The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of different adhesive system applications on push-out bond strengths of glass fiber posts

  • Received : 2013.03.13
  • Accepted : 2013.08.16
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Over the past years, the adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of a self-adhesive resin cement using different adhesive systems to compare the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The post spaces of 56 mandibular premolar roots were prepared and divided into 4 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=7). The fiber posts (Rely X Fiber Post) were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and one of the following adhesive systems: no adhesive, a total-etch adhesive resin (Single Bond), a two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each root was cut horizontally, and 1.5 mm thick six root segments were prepared. Push-out tests were performed after one week or three months (0.5 mm/min). Statistical analysis were performed with three-way ANOVA (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Cervical root segments showed higher bond strength values than middle segments. Adhesive application increased the bond strength. For one week group, the total-etch adhesive resin Single Bond showed higher bond strength than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem applied without adhesive resin at middle region. For 3 months group, the two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength for both regions. Regarding the time considered, Clearfil SE Bond 3 months group showed higher bond strength values than one week group. CONCLUSION. Using the adhesive resins in combination with the self-adhesive resin cement improves the bond strengths. The bond strength values of two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond improved as time passes.

Keywords

References

  1. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:609-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00005-2
  2. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:1156-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.005
  3. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:326-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x
  4. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8.
  5. Bitter K, Kielbassa AM. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 2007;20:353-60.
  6. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence ofvertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:262-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70267-2
  7. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Cury AH, Tay F, Ferrari M. Immediate and 24-hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of fiber posts. J Endod 2006;32:1174-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.005
  8. Zhang L, Huang L, Xiong Y, Fang M, Chen JH, Ferrari M. Effect of post-space treatment on retention of fiber posts in different root regions using two self-etching systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:280-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00536.x
  9. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1
  10. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005;31:608-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000153841.23594.91
  11. Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent 2004;29:60-8.
  12. Teixeira CS, Pasternak-Junior B, Borges AH, Paulino SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84:430-5.
  13. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:752-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002
  14. Ohlmann B, Fickenscher F, Dreyhaupt J, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Schmitter M. The effect of two luting agents, pretreatment of the post, and pretreatment of the canal dentin on the retention of fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Dent 2008;36:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.002
  15. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond strength of light- and self-cured adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent 2005;30:500-6.
  16. Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:368-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.027
  17. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjor IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13:255-60.
  18. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.004
  19. de Munck J, Vargas M, van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  20. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay F, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:353-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x
  21. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-35.
  22. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:161-6.
  23. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:543-51.
  24. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:315-24.
  25. de Munck J, Mine A, Vivan Cardoso M, de Almeida Neves A, van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, van Meerbeek B. Effect of dentin location and long-term water storage on bonding effectiveness of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011;30:7-13. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-085
  26. Shirai K, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, van Meerbeek B. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2005;21:110-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
  27. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Nagakane K, Suzuki K, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2005;84: 1160-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508401213
  28. Miguez PA, Pereira MP, Swift EJ Jr. One-year tensile bond strengths of two self-etching primers to bovine enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:243-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00044.x
  29. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002;18:596-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9
  30. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:307-12.

Cited by

  1. Effect of different adhesive systems and post surface treatments on the push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced post vol.54, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.218
  2. Effect of Anatomical Customization of the Fiber Post on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement vol.2017, pp.1687-8736, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5010712
  3. Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review vol.93, pp.1-2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2016.1184094
  4. Dentin Morphology of Root Canal Surface: A Quantitative Evaluation Based on a Scanning Electronic Microscopy Study vol.2015, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/164065
  5. Post boşluğuna bağlayıcı uygulamalarının kendinden bağlanabilen rezin siman kullanılarak yapıştırılan fiber postların push-out bağlanma dayanımları vol.34, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.277728
  6. Evaluation of the bubble mixture rate and the bond strength of post to dentin according to the technique of applying resin cement vol.12, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2186/ajps.12.264