DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study of fracture strength depending on the occlusal thickness of full zirconia crown

완전 지르코니아 크라운의 교합면 두께에 따른 파절강도의 비교 연구

  • Jang, Soo-Ah (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Young (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School)
  • 장수아 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김윤영 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 박원희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.04.19
  • Accepted : 2013.07.03
  • Published : 2013.07.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of traditional metal-ceramic crowns and full zirconia crowns according to the occlusal thickness. Materials and methods: A mandibular first molar resin tooth was prepared with 1.5 mm occlusal reduction, 1.0 mm rounded shoulder margin and $6^{\circ}$ taperness in the axial wall. Duplicating the resin tooth, 64 metal dies were fabricated. 48 full zirconia crowns were fabricated using Prettau zirconia blanks by ZIRKONZAHN CAD/CAM and classified into six groups according to the occlusal thickness (0.5 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm). 16 metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated and classified into two groups according to the occlusal porcelain thickness (1.0 mm, 1.5 mm). All crowns were cemented on each metal die and mounted in a universal testing machine. The load was directed at the functional cusp of each specimen until catastrophic failure occurred. One-way ANOVA, Tukey multiple comparison test (${\alpha}=.05$) and t-test (${\alpha}=.05$) were used. Results: The results were as follows. 1. The test 1 group (646.48 N) showed the lowest fracture strength (P<.05), and the value of the test 2.3.4.5 groups (866.40 N, 978.82 N, 1196.82 N, 1222.41 N) increased as thickness increased, but no significant difference were found with the groups (P>.05). The value of test 6 group (1781.24 N) was significantly higher than those of the other groups (P<.05). 2. There were no significant differences of the fracture strength of metal ceramic crowns according to occlusal porcelain thickness 1.0 mm (2515.71 N) and 1.5 mm (3473.31 N) (P<.05). Conclusion: Full zirconia crown needs to be 1.0 mm or over in occlusal thickness for the posterior area to have higher fracture strength than maximum bite force.

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 전통적인 금속도재관과 완전 지르코니아 크라운의 교합면 두께에 따른 파절강도를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 하악 제1대구치에 해당하는 레진치를 교합면 1.5 mm, 변연은 1.0 mm 폭의 rounded shoulder로 하고 축면 경사각이 $6^{\circ}$가 되도록 삭제하여 금속 다이 64개를 제작하였다. 완전 지르코니아 크라운은ZIRKONZAHN CAD/CAM을 이용하여 Prettau zirconia blanks를 절삭하여 48개의 크라운을 제작하고 교합면 교두정의 두께에 따라 6개 군으로 분류하였다(0.5 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm). 16개의 금속도재관을 제작하여 교합면 교두정 도재의 두께에 따라 2개 군으로 분류하였다(1.0 mm, 1.5 mm). 완성된 완전 지르코니아 크라운과 금속도재관은 만능시험기 상에서 치아 교합면에 수직으로 하중이 가하도록 하여 파절강도를 측정하였다. One-way ANOVA, Tukey multiple comparison test (${\alpha}=.05$)와 t-test (${\alpha}=.05$)로 검정하였다. 결과: 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 실험 1군은 가장 낮은 값(646.48 N)을 나타내었고(P<.05), 실험 2, 3, 4, 5군은 교합면의 두께가 증가할수록 파절강도는 증가하였지만 (866.40 N, 978.82 N, 1196.82 N, 1222.41 N) 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(P>.05). 실험 6군은 다른 군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 가장 높은 값(1781.24 N)을 나타내었다(P<.05). 2. 대조군의 파절강도는 도재의 두께가 1.0 mm와 1.5 mm일때각각2515.71 N, 3473.31 N이며 이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(P>.05). 결론: 완전 지르코니아 크라운은 대구치부에서 최대교합력보다 높은 파절강도를 갖기 위해서는 1.0 mm이상의 두께가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ernsmere JB. Porcelain dental work. Br J Dent Sci 1900;43:547-
  2. Weinstein M, Katz S, Weinstein AB. Fused porcelain-to-metal teeth. 1962; US patent 3052, 982.
  3. Johnston JF. Porcelain veneers bonded to gold castings-A progress report. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:120-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(58)90021-0
  4. Piddock V, Qualtrough AJ. Dental ceramics-an update. J Dent 1990;18:227-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(90)90019-B
  5. Adair PJ, Grossman DG. The castable ceramic crown. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1984;4:32-46.
  6. Optec HSP laboratory technique manual. Jeneric/Pentro Inc, Wallingford, Conn,. 1988.
  7. Sadoun M. All ceramic bridges with the slip casting technique. Presented at the 7tb International Symposium on Ceramics. Paris, September, 1988.
  8. Beham G. IPS-Empress: a new ceramic technology. ZWR 1991;100:404-8.
  9. Garvie RC, Hannik RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic Steel? Nature 1975;258:703-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/258703a0
  10. Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Net-shaping of ceramic components by direct ceramic machining. Assembly Autom 2003;23:382-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310501217
  11. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  12. Bachhav VC, Aras MA. Zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a clinical review. Quintessence Int 2011;42:173-82.
  13. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 2010;19:64-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00513.x
  14. Sailer I, Fehe′r A, Filser F, Lu¨thy H, Gauckler LJ, Scha¨rer P, Franz Ha¨mmerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93.
  15. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:223-7.
  16. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 8th ed. St Louis, Mo: The CV Mosby Co, 1989.
  17. Waltimo A, Ko¨no¨nen M. Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53: 254-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005982
  18. Waltimo A, Nystro¨m M, Ko¨no¨nen M. Bite force and dentofacial morphology in men with severe dental attrition. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:92-6.
  19. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia GM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent 2004;32:451-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.009
  20. Brukl CE, Ocampo RR. Compressive strengths of a new foil and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57: 404-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90003-5
  21. Lee SM, Jeong HC, Jeon YC. Fracture strength of zirconia monolithic crowns and metal-ceramic crowns after cyclic loading and thermocycling. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45: 12-20.
  22. Shin MR, Kim MJ, Oh SC. Fracture load and marginal fitness of zirconia ceramic coping by design and coloration. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:406-15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.4.406

Cited by

  1. Understanding and trends of esthetic treatment in prosthodontics : part 2. Zirconia vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.05.617
  2. 지르코니아 코핑과 전장도재 간의 전단결합강도와 파절양상 비교 vol.37, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2015.37.4.243
  3. 지르코니아의 소결 후 특성 vol.38, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.3.157
  4. Color changes of monolithic zirconia block before and after sintering vol.44, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.44.02.202006.61