DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Rural-Life Settlement Process of the People with the Multi-Habitation Lifestyles

멀티해비 라이프스타일 실천자의 전원생활 정착과정에 관한 연구

  • 최정민 (건국대학교 건축학부 주거환경전공)
  • Received : 2013.05.23
  • Accepted : 2013.07.30
  • Published : 2013.08.25

Abstract

This study examined the key factors that significantly improved the demand of multi-habitation. It determined the factors at the macroscopic level (or push factors) and the microscopic level (or pull factors). Focusing on a microscopic viewpoint, this study looked at the process of settlement through investigating 78 MH residents in the Seoul metropolitan area. The survey included the questions, such as who they are, how they prepared for moving, and how much they enjoyed their rural lives. In addition, any differences in this process were analyzed depending on respondents' characteristics. Major findings are as follows: First, general macro-level circumstances seemed supportive for the MH lifestyles. Second, six keywords were determined to represent the recent MH trends. They are "semi-sedentism, clustering, young people, female, money, and policy". Third, the distances between the original towns for native residents and new second-home towns for MH residents affected the interactions among them. However, these two groups had better relationships when the second-home towns were apart from the original towns. I then considered the need of a buffer zone between the two residential areas for MH residents. The conceptual difference between MH residents (i.e., semi-sedentism) and original rural residents (i.e., sedentism) might require certain types of buffer zones to continue good relationships among them.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경래 (2010). 멀티해비테이션 행복한 이중생활. 서울: 중앙일보 조인스랜드.
  2. 김용렬.류경선.박시현 (2012). 2012년 도시민 농촌관광 수요조사 결과. 서울: 한국농촌경제연구원.
  3. 김윤성 (2012). 최근 귀농.귀촌 현황과 지원 방향. 2012 NHERI 리포트 제177호.
  4. 송두범 (2010). 도시-농산어촌교류 활성화를 위한 정책과제: 충청남도 및 공주시 5도2촌 시책을 중심으로. 한국행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집, 1137-1161.
  5. 아사미야스시 (2003). 주거환경 평가방법과 이론(강부성.강인호.박인석.이규인.최정민 역). 서울: 시공문화사.
  6. 유정규 (2006). 도농 상생을 위한 도농교류의 의미와 활성화 전략. 지역재단 창립 2주년 기념 심포지엄.
  7. Choi, J. (2010). A Study on the Growing Trend of Multihabitation and its Demand Analysis. Journal of Korean Housing Association, 21(1), 89-101.
  8. Choi, J., Kang, J,. & Son, H. (2010). A Classification of Multi-habitation and Site Survey of the Related Lifestyles. Journal of Korean Housing Association, 21(3), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2010.21.3.041
  9. Choi, J., Wilson, M., Shim, E., & Jeong, E. (2011). Implications for Development of Kliengartens in Korea: Results of a Survey of Experts. Journal of Rural Development, 34(1), 39-69.
  10. Park, S. (2010). A Study on the Public Facilities and the Floor Plan of a Laube in Japanese Kleingarten. Korea Institute of Rural Architecture, 12(2), 49-59.
  11. Park, D., Lee, S., Lee, H., Lee, M., & Jang, M. (2006). Exploring the Allotment Gardens and Its Implication - Case Study on Kleingarten in German, Dacha in Russia and Civic Garden in Japan. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 12(2), 75-85.
  12. Park, S, Paek, H., Lim, J., Jung, S., & Seok, H. (2011). The Characteristics of Housing Demand and Housing Provision Method in a period of from $30,000 to $40,000 per capita annual income. Seongnam: Land & Housing Institute.
  13. Son, H., & Choi, J. (2011). A Study on Development of Korean Garden Community: Focused on Plan of Complex and Facility. The Korean Regional Development Association, 23(5), 119-144
  14. OK시골마을-캥거루하우스 http://blog.naver.com/oksigolro