References
- Antoch G, Bockisch A: Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension inwhole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:113-120 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0951-6
- Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, et al: Wholebody dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 290:3199-3206 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.24.3199
- Beer AJ, Eiber M, Souvatzoglou M, Schwaiger M, Krause BJ: Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. Lancet Oncology 12:181-191 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70103-0
- Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T: X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/ computed tomography scanners. Semin Nucl Med 33:166-179 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2003.127307
- Zaidi H: Is MRI-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual modality PET/MRI imaging? Radiology 244:639-642 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2443070092
- Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, et al: Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI : evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 50:520-526 (2009) https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054726
- Zincirkeser S, Sahin E, Halac M, Sager S: Standardized uptake values of normal organs on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging. J Int Med Res 35:231-236 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000703500207
- Boellaard R: Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med 50:11-20 (2009) https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057182
- Hong SL: A study for distortion of standardized uptake value according to the does and lesion size using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Graduates school Korea Univ, Seoul, Korea (2012)
- Menda Y, Bushnell DL, Madsen MT, McLaughlin K, Kahn D, Kernstine KH: Evaluation of various corrections to the standardized uptake value for diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy. Nucl Med Common 22:1077-1081 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200110000-00004
- Zasadny KR, Wahl RL: Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology 189:847-850 (1993)
- Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA: From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50 Suppl 1:122S-150S (2009) https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
- Matthias E, Axel MM, Michael S, et al: Value of a dixon- based MRI/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:1691-1701 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1842-9
- Katrine Å: PET/CT: nuclear medicine imaging in the future. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 139:8-11 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq083
- Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V, et al: MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med 49:1875- 1883 (2008) https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.049353
- Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S, et al: Automatic, three-segment, MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:138- 152 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1603-1
- Boellaard R, O'Doherty MJ, Weber WA, et al: FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guide-lines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:181-200 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4
- Lauenstein TC, Semelka RC: Emerging techniques: whole body screening and staging with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:489-498 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20666
- Castelijns JA, van den Brekel MWM: Imaging of lymphadenopathy in the neck. Eur Radiology 12:727-738 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300101102
- Kim WP: Statistical analysis lecture fundamentals. Statistics & Society 90:97-289 (2007)