DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating Economic Feasibility of Solar Power Generation Under the RPS System Using the Real Option Pricing Method: Comparison Between Regulated and Non-regulated Power Providers

실물옵션을 활용한 RPS 실시에 따른 태양광 발전의 경제성 평가: 공급의무 발전사와 일반 발전사와의 비교

  • Kim, Eun-Man (Department of Energy Economics and Policy, Korea Polytechnic University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Soo (Department of Photovoltaic Engineering, Far East University)
  • 김은만 (한국산업기술대학교 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 김명수 (극동대학교 태양광공학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.07
  • Accepted : 2013.08.24
  • Published : 2013.09.01

Abstract

This study reviewed how the changes of the government policy on solar power generation projects affected the annual mandatory quotas of the regulated power providers under the RPS (renewable portfolio standard) system and analysed economic feasibility of the investment for meeting their quotas as compared to the case of non-regulated power providers. The analysis results showed that under the discount rate of 7.5%, which was used for the annual national electricity plans for the recent years, both the regulated and non-regulated power providers achieved economic feasibility under both the NPV (net present value) method and the real option pricing method. It was also shown that higher profitability was attained by non-regulated power providers than by their regulated counterparts, which can be attributable to the fact that regulated providers are required to out-source 50% of the total quota. The results of this study are considered to be useful for establishing a meaningful mid term or long term strategy for the future of solar power generation linked to the current RPS system.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. J. Kwon, 2007, Evaluation of Technical Value of National R&D Projects Using Real Options, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Hanyang University, Korea
  2. K. N. Kim, 2012, Use of Real Options Involved in the Value Chains in the Solar Power Industry towards Value Evaluation, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Hong-ik University, Korea
  3. H. J. Park and C. H. Chang, Journal of Research on Resources, Environment, and Economy, 16, 763 (2007).
  4. S. R. Oh, Review of Influences of R&D Investment on Value of a Firm Using the Concepts of Real Options, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Kyeong-hee University, Korea (2011).
  5. D. S. Lee and K. H. Chung, Journal of Research on Resources, Environment, and Economy, 20, 61 (2011).
  6. B. H. Lee, Evaluation of Technical Values of Venture Companies Using Real Options, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Cheonbuk University, Korea (2010).
  7. Y. S. Chun, 2010, Developing a Feed-in-tariff Model Using Real Options and its Application to REC Weights, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Ah-joo University, Korea
  8. Y. J. Chun and H. T. Kim, Research on Energy and Economy, 9, 25 (2010).
  9. E. J. Chung, 2007, Evaluation of Overseas Investment Projects Using Real Options: Application to Korean Global-scale Firms, A Ph. D. Paper, Hanyang University
  10. D. G. Hwang, 2007, Feasibility Evaluation of Harbor Development Projects Using Real Options, A Ph. D. Dissertation, Korea Marine University
  11. Knowledge and Economy Ministry and Renewable Energy Center of Energy Management Corporation, 2012, The Renewable Energy Portfolio System,
  12. Korea Electricity Institute, 2010, A Draft Action Plan for the planned national RPS, A Printed Presentation Material at a Public Hearing for the Creation of RPS Rules