한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.101-111
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DEA기법과 LCC개념을 활용한 교량형식 선정 방법에 관한 연구

A Study on the Selection of a Bridge Structure Type Using DEA and LCC

  • 한삼희 (군산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김종길 (호원대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • 투고 : 2013.01.28
  • 심사 : 2013.04.22
  • 발행 : 2013.07.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 울산~포항 간 복선전철 건설예정인 교량을 사례로 교량형식별 LCC 개념을 적용 경제성이 가장 우수한 공법을 적용하기 위하여 같은 연장 (L=1,615m)을 갖는 유사한 4개 교량에 대한 DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) 분석을 실시하였다. DEA 모형은 상대적 효율성 평가를 위해 개발된 CCR 모형을 사용하였으며, 투입변수로 초기건설비용, 유지관리비용, 간접비용 (사용자비용 + 사회간접 손실비용), 생애주기비용을 사용, 산출변수로는 평균 내구연한을 사용하였다. 투입 변수 산정을 위해 생애주기비용 분석을 사용하였는데 생애주기 비용 산정은 분석기간 100년, 실질할인율 4.83%를 적용 하였으며, 비용의 분류는 초기건설비용, 유지관리비용, 사용자비용, 사회간접손실비용으로 분류 하였다. 분석결과, 비교 2안과 비교 3안이 가장 효율적인 것으로 분석되었으며, 나머지 대안의 효율성은 비교 1안, 기본안, 비교 4안 순서로 나타났다.

In this study, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) was carried out on the four bridges, which have the same extension (L=1,615m), in order to select the most superior, economical method of construction using the LCC concept of each bridge structure in the case of the Ulsan-Pohang double track railway which is scheduled to be constructed. DEA models were analyzed with the CCR model, which was designed for the evaluation of relative efficiency of each model. The initial construction costs, maintenance costs, indirect costs (user costs + indirect loss of social costs), and life cycle costs were used as input variables, and average duration was applied as the output variable. LCC was applied to calculate the input variables, and to get the costs of LCC, 100 years of period and 4.83% of real discount rate were applied, and the costs are classified into initial construction, maintenance, user, and indirect loss of social cost. The analysis results showed that the Method 2 and 3 were evaluated as the most efficient, and the other alternatives were evaluated as the following order; Method 1, the default, and Method 4.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AASHTO, Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, 1994.
  2. Ahn, J. W., Cha, K. S., Kim, Y. S., A Case Study on the Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Steel Box Girder and Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridge, Journal of the Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2001, pp.59-67 (in Korean).
  3. Ahn, J. W., The Economic Analysis of Bridges Based on Life Cycle Costing Technique, Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School Choong Ang University, 2002 (in Korean).
  4. Ahn, Y. J., A Study on the Economic Evaluation for Bridge Superstructures Using VE / LCC, Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School A-Ju University, 2007 (in Korean).
  5. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, 1984, pp.1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  6. Banker, R. D., Morey, R. C., Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1986, pp.513-521. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.4.513
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E., European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, 1978, pp.429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  8. Cheon, Y. H., Lee, Y. D., Park, H., Kim, S. M., Study on the Bridge Maintenance and Operation Level Using Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp.101-107 (in Korean).
  9. Choi, K. D., Developing Bridge Maintenance Policy Using Life Cycle Costing Analysis, Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School Choong Ang University, 2001 (in Korean).
  10. Choi, Y. M., Kim, D. S., Cho, S. K., Kwon, C., Life Cycle Cost Analysis of SCP Composite Girder Bridge for Railroad, Journal of the Korean Society For Railway, 1738-6225, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2006, pp.244-249 (in Korean).
  11. De, Brito. J., Branco, F., Concrete Bridge Management: From Design to Maintenance, Periodical on Structure Design and Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1998, pp.68-75. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:2(68)
  12. Fare, R., Lovell, C. A. K., Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 19, 1978, pp.150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1
  13. Farrell, M. J., "The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 12, 1957, pp.260-261.
  14. Kang, C. H., Choi, T. H., Kim, Y. S., A Case Study on the Economic Analysis of Type PSCI Bridge Using LCC Technique, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp.91-99 (in Korean).
  15. Kim, E. Y., Cho, J. Y., Lee, J. W., A Study on the Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Railroad Bridges, Journal of the Korean Society For Railway, Vol. 16, 2007, pp.30-41 (in Korean).
  16. Kim, G. S., Optimum Life Cycle Cost Design of Steel Box Girder Bridges, Thesis, Graduate School Han Yang University, 1999 (in Korean).
  17. Kim, K. T., Lee, D. H., LRT bridge LCC analysis practices, Vol. 280, 2007, pp.23-32 (in Korean).
  18. Kim, M. S., A Study on the Efficiency Assessment of Service Company' branches by DEA Method, Thesis, Graduate School Seoul National University of Technology, 2010 (in Korean).
  19. Kim, S. S., Kim, Y. S., Ahn, J. W., A Case Study on the Selection of a Bridge Superstructure Type Using AHP Technique and LCC Concept, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2001, pp.673-681 (in Korean).
  20. Kirby, J. G., Grgas, J. M., Estimating the life expectancy of facilities. Technical. Report P-36 USA Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, 1975.
  21. Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Development of Life Cycle Cost Analysis Method and System for the Life-Cycle Cost Optimum Design and the Life-Time Management of Steel Bridges (Annual Report of Hydrologic Data, 2002), 2003.
  22. Kwon, S. H., Kim, S. B., Park, Y. J., A Case Study on the Reduction Costs Prediction of a Reinforced Concrete Bridge using LCC Method, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2007, pp.160-170 (in Korean).
  23. Lee, P. S., Seo, K. S., A Study for the Estimation of the Maintenance-Repair Cost of the Buildings, Journal of the architectural institute of Korea, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1981, pp.63-68 (in Korean).
  24. Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Check the safety of the facility and precision safety diagnosis guidelines, 2006, p.148.
  25. Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Safety inspection and precise safety diagnosis based cost (cost estimating), 2003.
  26. Nishikawa, K., A Concept of Minimized Maintenance Bridges, Foundation and Bridge, 1997, pp.64-72.
  27. Piringer, S., Whole-Life Costing of Steel Bridges, Bridge Management 2, Thomas Telford, London, U. K., 1993, pp.584-593.
  28. Seskin, S. N., Comprehensive framework for highway economic impact assessment methods and result, Transportation Research Record 1274, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 1990, pp.24-34.
  29. Shin, Y. S., Park, J. H., Ahn, S. C., Economics analysis for life cycle cost design of bridges, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 2010 Annual Conference (in Korean).