DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중온화 첨가제 첨가비율에 따른 현장 적용성 평가 및 실내 역학적 거동 특성 연구

Evaluation of Field Application and Laboratory Performance of Warm-Mix Asphalt According to the Dosage Rate of Additive

  • 양성린 (한국건설기술연구원 도로포장연구실) ;
  • 백철민 (한국건설기술연구원 도로포장연구실) ;
  • 황성도 (한국건설기술연구원 도로포장연구실) ;
  • 권수안 (한국건설기술연구원 도로포장연구실)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.12
  • 심사 : 2013.08.06
  • 발행 : 2013.08.16

초록

PURPOSES : The purpose of this study is to evaluate of field application and laboratory performance of warm-mix asphalt (WMA) according to the dosage rate of organic-based WMA additive. METHODS: Three asphalt mixtures, i.e., hot mix asphalt (HMA), WMA with the dosage rate of 1.5%, WMA with the dosage rate of 1.0%, were sampled from the asphalt plant when the field trial project were constructed. With these mixtures, the laboratory testings were performed to evaluate the linear viscoelastic characteristics and the resistance to moisture, rutting and fatigue damage. RESULTS : From the laboratory test results, it was found that the WMA with the reduced dosage rate of additive would be comparable to HMA and WMA with the original dosage rate in terms of the dynamic modulus, tensile strength ratio, rutting resistance. However, the fatigue reisistance of WMA with the reduced dosage rate was slightly worse but it should be noted that the fatigue performance is necessarily predicted by combining the material properties and pavement structure. CONCLUSIONS: Through the field construction and laboratory testings, the dosage rate of organic-based WMA additive could be reduced from 1.5% to 1.0% without the significant decrease of compactability and laboratory performance. The long-term performance of the constructed pavement will be periodically monitored to support the findings from this study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AASHTO. (2007). Resistance of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) to Moisture-Induced Damage. AASHTO T 283, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
  2. AAHSTO. (2007). Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). AASHTO TP 62, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
  3. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC. (2008). NCHRP Report 9- 43: Mix Design Practices for Warm Mix Asphalt. Interim Report, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
  4. ARA Inc. (2004). ERES Consultants. Guide for Mechanistic- Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
  5. ChemLOCUS. (2013). Wax Price Trend in Europe. www.chemlocus.co.kr. Accessed Feb. 01. 2013.
  6. Kaloush, K. E. and M. W. Witczak. (2002). Tertiary Flow Characteristics of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, AAPT, Vol. 71. pp. 248-280.
  7. Kutay, M. E., N. Gibson, and J. Youtcheff. (2008). Conventional and Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD) - Based Fatigue Analysis of Polymer Modified Asphalt Pavements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, AAPT, Vol. 77, pp. 395-434.
  8. Meyers, L. A., R. Roque, and B. E. Ruth. (1998). Mechanisms of Surface-Initiated Longitudinal Wheel Path Cracks in High-Type Bituminous Pavements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, AAPT, Vol. 67, pp. 401-432.
  9. Rao Tangella, S. C. S., J. Craus, J. A. Deacon, and C. L. Monismith. (1990). Summary Report on Fatigue
  10. Response of Asphalt Mixtures. Prepared for Strategic Highway Research Program, Project A003-A, Institute of Trasportation Studies, University of Carolina. Berkeley, CA.
  11. Reese, R. (1997). Properties of Aged Asphalt Binder Related to Asphalt Concrete Fatigue Life. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, AAPT, Vol. 66, pp. 604-632.
  12. Von Quintus, H. L., J. Mallela, R. Bonaquist, C. W. Schwartz, and R. L. Carvalho. (2012). Calibration of Rutting Models for Structural and Mix Design. NCHRP Report 719, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C.