Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Translation and Psychometric Properties of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction Assistive Technology 2.0

QUEST 2.0의 한국어 번안 및 심리측정학적 특징

  • Lee, Sang-Heon (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical Sciences, SoonChunHyang University) ;
  • Jung, Bong-Keun (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical Sciences, SoonChunHyang University) ;
  • Park, So-Yeon (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Sangji University)
  • 이상헌 (순천향대학교 의료과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정봉근 (순천향대학교 의료과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박소연 (상지대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2013.01.23
  • Accepted : 2013.07.11
  • Published : 2013.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate QUEST 2.0 in Korean with valid translation process and to measure psychometric characteristics. Translation process was consist of six steps. Internal consistency was analyzed by Cronbach's ${\alpha}$. Test-Retest reliability was analyzed by Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Internal consistency of 'Assistive device' was .88, 'Services' .92. There was no statistically significant difference according to repetitive measure. The spearman correlation coefficient was .64 for "Assistive Device" and .66 for "Services". This result reflects K-QUEST 2.0's (Korean-Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction Assistive Technology 2.0) safety, consistency, and predictability in aspect of measure. In this study, the K-QUEST 2.0 was translated into Korean and the reliability of K-QUEST 2.0 was tested. Decisively, the K-QUEST 2.0 can be applied to evaluate user satisfaction of assistive technology.

본 연구는 보조공학기기(보조기구) 및 보조공학서비스 만족도 측정도구인 QUEST 2.0(Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction Assistive Technology 2.0)을 한국어로 번안 후 심리측정학적 특징을 분석하였다. 한국어 번안과정은 6단계로 진행되었다. 내적일치도는 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$를 사용하여 분석하였고 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 스피어만 순위 상관계수를 사용하였다. QUEST는 보조기구의 만족도를 알아보기 위한 8개 항목과 보조기구 서비스 영역을 알아보기 위한 4개 항목으로 구성되어 있다. 두 영역의 내적일치도는 '보조기구' 영역에서는 .88, '보조기구 서비스' 영역에서는 .93으로 나타났으며, 검사-재검사 신뢰도 검증에서 보조기구 및 보조기구 서비스의 상관계수는 각각 .64와 .66으로 유의하였다. 이와 같은 결과는 측정 결과의 안정성, 일관성, 예측가능성을 반영한다. 이 연구를 통하여 한국어로 번역된 K-QUEST 2.0은 보조공학서비스 수혜자의 만족도를 측정하는데 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang MY, Jung HY. "Delphi method on course subjects for occupational therapists as assistive technology practitioners: assistive technology services in general and for the aged", The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.39-62, 2007.
  2. Lee HK, Bae JH, Chae SY. "Research on the recognition and use of assistive technology by rehabilitation workers of nursing facilities for seniors", The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.37-48, 2007.
  3. Jung DH. "A study on the assistive devices and services satisfaction of the college students with visual impairment", Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 15, No.2, pp.129-146, 2011.
  4. Cook A, Chan A. "The validity and applicability for the chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology for people with spinal cord injury", Technology and Disability, Vol. 17, pp.205-216, 2002.
  5. MAO H, Chen W, Huang S, et al., "Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version", Vol.24, pp.412-421, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215509347438
  6. Demer L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. "Manual for the administration of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2): an outcome measure for assistive technology devices". Institute for Matching Persons and Technology, 2000.
  7. Demer L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. "Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology(QUEST version 2.0)". New York, 2000.
  8. Demer L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. "Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology(QUEST version 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability", Vol.14, pp.101-105, 2002.
  9. Park KY, Chung YJ, Kim JH. "The reliability and validity of the spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III, The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy", Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.97-109, 2009.
  10. Chan SOC, Chan APS. "The validity and applicability of the chinese version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (C-QUEST) for people with spinal cord injury". Assistive Technology, Vol.11. pp.25-33, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2006.10131904

Cited by

  1. Development of Mobile Application based on ICF(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) for Provision of Assistive Devices for People with Disabilities vol.15, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.1.377