말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)

  • 제5권2호
  • /
  • Pages.43-51
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2005-8063(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-5854(eISSN)
한국음성학회 (Korean Society of Speech Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

강음절이 한국어 화자의 영어 연속 음성의 어휘 분절에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Strong Syllables on Lexical Segmentation in English Continuous Speech by Korean Speakers

  • 투고 : 2013.04.02
  • 심사 : 2013.06.20
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

English native listeners have a tendency to treat strong syllables in a speech stream as the potential initial syllables of new words, since the majority of lexical words in English have a word-initial stress. The current study investigates whether Korean (L1) - English (L2) late bilinguals perceive strong syllables in English continuous speech as word onsets, as English native listeners do. In Experiment 1, word-spotting was slower when the word-initial syllable was strong, indicating that Korean listeners do not perceive strong syllables as word onsets. Experiment 2 was conducted in order to avoid any possibilities that the results of Experiment 1 may be due to the strong-initial targets themselves used in Experiment 1 being slower to recognize than the weak-initial targets. We employed the gating paradigm in Experiment 2, and measured the Isolation Point (IP, the point at which participants correctly identify a word without subsequently changing their minds) and the Recognition Point (RP, the point at which participants correctly identify the target with 85% or greater confidence) for the targets excised from the non-words in the two conditions of Experiment 1. Both the mean IPs and the mean RPs were significantly earlier for the strong-initial targets, which means that the results of Experiment 1 reflect the difficulty of segmentation when the initial syllable of words was strong. These results are consistent with Kim & Nam (2011), indicating that strong syllables are not perceived as word onsets for Korean listeners and interfere with lexical segmentation in English running speech.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, S. M., & Nam, K. C. (2011). Strong (stressed) syllables in English and lexical segmentation by Koreans. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 3(1), 3-14. (김선미, 남기춘 (2011). 영어의 강음절 (강세 음절)과 한국어 화자의 단어 분절. 말소리와 음성과학, 3(1), 3-14.)
  2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  3. Cotton, S., & Grosjean, F. (1984). The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205923
  4. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992), Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M
  5. Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0
  6. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
  7. Darcy, I., & Kruger, F. (2012). Vowel perception and production in Turkish children acquiring L2 German. Journal of Phonetics, 40(4), 568-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.001
  8. Darcy, I., Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2007). Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. In Jennifer Cole, and José Hualde (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 9, (pp. 1-34).
  9. Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H. (2012). The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.004
  10. Gaskell, M. G., Spinelli, E. & Meunier, F. (2002). Perception of resyllabification in French. Memory and Cognition, 30(5), 798-810. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196435
  11. Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696386999
  12. Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675-687. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131210
  13. Jusczyk P. W. (1997). Finding and remembering words: Some beginnings by English-learning infants. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(6), 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772947
  14. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.621
  15. McQueen, J. M., Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (2001). Rhythmic cues and possible-word constraints in Japanese speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2763
  16. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191-243. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0671
  17. Simon, E. (2010). Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules: evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences, 32(1), 63-86.
  18. Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3129127
  19. Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203056
  20. Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception & Psychophysics, 38(3), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207148
  21. Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1998). The role of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2548
  22. Wally, A., Michela, V., & Wood, D. (1995). The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation fromat on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 343-351. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213059
  23. Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 597-607. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2141003