in the evaluation of male and female body shapes. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199401)15:1<81::AID-EAT2260150110>3.0.CO;2-D
  13. Furnham, A., & Nordling, R. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in preferences for specific male and female body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00076-2
  14. Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape. A replication and extension. Personality Individual Differences, 22(4), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00241-3
  15. Grogan, S., Gill, S., Brownbridge, K., Kilgariff, S., & Whalley, A. (2013). Dress fit and body image: A thematic analysis of women's accounts during and after trying on dresses. Body Image, 10(3), 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.03.003
  16. Grundl, M., Eisenmann-Klein, M., & Prantl, L. (2009). Quantifying female bodily attractiveness by a statistical analysis of body measurements. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 123(3), 1064-1071. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f7a6
  17. Gupta, M., Chaturvedi, S., Chandarana, P., & Johnson, A. (2001). Weight-related body image concerns among 18-24-year-old women in Canada and India: An empirical comparative study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50(4), 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00221-X
  18. Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00093-L
  19. Hogg, M. A., & Graham, M. V. (1995). Social physiology: An introduction. London: Prentice Hall, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  20. Jung, J., & Lennon, J. S. (2003). Body image, appearance self-schema, and media images. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 32(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X03255900
  21. Jung, J., & Peterson, M. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and patterns of media use among preadolescent children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X07303486
  22. Koscinski, K. (2013). Attractiveness of womens body: Body mass index, waisthip ratio, and their relative importance. Behavioral Ecology, 24(4), 914-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art016
  23. Mazur, A. (1986). U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. Journal of Sex Research, 22(3), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498609551309
  24. Price, M. E., Pound, N., Dunn, J., Hopkins, S., & Kang, J. (2013). Body shape preferences: Associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality. Plos One, 8(1), e52532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052532
  25. Rilling, J. K., Kaufman, T. L., Smith, E. O., Patel, R., & Worthman, C. M. (2009). Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.007
  26. Rudd, N. A., & Lennon, S. J. (2000). Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0001800304
  27. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Physiology, 65(2), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
  28. Singh, D. (1994a). Waist-to-hip ratio and judgment of attractiveness and healthiness of female figures by male and female physicians. International Journal of Obesity, 18 (11), 731-737.
  29. Singh, D. (1994b). Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 123-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90116-3
  30. Singh, D. (2006). Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 33, 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2006.05.007
  31. Singh, D., & Singh, D. (2011). Shape and significance of feminine beauty: An evolutionary perspective. Sex Roles, 64(9-10), 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9938-z
  32. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovee, M. J. (2007a). Color 3D bodies and judgments of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.007
  33. Smith, K. L., Tovee, M. J., Hancock, P. J. B., Bateson, M., Cox, M. A. A., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2007b). An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: Evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination. Visual Cognition, 15 (8), 927-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280601029515
  34. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2005). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.08.001
  35. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgments of women's physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia. Body Image, 4(4), 391-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.07.002
  36. Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., ... Zivcic-Becirevic, I. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the international body project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359702
  37. Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Physiological Science, 9(2), 150-155.
  38. Tiggemann, M., & Andrew, R. (2012). Clothing choices, weight, and trait self-objectification. Body Image, 9(3), 409-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.02.003
  39. Tovee, M. J., Benson, P. J., Emery, J. L., Mason, S. M., & Cohen-Tovee, E. M. (2003). Measurement of body size and shape perception in eating-disordered and control observers using body-shape software. British Journal of Physiology, 94(4), 501-516.
  40. Tovee, M. J., Hancock, P. J. B., Mahmoodi, S., Singleton, B. R., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2002). Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 269(1506), 2205-2213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2133
  41. Tovee, M. J., Maisey, S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266(1415), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0624
  42. Tovee, M. J, Reinhardt, S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1998). Optimal BMI and maximal sexual attractiveness. The Lancet, 352(9127), 548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79257-6
  43. United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). State & County Quick-Facts. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved July 25, 2013 from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html
  44. Wilson, J. M. B., Tripp, D. A., & Boland, F. J. (2005). The relative contributions of subjective and objective measures of body shape and size to body image and disordered eating in women. Body Image, 2(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.001
  45. World Health Organization. (n.d.). BMI Classification. World Health Organization. Retrieved July 25, 2013 from http://apps.who.int/bmi/index. jsp?introPage=intro_3.html