The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived color shift of ceramics according to the change of illuminating light with spectroradiometer

  • Cha, Hyun-Suk (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Yu, Bin (State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Keun (Institute for Clinical Performance of Biomaterials (ICPB))
  • Received : 2012.02.28
  • Accepted : 2013.05.01
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Perceived color of ceramics changes by the spectral power distribution of ambient light. This study aimed to quantify the amount of shifts in color and color coordinates of clinically simulated seven all-ceramics due to the switch of three ambient light sources using a human vision simulating spectroradiometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. CIE color coordinates, such as $L^*$, $a^*$ and $b^*$, of ceramic specimens were measured under three light sources, which simulate the CIE standard illuminant D65 (daylight), A (incandescent lamp), and F9 (fluorescent lamp). Shifts in color and color coordinate by the switch of lights were determined. Influence of the switched light (D65 to A, or D65 to F9), shade of veneer ceramics (A2 or A3), and brand of ceramics on the shifts was analyzed by a three-way ANOVA. RESULTS. Shifts in color and color coordinates were influenced by three factors (P<.05). Color shifts by the switch to A were in the range of 5.9 to 7.7 ${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ units, and those by the switch to F9 were 7.7 to 10.2; all of which were unacceptable (${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ > 5.5). When switched to A, CIE $a^*$ increased (${\Delta}a^*$: 5.6 to 7.6), however, CIE $b^*$ increased (${\Delta}b^*$: 4.9 to 7.8) when switched to F9. CONCLUSION. Clinically simulated ceramics demonstrated clinically unacceptable color shifts according to the switches in ambient lights based on spectroradiometric readings. Therefore, shade matching and compatibility evaluation should be performed considering ambient lighting conditions and should be done under most relevant lighting condition.

Keywords

References

  1. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  2. Barao VA, Gennari-Filho H, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Pesqueira AA. Factors to achieve aesthetics in all-ceramic restorations. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:2007-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f535d4
  3. Lee YK, Yu B, Lim JI, Lim HN. Perceived color shift of a shade guide according to the change of illuminant. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60006-1
  4. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prothodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2006. p. 774.
  5. Anusavice K. Philips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis; Saunders; 2003. p. 655-719.
  6. Zhang Y, Kim JW. Graded zirconia glass for resistance to veneer fracture. J Dent Res 2010;89:1057-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510375289
  7. Barnes D, Gingell JC, George D, Adachi E, Jefferies S, Sundar VV. Clinical evaluation of an all-ceramic restorative system: a 36-month clinical evaluation. Am J Dent 2010;23: 87-92.
  8. Park JH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96: 402-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.007
  9. Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection. Quintessence Int 2009;40:e69-79.
  10. Lehmann KM, Igiel C, Schmidtmann I, Scheller H. Four color- measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric reference system. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.006
  11. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Da Silva JD, Miller L. Spectrophotometric analysis of tooth color reproduction on anterior all-ceramic crowns: Part 1: analysis and interpretation of tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:42-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00311.x
  12. Johnston WM, Hesse NS, Davis BK, Seghi RR. Analysis of edge-losses in reflectance measurements of pigmented maxillofacial elastomer. J Dent Res 1996;75:752-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750020401
  13. Yap AU, Sim CP, Loh WL, Teo JH. Human-eye versus computerized color matching. Oper Dent 1999;24:358-63.
  14. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color science - Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. 2nd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
  15. Marcus RT. The measurement of color. In: Nassau K, editor. Color for science, art and technology. Amsterdam; Elsevier; 1998. p. 48-9.
  16. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW, Powers JM. Color characteristics of low-chroma and high-translucence dental resin composites by different measuring modes. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:613-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1060
  17. Lee YK, Powers JM. Color difference of four esthetic restorative materials by the illuminant. Am J Dent 2005;18:359-63.
  18. Yu B, Lee YK. Color difference of all-ceramic materials by the change of illuminants. Am J Dent 2009;22:73-8.
  19. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Plasschaert AJ. A new method for matching tooth colors with color standards. J Dent Res 1985;64:837-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640051101
  20. Lee YK, Yoon TH, Lim BS, Kim CW, Powers JM. Effects of colour measuring mode and light source on the colour of shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1099-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00961.x
  21. Kim SH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Metameric effect between dental porcelain and porcelain repairing resin composite. Dent Mater 2007;23:374-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.027
  22. Volpato CA, Monteiro S Jr, de Andrada MC, Fredel MC, Petter CO. Optical influence of the type of illuminant, substrates and thickness of ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.013
  23. Corcodel N, Helling S, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:311-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00730.x
  24. Cha HS, Lee YK. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants. Am J Dent 2009;22:350-6.
  25. Gokce HS, Piskin B, Ceyhan D, Gokce SM, Arisan V. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:139-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60020-0
  26. Carsten DL. Successful shade matching--what does it take? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:175-82.
  27. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) Colorimetry - technical report. CIE Pub. No. 15. 3rd ed. Vienna; Bureau Central de la CIE; 2004.
  28. Lee YK, Yu B, Lee SH, Cho MS, Lee CY, Lim HN. Variation in instrument-based color coordinates of esthetic restorative materials by measurement method-A review. Dent Mater 2010;26:1098-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.010
  29. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X
  30. Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window color measurements, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1133-42. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/7/006
  31. Lee YK, Cha HS, Ahn JS. Layered color of all-ceramic core and veneer ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:279-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.010
  32. Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60155-9
  33. Bayindir F, Bayindir YZ, Gozalo-Diaz DJ, Wee AG. Coverage error of gingival shade guide systems in measuring color of attached anterior gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60290-5
  34. Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01894.x
  35. Ghinea R, Perez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e57-64.
  36. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  37. Davis S. Color perception - philosophical, psychological, artistic, and cognitive perspectives. New York; Oxford University Press; 2000. p.88-90.
  38. O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. One-dimensional color order system for dental shade guides. Dent Mater 1989;5: 371-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90102-4
  39. Ferreira D, Monard LA. Measurement of spectral reflectance and colorimetric properties of Vita shade guides. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1991;46:63-5.
  40. Lee YK, Powers JM. Metameric effect between resin composite and dentin. Dent Mater 2005;2:971-6.
  41. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  42. Paravina RD, Westland S, Kimura M, Powers JM, Imai FH. Color interaction of dental materials: blending effect of layered composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.018
  43. Lee YK, Yu B, Lim HN. Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions of a shade guide as measured by a spectroradiometer. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:173-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60116-3
  44. Kim JG, Yu B, Lee YK. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs. J Prosthodont 2009;18:135-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00393.x