한국자원식물학회지 (Korean Journal of Plant Resources)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.503-510
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1226-3591(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8203(eISSN)
한국자원식물학회 (The Plant Resources Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초기 묘목크기와 단근강도가 이식 후 졸참나무의 지상부 및 뿌리발달에 미치는 영향

Effect of Initial Seedling Size and Root Pruning Intensity on Above-ground and Root Development in Quercus serrata Seedlings after Transplanting

  • 나성준 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 김인식 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 이도형 (영남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이위영 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부)
  • Na, Sung-Joon (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, In-Sik (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Do-Hyung (Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Wi-Young (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2013.03.14
  • 심사 : 2013.08.02
  • 발행 : 2013.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 졸참나무의 건전한 1-1 조림용 묘목을 생산하기 위해 초기 묘고가 다른 묘목에서 적절한 단근의 강도를 구명하기 위해 실시하였다. 이를 위해 1-0 노지묘의 크기를 구분하여 단근(5, 10, 15 cm)을 실시하였다. 1년의 생육기간이 지난 시점에서 묘고를 비롯한 지상부 생장량과 주근 및 측근의 발달 특성을 비교 분석하였다. 지상부의 생장은 초기 묘목 크기와 단근에 의해 다양한 차이가 나타났으며, 측근의 발달은 묘목 크기에 따른 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 초기 묘고가 큰 묘목군에서는 15 cm로 단근된 묘목이 가장 우수한 지상부 생장량을 나타내었으며, 초기 묘고가 작은 묘목군에서는 15 cm와 10 cm로 단근된 묘목이 우수한 생장량을 나타내었다. 묘목 크기에 따른 생장은 초기 묘고가 큰 묘목이 작은 묘목보다 우수한 지상부 생장을 나타내었으며, 주근의 재생산량과 새롭게 발달된 측근의 수도 많았다. 하지만 측근의 길이 및 무게 생장은 작은 묘목이 더 많았다. 결론적으로 본 연구결과를 종합해 보면, 고품질의 묘목을 생산하기 위해서는 묘고가 큰 1-0묘를 생산하는 것이 다양한 장점을 가지며, 초기 묘고가 26 cm 이상의 큰 묘목은 15 cm로 단근하고, 초기 묘고가 24 cm 이하의 묘목은 10 cm로 단근하는 것이 가장 이상적인 단근길이라고 판단된다.

This study was conducted to determine the optimum intensity of root pruning and the initial seedling size of 1-year-old Quercus serrata for producing 2-year-old healthy seedlings. Large( > 26 cm hight) and small size ( < 24 cm hight) seedlings were pruned their root by the length of 5, 10, and 15cm and then transplanted on nursery. Stem height, root-collar diameter(RCD), height to RCD ratio(H/D ratio), shoot dry weight(DW) and root development were measured during first growing season after transplanting. Seedling size and pruning intensity influenced on shoot growth such as height, RCD, H/D ratio and DW after transplanting. In addition, the development of lateral roots such as number, length, DW and diameter were affected by the seedling size. Taproot pruned by 15cm was shown excellent above-ground growth in large seedling group, but pruned by 10 and 15cm showed respectively better shoot growth in small seedling group. Large seedlings increased their above-ground growth, taproot regrowth, and number of lateral roots more than those of the small seedlings. But the length and DW of lateral roots were increased in the small seedlings. In conclusion, in order to produce high quality 2-year-old seedlings, it is important to produce large size of Q. serrata seedlings. Also root pruning length of 1-year-old Q. serrata was reasonable on 15 cm in taller than 26 cm or 10cm in less than the height.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, L., H.N. Rasmussen and P.E. Brander. 2000. Regrowth and dry matter allocation in Quercus robur(L.) seedlings root pruned prior to transplanting. New For. 19:205-214. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006610805249
  2. Bayala, J., M. Dianda, J. Wilson, S.J. Quedraogo and K. Sanon. 2009. Predicting field performance of five irrigated tree species using seedling quality assessment in Burkina Faso West Africa. New Forest 38:309-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9149-4
  3. Bayley, A.D. and J.W. Kietzka. 1997. Stock quality and field performance of Pinus patula seedlings produced under two nursery growing regimes during seven different nursery production periods. New Forest 13:341-356. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006550728250
  4. Bouma, T.J., K.L. Nielson and B. Koutstaal. 2000. Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerized analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218:185-196.
  5. Burdett, A.N., L.J. Herring and C.F. Thompson. 1984. Early growth of planted spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 14:644-651. https://doi.org/10.1139/x84-116
  6. Castle, W.S. 1983. Antitranspirant and root and canopy pruning effects on mechanically transplanted eight-year old 'Murcott' citrus trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:981-985.
  7. Costa, C., L.M. Dwyer, C. Hamal, D.F. Muamba, X.L. Wang, L. Nantais and D.L. Smith. 2001. Root contrast enhancement for measurement with optical scanner-based image analysis. Can. J. Bot. 79:23-29.
  8. Clark, S.L., S.E. Schlarbaum and P.P. Kormanik. 2000. Visual grading and quality of 1-0 northern red oak seedlings. South J. Appl. For. 21:93-97.
  9. Cleary, B.D., R.D. Greaves and P.W. Owston. 1978. Seedlings. In Cleary B.D., R.D. Greaves and R.K. Hermann (eds.), Regenerating Oregon's Forests, Oregon State Univ. Extension Service, Corvallis, OR (USA). pp. 63-68.
  10. Crow, T.R. 1988. Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra)-a review. For. Sci. 34:19-40.
  11. Davis, A.S. and D.F. Jacobs. 2005. Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New Forest 30:295-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7480-y
  12. Dey, D.C. and W.C. Parker. 1997. Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood. New Forest 14:145-156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006577201244
  13. Dierauf, T.A. and J.W. Garner. 1996. Effect of initial root collar diameter on survival and growth of yellow-poplar seedlings over 17 years. Tree Planters' Notes 47:30-33.
  14. Duryea, M.L. 1985. Evaluating seedling quality: importance to reforestation. In Duryea, M.L. (ed.), Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR (USA). pp. 1-6.
  15. Farmer, J.W. and S.R. Pezeshki. 2004. Effects of periodic flooding and root pruning on Quercus nuttallii seedlings. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 12:205-214 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WETL.0000034073.74476.cc
  16. Geisler, D. and D.C. Ferree. 1984. The influence of root pruning on water relations, net photosynthesis and growth of young 'Golden Delicious' apple trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109: 827-831.
  17. Glass, A.D.M. 2002. Nutrient absorption by plant roots: regulation of uptake to match plant demand. In Waisel Y., A. Eshel and U. Kafkafi (eds.), Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (USA). pp. 571-586.
  18. Grossnickle, S.C. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest 30:273-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
  19. Humphries, E.C. 1958. Effect of removal of a part of the root system on the subsequent growth of the root and shoot. Ann. Bot. 22:251-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083609
  20. Jacobs, D.F. and J.R. Seifert. 2004. Re-evaluating the significance of the first-order lateral root grading criterion for hardwood seedlings. In Proc, 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-316, MN (USA). pp. 382-388.
  21. Jacobs, D.F., K.F. Salifu and J.R. Seifert. 2005. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forest 30:235-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-5419-y
  22. Johnson, P.S. 1992. Underplanting northern red oak in Missouri without herbicides. USDA For. Serv. Gen Tech. Rep. NC-152, MN (USA).
  23. Johnson, P.S., S.L. Novinger and W.G. Mares. 1984. Root, shoot, and leaf area growth potentials of northern red oak planting stock. For. Sci. 30:1017-1026.
  24. Kormanik, P.P. 1986. Lateral root morphology as an expression of sweetgum seedling quality. For. Sci. 32:595-604.
  25. Kormanik, P.P., J.R. Ruehle and H.D. Muse. 1988. Frequency distribution of seedlings by first order lateral roots: a phenotypic or genotypic expression. In Proc. 31st Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference University Park, University Park, PA (USA). pp. 181-187.
  26. Larson, M.M. 1975. Pruning northern red oak seedlings: effects on root regeneration and early growth. Can. J. For. Res. 5:381-386. https://doi.org/10.1139/x75-052
  27. Lusk, C.H. and F.I. Piper. 2007. Seedling size influences relationships of shade tolerance with carbohydrate-storage patterns in a temperate rainforest. Funct. Ecol. 21:78-86.
  28. Mattsson, A. 1997. Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New Forest 13:227-252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006590409595
  29. McArtney, S.J. and D.C. Ferree. 1999. Root and cane pruning affect vegetative development, fruiting and dry-matter accumulation of grapevines. Hort. Sci. 34:617-621.
  30. McNabb, K. and C. Vanderschaaf. 2005. Growth of graded 3 years after root and shoot pruning. New Forest 29:313-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-5654-7
  31. Nambiar, E.K.S. and R. Sands. 1993. Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1955-1968. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-247
  32. Ponder, F. Jr. 2000. Survival and growth of planted hardwoods in harvested openings with first-order lateral root differences, root dipping, and tree shelters. North. J. Appl. For. 17:45-50.
  33. Pope, P.E. 1993. A historical perspective of planting and seeding oak. Progress, problems and status. In Loftis D.L. and C.E. McGee (eds.), Proc. Oak Regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, NC (USA). pp. 224-240.
  34. Racey, G.D. 1985. A comparison of plating stock characterization with root area index, volume, and dry weight. For. Chron. 61:64-70. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc61064-2
  35. Richardson, S.D. 1956. On the role of the acorn in root growth of American oak seedlings. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen. 56:1-18.
  36. Rose, R. and D.L Haase. 2005. Root and shoot allometry of bare-root and container Douglas-fir seedlings. New Forest 30:215-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-5420-5
  37. Rose, R., D.L. Haase. F. Kroiher and T. Sabin. 1997. Root volume and growth of ponderosa pine and Douglass-fir seedlings: a summary of eight growing seasons. Western J. Appl. For. 12:69-73.
  38. Rose, R., W.C. Carlson and P. Morgan. 1990. The target seedling concept. In Rose, R., S.J. Cambell and T.D. Landis (eds.), Proc. Combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200, CO (USA). pp. 1-8.
  39. Ruehle J.L. and P.P. Kormanik. 1986. Lateral root morphology: a potential indicator of seedling quality in northern red oak. USDA For. Ser., Southeastern Forest Exp. Sta., Research Note p. 6.
  40. Russell, T.E. 1973. Survival and growth of bar-slit planted northern red oak studied in Tennessee. Tree Planters' Notes 24:6-9.
  41. SAS Institute Inc., 1999. Statistical Analysis system's User's Guide Basics, Version, 8.2 (ed.). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC (USA).
  42. Schultz, R.C. and J.R. Thompson. 1990. Nursery practices that improve hardwood seedling root morphology. Tree Planters' Notes 41:21-32.
  43. Simpson, D.G. 1992. Root pruning of bareroot white spruce planting stock does not affect growth or survival after six years. Tree Planters' Notes 43:4-6.
  44. Thompson, J.R. and R.C. Schultz. 1995. Root system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in Iowa. New Forest 9:225-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035489
  45. Ward, J.S., M.P.N. Gent and G.R. Stephens. 2000. Effects of planting stock quality and browse protection-type on height growth of northern red oak and eastern white pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 127:205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00132-2
  46. Zaczek, J.J., K.C. Steiner and T.W. Bowersox. 1997. Northern red oak planting stock: 6-year results. New Forest 13:177-191. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006578007777
  47. 산림청. 2012. 종묘사업실시요령. 예규611호 p. 29.