DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Motion Effects of the Ship on Crew Performance

  • Kim, Hongtae (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Ha, Wook Hyun (Instrumentation & Control Engineering Deaprtment, KEPCO E&C) ;
  • Jang, Jun-Hyuk (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Fang, Tae Hyun (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Oh, Seungbin (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.07.01
  • Accepted : 2013.08.01
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to provide a current knowledge of the multiple issues regarding motion effects on crew performance. Background: The motions of the ship may create motion sickness, nausea and vomit. Also, these motions also disturb the balance of crew members, increase the energy expenditure of crew for shipboard work, and result in increased levels of injury and fatigue. However, the motion effects of the ship on crew performance has not been thoroughly investigated. Method: Participants(N=10) were engaged in an experiment in 2 experimental environments(training ship and ship handling simulator) and 2 navigational conditions(day and night). The COP(Center of Pressure) data were recorded as an objective measure of postural balance control and the SSQ(Simulator Sickness Questionnaire) was used as a subjective measure of sickness. Results: The results showed that COP has a no significant difference based on experimental environments, but significant effect on SSQ. Conclusion: During the virtual simulator navigation, subjects showed significant SSQ level changes, which included decreased SSQ data. But, there is no significant difference of COP between training ship and ship handling simulator. Application: The results of this study could be applied to the next generation of ship design to decrease effect of motion at sea and to increase performance of ship crew.

Keywords

References

  1. Bittner, A.C. and Guignard, J.C., Human factors engineering principles for minimizing adverse ship motion effects: Theory and practice, Naval Engineers Journal, 97(4), 205-213, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1985.tb01355.x
  2. Bles, W., De Graaf, B., Keuning, J.A., Ooms, J., De Vries, J. and Wientjes, C.J.E., Experiments on Motion Sickness Aboard the M.V. Zeefakkel, Report IZF-1991-A-34, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands; 1991.
  3. Cohen, H., Blatchly, C.A. and Gombash, I.L., A study of the clinical test of sensory interaction and balance, Phys Ther, 73, 346-354, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/73.6.346
  4. Dobie, T.G., "The Importance of the Human Element in Ship Design", Proceedings of the Ship Structure Symposium, Arlington VA, June 13, 2000.
  5. Jung, C.H. and Lee, Y.S., A study on the ships performance of T.S. Hanbada (II), Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 32(5), 333-339, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2008.32.5.333
  6. Gong, D.S., Studies for ship-motions-effects on personnel's, Journal of Ships and Ocean Engineering, 38, 111-116, 2004.
  7. Griffin, M.J., Sea Sickness, In AGARD (Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development) Lecture Series 175, Motion Sickness: Significance in Aerospace Operations and Prophylaxis, 1991.
  8. Kehoe, J.W., Brower, K.J. and Comstock, E.N., Seakeeping and combat system performance-the operator's assessment, Naval Engineer's Journal, 256-266, 1983.
  9. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S. and Lilienthal, M.G., Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness, The Int'l J. of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203-220, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
  10. Kim, Y.W., Kim, E.N. and Kim, H.T., "Perspectives of Psychophysiology in Virtual Reality", Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Korean Society for Cognitive Psychology and Biology, 59-69, 2002.
  11. Lee, J.S., Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sigma Press, 2001.
  12. McCauley, M.E., Royal, J.W., Wylie, C.D., O'Hanlon, J.F. and Mackie, R.R., Motion Sickness Incidence: Exploratory Studies of Habituation, Pitch and Roll, and the Refinement of a Mathematical Model, Technical Report 1733-2, Human Factors Research Inc., 1976.
  13. Owen, N., Leadbetter, A.G. and Yardley, L., Relationship between postural control and motion sickness in healthy subject, Brain Res., 47(5), 471-474, 1998.
  14. Samson, C.S. and Michael, G.P., Effects of motion at sea on crew performance: a survey, Marine Technology, 39(1), 29-47, 2002.
  15. SNAK, Introduction to Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Dong- Myung Press, 1996.
  16. Wertheim, A.H., Heus, R. and Kistemakers, J.A., Human Energy Expenditure, Task Performance and Sea Sickness during Simulated Ship Movements, Report TNO-TM 1995-C29, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, 1995.
  17. Wertheim, A.H., Bos J.E. and Bles W., Contributions of roll and pitch to sea sickness. Brain Research Bulletin, 47(5), 517-524, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00098-7