Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Balance between Productivities on Repetitive Construction Projects

  • Shim, Euysup (Department of Technology, Illinois State University) ;
  • Yoo, Wi Sung (Construction Management Division, Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea)
  • Received : 2013.01.17
  • Accepted : 2013.05.30
  • Published : 2013.08.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fast delivery of construction projects provides more value to project owners. Batch production, which is production not in single pieces, but in batches, is a common approach in repetitive construction projects such as multi-unit residential building construction projects. In batch production, the use of a small batch size allows the early start of subsequent activities, and thus can lead to early completion of projects. In addition to batch size, balance between productivities in construction activities can affect project duration. However, the impact of the balance between productivities with regard to their order on project duration has not been studied. The main goal of this study is to test a hypothesis, which is that the order of construction activities' unbalanced productivities affects the amount of time reduction that can be achieved by using a small batch size. A computer-based simulation model was developed, and five different cases were simulated to test the hypothesis. The conclusion of the simulation result is that the order of productivities does not affect the time reduction achieved by using a small batch size. It is expected that the findings of this study can help general contractors make decisions in terms of batch size.

Keywords

References

  1. Birrell GS. Construction planning-beyond critical path. Journal of the Construction Division. 1980 Sep;106(3):389-407.
  2. Alves TC, Tommelein ID. Buffering and batching practices in the HVAC industry. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-11); 2003 Jul 26-28; Blacksburg. Virginia (USA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2003. p. 1-13.
  3. Reinschmidt K, Trejo D. Economic value of building faster. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2006 Jul;132(7):759-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:7(759)
  4. Oglesby CHP, Henry W, Howell GA. Productivity improvement in construction. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1989. 343 p.
  5. Sacks R, Goldin M. Lean management model for construction of high-rise apartment buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2007 May;133(5):374-84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:5(374)
  6. Howell G, Laufer A, Ballard G. Interaction between sub-cycles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1993 Dec;119(4):714-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:4(714)
  7. Nielsen AS, Thomassen MA. How to reduce batch-size. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-12); 2004 Aug 3-5; Copenhagen. Elsinore (Denmark): Lean Construction Institute; 2004. p. 263-73.
  8. Shim E. Impacts of matched batch sizes on time reduction in construction projects. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction; 2011 Jun 29-Jul 2; Seoul. Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management; 2011. p. 929-34.
  9. Thomas H, Maloney W, Horner R, Smith G, Handa V, Sanders S. Modeling construction labor productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1990 Dec;116(4):705-26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(705)
  10. Shim E. The decision-making modeling for concurrent planning of construction projects [dissertation]. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University; 2008. 239 p.
  11. Horman M, Thomas R. Role of inventory buffers in construction labor performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2005 Jul;131(7):834-43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(834)
  12. Yoon JY, Kim YS, Kim JJ. Suggestion improvement based on form work productivity analysis in apartment housing construction. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Oct;12(5):49-56. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.1.049
  13. Tommelein ID, Riley DR, Howell GA. Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1999 Sep;125(5):304-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(304)
  14. Ward S, McElwee A. Application of the principle of batch size reduction in construction. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-15); 2007 Jul 15-17; East Lansing. Michigan (MI): Aardvark Global Publishing; 2007. p. 178-90.
  15. Sawhney A., Walsh K, Bashford H and Palaniappan S. Impact of inspected buffers on production parameters of construction processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2009 Apr;135(4):309-29.
  16. Harris RB, Ioannou PG. Scheduling projects with repeating activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1998 July/August;124(4):269-78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(269)
  17. Harmelink D, Rowings JE. Linear scheduling model: Development of controlling activity path. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1998 July/August; 124(4):263-68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(263)
  18. Mattila KG, Park A. Comparison of linear scheduling model and repetitive scheduling method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2003 Feb;129(1):56-64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(56)
  19. Kenley R, Seppanen O. Location-based management for construction. 1st ed. New York,: Spon Press; 2010. 554 p.
  20. Lee HS, Park GJ, Park MS, Ryu HG. Construction planning model for using the working space of high-rise building construction. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (Structure/ Construction). 2010 Jun;26(6):129-38.
  21. Ryu HG. A method of applying work relationships for a linear scheduling model. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Oct;10(4):31-9. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.4.031
  22. Shim E. Selection of compatible construction methods for project expedition. Proceedings of the 46th Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) Annual International Conference; 2010 Apr. 7-10; Boston, Massachusetts (USA): Lambert Academic Publishing; 2010. p. 119-27.