DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Neo-confucianism(新儒學), Zhang Heng-qu(張橫渠)'s Qi-monism(氣一元論) and Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s Theory of Internal Injury(內傷學說)

신유학(新儒學), 장횡거(張橫渠)의 기일원론(氣一元論)과 이동원(李東垣)의 내상학설(內傷學說)

  • Lee, Yong-Bum (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics & Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, Sangji University)
  • 이용범 (상지대학교 한의과대학 원전의사학교실)
  • Received : 2013.07.20
  • Accepted : 2013.08.16
  • Published : 2013.08.25

Abstract

Objective : This paper was designed to confirm the relation between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)'s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)'s 'Qi-monism(氣一元論)'. Method : Through a comparative literature review, I searched for the commonality between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)'s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)'s 'Qi-monism(氣一元論)', and also examined the difference in the meaning of 'Primordial Qi(元氣)' in Qi-monism and that Lee Dong-yuan proposed. Result & Conclusion : The central theme of Neo-confucianism, 'Staying on the Golden Path(允執厥中)', has a commonality with Li Dong-yuan's theory of internal injury that emphasized Primordial Qi, and the concepts of "Great Vacuity as Qi(太虛卽氣)", "Two Properties Inherent in a Single Object(一物兩體)", and "the Nature of Acquired Disposition(氣質之性)" have commonality with the concepts of "The Given from the Vacuity of Natural World(所受於天)", Up & Down Movement(升降運動), and Yin Fire(陰火) of Primordial Qi in Li Dong-yuan's theory of internal injury respectively. However, the concept of Primordial Qi in the Theory of Qi-monism refers to the building blocks of all things in the universe, whereas the concept of Primordial Qi that Li Dong-yuan proposed has no meaning of component of body but driving force that maintains the phenomenon of life.

Keywords

References

  1. 김정각. 張載의 宇宙論 고찰. 열린정신 인문학 연구. 2009. 제 10집 제 2호. pp.192-199.
  2. 김학권. 張載의 우주론과 인간론. 철학연구. 2001.2. 제 77집. p.67. pp.65-66, 66-67, 68-75.
  3. 방정균. 李東垣이 陰火論에 대한 연구. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2008. 21권 1호. p.180.
  4. 孫廣仁. 兩種不同學科範疇的元氣學說. 北京中醫藥大學學報. 第 22卷 第 6期. 1999. 11. p.9. pp.9-10.
  5. 吳筱楓. "補土派"代表醫家李杲學術思想與 內經 理論淵源. 中華中醫藥學會 第十屆全國內經學 術研討會 學術論文集. 中華中醫藥學會內經學分會, 2010. p.250.
  6. 吳華强. 元氣源流探折. 廣西中醫藥. 第 13卷 第 4期. 1990. p.29, 31.
  7. 陳艶陽. 宋元時期醫學隊伍的組成特色. 醫史新獲. 2003.1. p.17.
  8. 裘沛然 主編. 中醫歷代各家學說. 上海. 上海科 學技術出版社. 1984. p.8.
  9. 王履 著. 醫經溯回集. 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1993. p.78.
  10. 金 李東垣 撰. 丁光迪, 文 魁 編校. 李東垣醫 集․內外傷辨惑論. 北京. 人民衛生出版社, 1995. p.7, 102, 284.
  11. 張載 原著. 丁海王 譯註. 完譯 正蒙. 서울. 명문당. 1991. p.15, 16, 26, 68.
  12. 전국한의과대학 원전학교실 편. 難經. 서울. 법인문화사. 2010. p.33, 96, 101.
  13. 전국한의과대학 원전학교실 편찬위원회. 類編 黃帝內經. 대전. 주민출판사. 2009. p.426.
  14. 朱子 集註. 成百曉 譯註. 懸吐完譯 大學中庸集 註. 서울. 傳統文化硏究會. 1995. p.25, 59, 53, 61, 62.
  15. 陳大舜 主編. 中醫各家學說. 湖南. 湖南科學技術出版社. 1989. p.54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 63,
  16. 河北醫學院 校釋. 靈樞經校釋. 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1998. p.353.